Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-08 Thread Rob Kimberley
Got this post 5 times - you still getting aftershocks??

:-)

Rob K

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Steve Rooke
Sent: 07 September 2010 11:06 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

Burt,

On 8 September 2010 01:45, Burt I. Weiner b...@att.net wrote:
 Steve,

 Depending on the type of antenna used for your GPS, you might want to 
 check the Zenith or vertical angle, and if possible, compare that to 
 pre-quake positioning.  Your antenna may now be seeing a change in 
 multipath from some nearby environmental change (no pun intended under 
 the circumstances) that could cause a difference in reflected signals
arriving at the antenna.

With that in mind I've just changed the default 10 deg elevation mask angle
to 30 deg and will see what effects that has. Looking closely at the antenna
mounting I cannot see any change in it's angle or position but there may
have been some movement of this area as we are on an artificial bank
abutting the wetland wildfowl park. What I really need is a real GPS survey
system to determine my correct location.

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local 
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was 
 measuring the movement between Southern California mountains using 
 lazers.  While this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the
willies.

Yes, it really brings it home that we live on just the skin of a rice
pudding. This sort of thing must be a nightmare for the ground stations in
control of the GPS system. What happens if the 0 deg meridian (used to be
the Greenwich meridian) physically moves, do they account for this I wonder.
Considering that the American continent and Europe/Africa are constantly
moving apart, and Asia and the Americas are moving closer, this must mean
that the position of basically most places on the Earth are constantly
changing anyway. Makes you feel like saying, where am I today.

73,
Steve ZL3TUV

 Burt, K6OQK


 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:08:31 +1200
 From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Freestanding mast


 Well, Steve has been experiencing a LOT of after-shocks, some of 
 which are still big enough to move things around and I found I had to 
 grab hold of my cup of tea to stop it shaking onto the floor last 
 night. In fact these after-shocks are still opening up new cracks in 
 roads and causing buildings to fall.

 As for my height position, I have run a few surveys but I'm getting 
 varying readings and I wonder if the after-shocks are messing up the 
 survey results. The latest one which was during a fairly stable 
 period was 6.8 MSL.

 The mast could have sunk a bit or even this whole area could have 
 done as I live on reclaimed marsh-land. My Mothers 3 year old house 
 looks like it has sunk a bit at one and and risen at the other, ie. 
 it looks like it has tipped slightly as her house is built on a 
 concrete pontoon.

 It wouldn't surprise me if they adjust the height of MSL but I would 
 have thought they would have moved it the other way in an attempt to 
 forestall fears of the effects of Global Warming.

 Regards from Quake City,
 Steve

 Burt I. Weiner Associates
 Broadcast Technical Services
 Glendale, California  U.S.A.
 b...@att.net
 www.biwa.cc
 K6OQK

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-08 Thread Steve Rooke
On 9 September 2010 00:51, Rob Kimberley r...@timing-consultants.com wrote:
 Got this post 5 times - you still getting aftershocks??

That must be level 5 on the posting scale:)

Don't know why you got 5 copies of it as I had no problem sending it
but my apologies to all if you've received multiple copies of this.

And yes, we are still receiving after-shocks but they seem to have
quietened down in the last 24 hours.

Steve

 :-)

 Rob K

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Steve Rooke
 Sent: 07 September 2010 11:06 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

 Burt,

 On 8 September 2010 01:45, Burt I. Weiner b...@att.net wrote:
 Steve,

 Depending on the type of antenna used for your GPS, you might want to
 check the Zenith or vertical angle, and if possible, compare that to
 pre-quake positioning.  Your antenna may now be seeing a change in
 multipath from some nearby environmental change (no pun intended under
 the circumstances) that could cause a difference in reflected signals
 arriving at the antenna.

 With that in mind I've just changed the default 10 deg elevation mask angle
 to 30 deg and will see what effects that has. Looking closely at the antenna
 mounting I cannot see any change in it's angle or position but there may
 have been some movement of this area as we are on an artificial bank
 abutting the wetland wildfowl park. What I really need is a real GPS survey
 system to determine my correct location.

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was
 measuring the movement between Southern California mountains using
 lazers.  While this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the
 willies.

 Yes, it really brings it home that we live on just the skin of a rice
 pudding. This sort of thing must be a nightmare for the ground stations in
 control of the GPS system. What happens if the 0 deg meridian (used to be
 the Greenwich meridian) physically moves, do they account for this I wonder.
 Considering that the American continent and Europe/Africa are constantly
 moving apart, and Asia and the Americas are moving closer, this must mean
 that the position of basically most places on the Earth are constantly
 changing anyway. Makes you feel like saying, where am I today.

 73,
 Steve ZL3TUV

 Burt, K6OQK


 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:08:31 +1200
 From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Freestanding mast


 Well, Steve has been experiencing a LOT of after-shocks, some of
 which are still big enough to move things around and I found I had to
 grab hold of my cup of tea to stop it shaking onto the floor last
 night. In fact these after-shocks are still opening up new cracks in
 roads and causing buildings to fall.

 As for my height position, I have run a few surveys but I'm getting
 varying readings and I wonder if the after-shocks are messing up the
 survey results. The latest one which was during a fairly stable
 period was 6.8 MSL.

 The mast could have sunk a bit or even this whole area could have
 done as I live on reclaimed marsh-land. My Mothers 3 year old house
 looks like it has sunk a bit at one and and risen at the other, ie.
 it looks like it has tipped slightly as her house is built on a
 concrete pontoon.

 It wouldn't surprise me if they adjust the height of MSL but I would
 have thought they would have moved it the other way in an attempt to
 forestall fears of the effects of Global Warming.

 Regards from Quake City,
 Steve

 Burt I. Weiner Associates
 Broadcast Technical Services
 Glendale, California  U.S.A.
 b...@att.net
 www.biwa.cc
 K6OQK

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 --
 Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
 The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
 - Einstein

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread Hal Murray

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was  measuring
 the movement between Southern California mountains using  lazers.  While
 this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the willies. 

I'm in Silicon Valley.  There is a big USGS group here.

They used to have a laser setup between Black Mountain and Mt Diablo which 
are on opposite sides of the fault, roughly 50 miles apart.  They used to fly 
a helicopter along the beam, measuring the temperature so they could get a 
more accurate answer.

Fault motion is ballpark of 1 inch per year, the same as your fingernails 
grow.  So they would want to measure the distance to a (small) fraction of 
that.

I did a quick search, but I didn't find the speed of light as a function of 
temperature.  50 miles is 3E6 inches so 1 PPM would be a big deal.


I think they do it with GPS now.




-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread Tom Holmes
Hal...

Maybe they were actually interested in the humidity as a source of phase
distortion or attenuation?

Maybe they wanted to prove that the temperature did not cause a problem?

Or maybe just a government paid-for helicopter ride.

Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Tipp City, OH
EM79


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Hal Murray
 Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:57 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...
 
 
  Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
  broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was
measuring
  the movement between Southern California mountains using  lazers.  While
  this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the willies.
 
 I'm in Silicon Valley.  There is a big USGS group here.
 
 They used to have a laser setup between Black Mountain and Mt Diablo which
 are on opposite sides of the fault, roughly 50 miles apart.  They used to
fly
 a helicopter along the beam, measuring the temperature so they could get a
 more accurate answer.
 
 Fault motion is ballpark of 1 inch per year, the same as your fingernails
 grow.  So they would want to measure the distance to a (small) fraction of
 that.
 
 I did a quick search, but I didn't find the speed of light as a function
of
 temperature.  50 miles is 3E6 inches so 1 PPM would be a big deal.
 
 
 I think they do it with GPS now.
 
 
 
 
 --
 These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread Hal Murray

 Maybe they were actually interested in the humidity as a source of phase
 distortion or attenuation?

 Maybe they wanted to prove that the temperature did not cause a problem? 

 Or maybe just a government paid-for helicopter ride.


Geologists are interested in plate motions over extended periods of time 
(years) so there should be lots of opportunities for rides.  Are they 
creeping or jumping?  How far?

You can measure motion along a fault if you can measure the distance between 
two places on opposite sides of the fault.  In this area, the San Andreas 
splits into several faults.  That pair of mountains straddles most of them.

Distance is speed-of-light times time.  They can measure the round trip time.

The speed of light in air depends upon the density which depends upon 
temperature.  I think I could work out the details with enough time/work, but 
a quick search didn't find it.

Yes, humidity probably is important too.

I don't think they are interested in attenuation as long as they have a 
strong enough signal to get a clean reading on the time.



-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread Steve Rooke
Burt,

On 8 September 2010 01:45, Burt I. Weiner b...@att.net wrote:
 Steve,

 Depending on the type of antenna used for your GPS, you might want to check
 the Zenith or vertical angle, and if possible, compare that to pre-quake
 positioning.  Your antenna may now be seeing a change in multipath from some
 nearby environmental change (no pun intended under the circumstances) that
 could cause a difference in reflected signals arriving at the antenna.

With that in mind I've just changed the default 10 deg elevation mask
angle to 30 deg and will see what effects that has. Looking closely at
the antenna mounting I cannot see any change in it's angle or position
but there may have been some movement of this area as we are on an
artificial bank abutting the wetland wildfowl park. What I really need
is a real GPS survey system to determine my correct location.

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was measuring
 the movement between Southern California mountains using lazers.  While this
 was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the willies.

Yes, it really brings it home that we live on just the skin of a rice
pudding. This sort of thing must be a nightmare for the ground
stations in control of the GPS system. What happens if the 0 deg
meridian (used to be the Greenwich meridian) physically moves, do they
account for this I wonder. Considering that the American continent and
Europe/Africa are constantly moving apart, and Asia and the Americas
are moving closer, this must mean that the position of basically most
places on the Earth are constantly changing anyway. Makes you feel
like saying, where am I today.

73,
Steve ZL3TUV

 Burt, K6OQK


 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:08:31 +1200
 From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Freestanding mast


 Well, Steve has been experiencing a LOT of after-shocks, some of which
 are still big enough to move things around and I found I had to grab
 hold of my cup of tea to stop it shaking onto the floor last night. In
 fact these after-shocks are still opening up new cracks in roads and
 causing buildings to fall.

 As for my height position, I have run a few surveys but I'm getting
 varying readings and I wonder if the after-shocks are messing up the
 survey results. The latest one which was during a fairly stable period
 was 6.8 MSL.

 The mast could have sunk a bit or even this whole area could have done
 as I live on reclaimed marsh-land. My Mothers 3 year old house looks
 like it has sunk a bit at one and and risen at the other, ie. it looks
 like it has tipped slightly as her house is built on a concrete
 pontoon.

 It wouldn't surprise me if they adjust the height of MSL but I would
 have thought they would have moved it the other way in an attempt to
 forestall fears of the effects of Global Warming.

 Regards from Quake City,
 Steve

 Burt I. Weiner Associates
 Broadcast Technical Services
 Glendale, California  U.S.A.
 b...@att.net
 www.biwa.cc
 K6OQK

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread Joseph M Gwinn
time-nuts-boun...@febo.com wrote on 09/07/2010 02:57:07 PM:

 From:
 
 Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net
 
 To:
 
 Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com
 
 Date:
 
 09/07/2010 03:15 PM
 
 Subject:
 
 Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...
 
 Sent by:
 
 time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 
 
  Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
  broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that 
 was  measuring
  the movement between Southern California mountains using 
 lazers.  While
  this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the willies. 
 
 I'm in Silicon Valley.  There is a big USGS group here.
 
 They used to have a laser setup between Black Mountain and Mt 
 Diablo which 
 are on opposite sides of the fault, roughly 50 miles apart. 
 They used to fly 
 a helicopter along the beam, measuring the temperature so they 
 could get a 
 more accurate answer.
 
 Fault motion is ballpark of 1 inch per year, the same as your 
 fingernails 
 grow.  So they would want to measure the distance to a (small) 
 fraction of 
 that.
 
 I did a quick search, but I didn't find the speed of light as a
 function of 
 temperature.  50 miles is 3E6 inches so 1 PPM would be a big deal.

It is about -0.9 ppm per degree Kelvin at 20 C, for 1310 nm radiation.

This comes from the NIST calculator at 
http://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Abstract.asp, which calculates phase 
velocity (but not group velocity yet).

This is also discussed in Appendix C of ASME B89.4.19-2006 (Performance 
evaluation of laser-based spherical coordinate measurement systems), which 
is available gratis on the web.  Both phase and group velocity are 
discussed.  Google to find the electrons.

Joe Gwinn


 I think they do it with GPS now.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
 listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-07 Thread jimlux

Hal Murray wrote:

Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was  measuring
the movement between Southern California mountains using  lazers.  While
this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the willies. 


I'm in Silicon Valley.  There is a big USGS group here.

They used to have a laser setup between Black Mountain and Mt Diablo which 
are on opposite sides of the fault, roughly 50 miles apart.  They used to fly 
a helicopter along the beam, measuring the temperature so they could get a 
more accurate answer.


Fault motion is ballpark of 1 inch per year, the same as your fingernails 
grow.  So they would want to measure the distance to a (small) fraction of 
that.


I did a quick search, but I didn't find the speed of light as a function of 
temperature.  50 miles is 3E6 inches so 1 PPM would be a big deal.





it's a big problem..
look for variation in Refractive Index with temperature (and pressure 
and humidity)..


I was working on an 8 GHz antenna design (essentially an interferometer) 
that in order to be tested needed the source to be at least 27km away to 
meet the plane wave approximation. Can't do it outdoors (or indoors, 
even...).


CERN has similar problems aligning the beamline with a laser theodolite, 
and that's in a tunnel underground. I'm thinking they needed mm 
transverse precision over km distances (i.e. 1 ppm)



A 1ppm change in RI is caused by
1degree C
0.4kPa pressure (3mm Hg)
50% RH at 35C

It's pronounced enough that you get tropospheric ducting on VHF (e.g. 
sometimes, repeaters on Mt Wilson above Los Angeles can hear people down 
in San Diego, below the radio horizon)


http://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp

go for it...




I think they do it with GPS now.







___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.