Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 130, Issue 27

2015-05-20 Thread Björn Gabrielsson
Hi Bob,

You are confusing the readers here.

  1) zero altitude relative the WGS84/GPS ellipsoid are often tens of
meters over or below sea level, depending on your location.

  2) zero altitude relative to a geoid (EGM96 or something else) is very
close to sea level.

Then if you think of the ellipsoid as a second order model of the geoid...
we can start comfusing people again.

--

Björn

 Hi

 The gotcha is that the GPS numbers are related to a geoid model and not to
 sea level.
 You can indeed find points that are “underwater” based on the geoid,
 but quite dry in
 real life (and vice-versa).

 Bob
 On May 19, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I would buy that (Google Maps being off) except that I'm less than 2
 miles from the SF bay and -5M would have me underwater. That may well
 happen but not for a few years at least. Also the Arbiter does match
 Google maps pretty closely. It doesn't really matter a lot, just a
 curiosity.
 Demian

 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:12:58 -0400
 From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
  time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Height Error
 Message-ID: 1ae37b6b-35fd-4c5f-95d6-01316d6c4...@n1k.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Hi

 The simple answer is that Google maps may or may not be correct. There
 are a lot
 of examples of them being off by 10M or more. That said, my *guess*
 would be that the
 Thunderbolt is closer to the truth.

 Bob

 On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is
 old but
 it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It
 has
 the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but
 I'm
 not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.



 I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both
 to do
 a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps
 indicate is
 my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
 underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as
 -6M.
 What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
 operation as a frequency standard in any way?





 Demian Martin

 San Leandro, CA 94577

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 130, Issue 27

2015-05-20 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

One of our standing jokes when we lived by the shore was that we actually 
lived underwater. The GPS routinely put is 30 to 50’ below sea level ….

Bob

 On May 20, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Björn Gabrielsson b...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
 
 Hi Bob,
 
 You are confusing the readers here.
 
  1) zero altitude relative the WGS84/GPS ellipsoid are often tens of
 meters over or below sea level, depending on your location.
 
  2) zero altitude relative to a geoid (EGM96 or something else) is very
 close to sea level.
 
 Then if you think of the ellipsoid as a second order model of the geoid...
 we can start comfusing people again.
 
 --
 
Björn
 
 Hi
 
 The gotcha is that the GPS numbers are related to a geoid model and not to
 sea level.
 You can indeed find points that are “underwater” based on the geoid,
 but quite dry in
 real life (and vice-versa).
 
 Bob
 On May 19, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 I would buy that (Google Maps being off) except that I'm less than 2
 miles from the SF bay and -5M would have me underwater. That may well
 happen but not for a few years at least. Also the Arbiter does match
 Google maps pretty closely. It doesn't really matter a lot, just a
 curiosity.
Demian
 
 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:12:58 -0400
 From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Height Error
 Message-ID: 1ae37b6b-35fd-4c5f-95d6-01316d6c4...@n1k.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Hi
 
 The simple answer is that Google maps may or may not be correct. There
 are a lot
 of examples of them being off by 10M or more. That said, my *guess*
 would be that the
 Thunderbolt is closer to the truth.
 
 Bob
 
 On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is
 old but
 it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It
 has
 the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but
 I'm
 not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.
 
 
 
 I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both
 to do
 a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps
 indicate is
 my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
 underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as
 -6M.
 What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
 operation as a frequency standard in any way?
 
 
 
 
 
 Demian Martin
 
 San Leandro, CA 94577
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 130, Issue 27

2015-05-19 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The gotcha is that the GPS numbers are related to a geoid model and not to sea 
level. 
You can indeed find points that are “underwater” based on the geoid, but quite 
dry in 
real life (and vice-versa). 

Bob
 On May 19, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I would buy that (Google Maps being off) except that I'm less than 2 miles 
 from the SF bay and -5M would have me underwater. That may well happen but 
 not for a few years at least. Also the Arbiter does match Google maps pretty 
 closely. It doesn't really matter a lot, just a curiosity.
 Demian
 
 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:12:58 -0400
 From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Height Error
 Message-ID: 1ae37b6b-35fd-4c5f-95d6-01316d6c4...@n1k.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Hi
 
 The simple answer is that Google maps may or may not be correct. There are a 
 lot 
 of examples of them being off by 10M or more. That said, my *guess* would be 
 that the 
 Thunderbolt is closer to the truth.
 
 Bob
 
 On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is old but
 it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It has
 the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but I'm
 not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.
 
 
 
 I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both to do
 a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps indicate is
 my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
 underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as -6M.
 What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
 operation as a frequency standard in any way?
 
 
 
 
 
 Demian Martin
 
 San Leandro, CA 94577
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 130, Issue 27

2015-05-19 Thread Demian Martin
I would buy that (Google Maps being off) except that I'm less than 2 miles from 
the SF bay and -5M would have me underwater. That may well happen but not for a 
few years at least. Also the Arbiter does match Google maps pretty closely. It 
doesn't really matter a lot, just a curiosity.
 Demian

Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:12:58 -0400
From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Height Error
Message-ID: 1ae37b6b-35fd-4c5f-95d6-01316d6c4...@n1k.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi

The simple answer is that Google maps may or may not be correct. There are a 
lot 
of examples of them being off by 10M or more. That said, my *guess* would be 
that the 
Thunderbolt is closer to the truth.

Bob

 On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is old but
 it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It has
 the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but I'm
 not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.
 
 
 
 I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both to do
 a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps indicate is
 my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
 underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as -6M.
 What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
 operation as a frequency standard in any way?
 
 
 
 
 
 Demian Martin
 
 San Leandro, CA 94577

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 130, Issue 27

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Martindale
Which altitude do you have the Thunderbolt set up to report?

If you have the datum set to WGS-84, the Thunderbolt can report either HAE
(height above ellipsoid) or MSL (height above the geoid model) in its
serial output.  The choice is controlled by bit 2 of byte 0 of the 0x35
command packet.  This can be stored in EEPROM, which determines the
power-up default.

HAE is mathematically simpler to calculate but bears only an approximate
relationship to actual sea level.  MSL requires some sort of table (inside
the GPS receiver) to specify the geoid model, but since it's a fit to the
actual Earth, the altitude is more likely to agree to what you think of as
altitude.

Many GPS receivers provide a choice of which altitude they report in their
output stream, so when comparing two receivers you need to check that both
the datum and the HAE/MSL altitude choices are configured the same.

This should not have any effect on timing.  The GPS receiver knows where it
is in Cartesian coordinates in all cases.  Your choice of map datum
controls the conversion to latitude and longitude that the receiver
reports, while the choice of HEA/MSL controls the conversion to reported
altitude, but these choices should affect this output conversion only.

- Dave


  On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin demianm@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is old
 but
  it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It
 has
  the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but I'm
  not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.
 
 
 
  I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both
 to do
  a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps indicate
 is
  my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
  underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as -6M.
  What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
  operation as a frequency standard in any way?
 
 
 
 
 
  Demian Martin
 
  San Leandro, CA 94577

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.