Hi Matthias,
There has been interference reported and resolved between 23cm and Galileo,
which have signals in the 23cm band.
/Björn
Sent from my Phone
> On 12 Jul 2022, at 09:20, Matthias Welwarsky via time-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if you're worried about in-band interference, the 23cm HAM radio band is
> reasonably close to the L1 GPS frequency. When I was still active in packet
> radio back in the days, our digipeater DB0DAR lost an interlink due to
> interference with a precision GPS receiver in use by another university
> institute. We had to shut it down. I think they operated a DGPS site at the
> time and our link traffic caused errors in the correction data. Or something.
>
> BR,
> Matthias
>
>> On Montag, 11. Juli 2022 01:19:18 CEST skipp Isaham via time-nuts wrote:
>> Hello to the Group,
>>
>> I'd like to get some opinions and war stories regarding GPS reliability at
>> high RF level and elevation locations.
>>
>> Background: Three different hill-top GPS receivers, all different types,
>> using different antennas mounted on an outside fixiture, plain view of the
>> open sky, all stopped working.
>>
>> Test antennas were brought in and placed on a fixture well away from the
>> original antennas, the recevers went back in to capture and lock.
>>
>> From what I understand, the original antennas are what I would call straight
>> preamp with no pre-selection / filtering.
>>
>> The ordered and now inbound replacements are said to contain a SAW filter
>> system. It is the intent of the client to just place these "improved
>> antennas" in to service and get on with life.
>>
>> I would suspect a GPS antenna (and receiver) could be subject to RF overload
>> or blocking, however, we're assuming nothing major has changed at the site,
>> nor any nearby location. One might think there are more GPS receivers
>> being pushed out of reliable operation by the world around them, I'm just
>> not hearing those stories from a lot of people using them (GPS receivers).
>>
>> Any new install GPS receiver antenna ordered will/should contain some
>> pre-selection to potentially avoid a problem, even some years down the
>> road? Seems like that's where things are going... no more off the shelf,
>> wide band, (hot) preamplified GPS antennas in busy locations?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any related comments and/or opions ...
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> skipp
>>
>> skipp025 at jah who dot calm
>> ___
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com