Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-14 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Gentleman,

I few years ago I bought an HP5370A about the seller was saying that he
was selling it that cheap (200 US$) because he was not able to test
whether this device would hold its specifications.

As it turned it displayed SOMETIMES large amounts (a few hundred
picoseconds) of RMS jitter and NOT on other times on the handbook's
jitter self test. I have been trying a lot to improve the situation by 

a) correctly adjusting the input trigger circuits

b) correctly adjusting the 200 MHz multiplier

c) correctly adjusting the two interpolator boards

Each of the adjustment procedures went exactly as descibed in the
handbook. However, there was no improvement on the total situation. The
counter insisted on sometimes behaving this way and sometimes the other
way. Sometimes it seemed as if there were even a slow continouos
movement between the two extremes perhaps due to temperature. I had
already realized that the counter was scrap with no sale value when I
remembered my friend Frank who happens to repair old HP stuff for one of
the local surplus dealers. He had an defective 5370A around so that I
was able to make some exchanges on board level. 

After changing some boards forward and back it became appearant that
exchanging ONE of the interpolator boards would immediatly change the
situation in that way that the counter would display an RMS jitter of
30-40 ps for any amount of time I would give him. So clearly the this
interpolator board had an problem. Most of the electronic stuff on the
interpolator board is plain electronics that might been gathered even
today with the BIG exception of the oscillators that are part of the
phase startable plls on the interpolator boards. These oscillators are
of the delay line type and are contained in the unusual looking metal
cans on the interpolator boards. So I had to test, whether the problem
was located in this oscillator (in which case I was in difficulty
because it it a HP propiarity product) or elsewhere (in which case I
would be probably able to repair the board).

By exchanging the oscillator between the boards the problem wandered, so
clearly the problem WAS in the oscillator. Fortunately enough I managed
to coax Frank a bad interpolator board with a good oscillator and
since that my 5370 works ok.

Best regads
Ulrich Bangert  

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Didier Juges
 Gesendet: Samstag, 14. Juli 2007 05:38
 An: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter
 
 
 ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
 Errors-To: 
 time-nuts-bounces+df6jb=ulrich-bangert.de+df6jb=ulrich-bangert
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Magnus,
 
 My first 5370A had severe distortion on the 10 MHz output, 
 but in my case. It looked like 30 MHz with some 10 MHz 
 component (no 5 MHz), and was otherwise stable. It turned out 
 some of the capacitors in the output filter of the amplifier 
 board had cold solder joints (not unusual on these units), 
 causing the tank circuit to resonate at 30 MHz instead of 10. 
 Once reflowed, all went back to normal (except that did not 
 fix the bad socket problem, but that's another issue :-)
 
 Didier KO4BB
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
 Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 4:04 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter
 
 Hi fellow time-nuts!
 
 As my vacation started this evening, I spent some time in the 
 lab (at work, since that's where I find my Wavecrest and it 
 has better selection of active probes), trimming up the 200 
 MHz multiplier chain. I shifted it down from 17 ps RMS to 
 3.9-4.0 ps RMS. Most of the trimmings where on the 200 MHz 
 part where as the 50 MHz part where fairly clean already from start.
 
 I may be able to tweak the jitter of the 200 MHz down 
 further, but it would require more work than my rather 
 quick-and-dirty approach.
 
 However, I was quite supprised to notice that there is alot 
 of modulation on the 10 MHz output. The histogram shows two 
 distinct gaussian bells and when checking the high-frequency 
 modulation it showed a 5 MHz modulation. The spectrum 
 analyzer clearly shows the 5 MHz output.
 
 I will make more investigation to the source of that 5 MHz, 
 but it is annoying. If it is a property that my 5370B shares 
 with others, then it will certainly be a limiting factor for 
 self-referenced jitter measures as well as use of the output 
 for low-jitter measures.
 
 I think the main source of sub-10 MHz clocks is the divide 
 down on the CPU board A9. It generates control signals which 
 is sent along the motherboard so there is alot of chance to 
 jump over and infect the output buffer.
 
 Could you please have a look with a spectrum analyzer on your 
 10 MHz output. I have not checked how it behaves with 
 external 10 MHz applied.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-14 Thread Magnus Danielson
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:16:38 EDT
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Said,

Returning to this message...

 I sent spectrum plots of the 10MHz 5370B output to this list earlier, the  
 output is very sad. It's extremely dirty and jittery (well, compared to the 
 4ps  
 noise you got, and compared to what the 10811 can deliver).

Further investigations have now shown that the 10811 output is clean, just a
little 3rd harmonic but nothing to worry about. The INT test point is also
clean. I suspect the output drive part, as other outputs to various parts are
also free of the 5 MHz. The 10 MHz present detector circuit is currently my
main suspect. It consists of a one-shot multi-vibrator triggered by the 10 MHz
signal. Having a RC time-constant of 100 ns makes it a suspect indeed. Probing
it (pin 11 on A8U1) clearly shows a waveform wich looks like a 25% 5 MHz with
a short spike on it. This little culprit of a detector is infact a wideband
comb-generator which contributes its 5 MHz as sidebands to the output 10 MHz.
It's only purpose in life is to light a LED only visible to the servicing
engineer (me in this case). Thus, making a small modification to disable it
during normal operation would improve the quality of the 10 MHz output
considerably if I am right. Since I don't do ECL design on a daily basis, I
will have to ponder a bit in order to come up with a good method of acheiving
this.

 After calibration to 4ps, what does your 5370B unit read for it's  internal 
 RMS noise now?

Self-reference from 10 MHz output gives 29.9-34.0 ps.
A 130 MHz +15 dBm sine results in readings in the 35-41 ps range.
A 5 MHz +15 dBm sine from the Cesium does not acheive as deep levels, but
reaches 39-43 ps but does not vary as much.
A 10 MHz from anther 10811 source reaches 37-43 ps.

All measures where taken in TI mode, +/- TI, StdDev for 1k samples.
Optimum 1M/50 Ohm termination strategy selected for each signal. Flipping the
input termination switches for both channels quickly creates different levels
of input jitter.

I have not trimmed anything but the multiplier stage.

I have tested running frequency measurements and up to about 130 MHz seems
safe. At 133 MHz it will start to false-trigger and at 134 MHz it is just
starting to make obvious errors and at higher numbers it gives nonsense
readings.

I might add that I have only trimmed the 200 MHz multiplier chain so far.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-14 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hej Magnus
Magnus Danielson wrote:
 Further investigations have now shown that the 10811 output is clean, just a
 little 3rd harmonic but nothing to worry about. The INT test point is also
 clean. I suspect the output drive part, as other outputs to various parts are
 also free of the 5 MHz. The 10 MHz present detector circuit is currently my
 main suspect. It consists of a one-shot multi-vibrator triggered by the 10 
 MHz
 signal. Having a RC time-constant of 100 ns makes it a suspect indeed. 
 Probing
 it (pin 11 on A8U1) clearly shows a waveform wich looks like a 25% 5 MHz with
 a short spike on it. This little culprit of a detector is infact a wideband
 comb-generator which contributes its 5 MHz as sidebands to the output 10 MHz.
 It's only purpose in life is to light a LED only visible to the servicing
 engineer (me in this case). Thus, making a small modification to disable it
 during normal operation would improve the quality of the 10 MHz output
 considerably if I am right. Since I don't do ECL design on a daily basis, I
 will have to ponder a bit in order to come up with a good method of acheiving
 this.

   
Try shorting AU8U1 Pins 6 and 7 to ground.
This turns of the npn output emitter followers driving the longtailed 
pair which drives the LED.
This is permitted and nothing will be destroyed or degraded even if the 
shorts are permanent.
 Cheers,
 Magnus
   
Bruce


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-14 Thread Magnus Danielson
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Magnus Danielson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:54:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hej fellow time-nuts,

 So, no more 5 MHz with overtones on my HP5370B thanks to this quick fix.
 
 Self-referenced jitter did not change significantly thought. It is actually
 slightly higher numbers, but that may be due to heatup or something. I noticed
 that during my previous run too.

After carefull tuning of the input trigger level while still running +/- TI and
1k samples, I am now down to the 13.0-15.0 ps RMS range. The MEAN for those
numbers is at -1.85 ns.

This by itself should be an interesting little piece of knowledge and
correlates well with what is to be expected.

To acheive these numbers for a broader range of TI values one would have to
work a bit on the instrument thought. It is nice to know that it can reach down
there at least.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-14 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
In a message dated 7/14/2007 16:45:19 Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

It's  only purpose in life is to light a LED only visible to the  servicing
engineer (me in this case). Thus, making a small modification  to disable it
during normal operation would improve the quality of the  10 MHz output
considerably if I am right. Since I don't do ECL design  on a daily basis, I
will have to ponder a bit in order to come up with  a good method of 
acheiving
this.



Hi Magnus,
 
yes, seems this circuit needs to go. Let me know how you disable it.
 
Thanks,
Said



** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-13 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 7/13/2007 14:09:43 Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

probes), trimming up the 200 MHz multiplier chain. I shifted it  down from
17 ps RMS to 3.9-4.0 ps RMS. Most of the trimmings where on  the 200 MHz part
where as the 50 MHz part where fairly clean already  from start.

Hi Magnus,
 
I sent spectrum plots of the 10MHz 5370B output to this list earlier, the  
output is very sad. It's extremely dirty and jittery (well, compared to the 4ps 
 
noise you got, and compared to what the 10811 can deliver).
 
After calibration to 4ps, what does your 5370B unit read for it's  internal 
RMS noise now?
 
bye,
Said



** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-13 Thread John Miles
I don't see much of anything around 5 MHz offsets (attached)...

-- john, KE5FX

 However, I was quite supprised to notice that there is alot of
 modulation on
 the 10 MHz output. The histogram shows two distinct gaussian
 bells and when
 checking the high-frequency modulation it showed a 5 MHz modulation. The
 spectrum analyzer clearly shows the 5 MHz output.

 I will make more investigation to the source of that 5 MHz, but
 it is annoying.
 If it is a property that my 5370B shares with others, then it
 will certainly be
 a limiting factor for self-referenced jitter measures as well as
 use of the
 output for low-jitter measures.

 I think the main source of sub-10 MHz clocks is the divide down on the CPU
 board A9. It generates control signals which is sent along the
 motherboard so
 there is alot of chance to jump over and infect the output buffer.

 Could you please have a look with a spectrum analyzer on your 10
 MHz output.
 I have not checked how it behaves with external 10 MHz applied.

attachment: 5370.gif___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-13 Thread Magnus Danielson
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:16:38 EDT
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Said,

 I sent spectrum plots of the 10MHz 5370B output to this list earlier, the  
 output is very sad. It's extremely dirty and jittery (well, compared to the
 4ps noise you got, and compared to what the 10811 can deliver).

OK. So you have seen it too. I will ponder a little about if there is a cure
for it. Fortunatly the Frequency Buffer Board is fairly easy to get to.

I'll think I'll handgranade a hole on the lab-bench and pop the lid there.

 After calibration to 4ps, what does your 5370B unit read for it's  internal 
 RMS noise now?

Still annoyingly high. Don't remember the actual number. It was jumping around
like hell. I was not doing it properly thought, so I will redo it later
tonight.

I'll also see what kid of numbers I can get from good sources. There is
plenty to pick from here at home.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

2007-07-13 Thread Didier Juges
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Magnus,

My first 5370A had severe distortion on the 10 MHz output, but in my case.
It looked like 30 MHz with some 10 MHz component (no 5 MHz), and was
otherwise stable. It turned out some of the capacitors in the output filter
of the amplifier board had cold solder joints (not unusual on these units),
causing the tank circuit to resonate at 30 MHz instead of 10. Once reflowed,
all went back to normal (except that did not fix the bad socket problem, but
that's another issue :-)

Didier KO4BB

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 4:04 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5370B jitter

Hi fellow time-nuts!

As my vacation started this evening, I spent some time in the lab (at work,
since that's where I find my Wavecrest and it has better selection of active
probes), trimming up the 200 MHz multiplier chain. I shifted it down from
17 ps RMS to 3.9-4.0 ps RMS. Most of the trimmings where on the 200 MHz part
where as the 50 MHz part where fairly clean already from start.

I may be able to tweak the jitter of the 200 MHz down further, but it would
require more work than my rather quick-and-dirty approach.

However, I was quite supprised to notice that there is alot of modulation on
the 10 MHz output. The histogram shows two distinct gaussian bells and when
checking the high-frequency modulation it showed a 5 MHz modulation. The
spectrum analyzer clearly shows the 5 MHz output.

I will make more investigation to the source of that 5 MHz, but it is
annoying.
If it is a property that my 5370B shares with others, then it will certainly
be
a limiting factor for self-referenced jitter measures as well as use of the
output for low-jitter measures.

I think the main source of sub-10 MHz clocks is the divide down on the CPU
board A9. It generates control signals which is sent along the motherboard
so
there is alot of chance to jump over and infect the output buffer.

Could you please have a look with a spectrum analyzer on your 10 MHz output.
I have not checked how it behaves with external 10 MHz applied.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.