Re: [Tinycc-devel] Page´s reboot
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Luis Alejandro Muzzachiodi lamuzzachi...@yahoo.com wrote: it´s available. I know this isn't the same as .org or .net but could be better than the original-dead page. And it´s free ;-) What would be even cooler: tiny.cc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.cc (Ah, damn - it's already take for a URL-shortener) -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Page´s reboot
If needed, I can buy the domain. Only lets me know what is the best domain name for the project. 2013/2/17 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Luis Alejandro Muzzachiodi lamuzzachi...@yahoo.com wrote: it´s available. I know this isn't the same as .org or .net but could be better than the original-dead page. And it´s free ;-) What would be even cooler: tiny.cc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.cc (Ah, damn - it's already take for a URL-shortener) -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel -- *Alexandre Teles* Graduando de Eng. Elétrica / Desenvolvedor Web e Desktop Tel: (71)9152-6094 (TIM) - (71)8830-4286 (OI) - (71)8237-9748 (CLARO - VIBER) - (71)9682-9333 (VIVO) Skype: kabbalista Facebook: http://fb.com/alex.kabbal ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Page´s reboot
And, of course, I can provide the host. 2013/2/17 Alexandre Teles atele...@gmail.com If needed, I can buy the domain. Only lets me know what is the best domain name for the project. 2013/2/17 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Luis Alejandro Muzzachiodi lamuzzachi...@yahoo.com wrote: it´s available. I know this isn't the same as .org or .net but could be better than the original-dead page. And it´s free ;-) What would be even cooler: tiny.cc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.cc (Ah, damn - it's already take for a URL-shortener) -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel -- *Alexandre Teles* Graduando de Eng. Elétrica / Desenvolvedor Web e Desktop Tel: (71)9152-6094 (TIM) - (71)8830-4286 (OI) - (71)8237-9748 (CLARO - VIBER) - (71)9682-9333 (VIVO) Skype: kabbalista Facebook: http://fb.com/alex.kabbal -- *Alexandre Teles* Graduando de Eng. Elétrica / Desenvolvedor Web e Desktop Tel: (71)9152-6094 (TIM) - (71)8830-4286 (OI) - (71)8237-9748 (CLARO - VIBER) - (71)9682-9333 (VIVO) Skype: kabbalista Facebook: http://fb.com/alex.kabbal ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Tinycc-devel] License of individual files in tests/tests2/*
Hi Milutin, in tests/tests2/LICENSE, you wrote: The tests in this directory are either directly copied from the picoc project or are subsequently modified and added to for the purpose of TinyCC project. All these modifications are licensed under the same terms as TinyCC as specified in the file COPYING. This means the file you modified are redistributed under LPGL-2.1+ (as specified in COPYING) since BSD-3-clause is compatible with LGPL-2.1+ but the non-modified files are still under the picoc license (BSD-3-clause). That's perfectly fine of course since we can redistribute the whole (tinycc) under the LGPL-2.1+. But for the purpose of having a better view of what license are under each file, I'd like know which files you modified. Would you mind telling me this information? Best regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?
Le samedi 16 février 2013 21:17:32, Michael Matz a écrit : __STDC_HOSTED__ : not set (incorrectly, it should probably be set to 1 given that tcc assumes a normal main() and that the rest of the provided facilities is provided by the C library not under tcc control) So what do you think of the attached patch? Best regards, Thomas From fe64a4d00512740b3cd3a8faa49ba7c908e86944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:44:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Define __STDC_HOSTED__ Quoting Michael Matz on tinycc-devel: __STDC_HOSTED__ : not set (incorrectly, it should probably be set to 1 given that tcc assumes a normal main() and that the rest of the provided facilities is provided by the C library not under tcc control) --- libtcc.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/libtcc.c b/libtcc.c index 6b8f237..b138fd9 100644 --- a/libtcc.c +++ b/libtcc.c @@ -924,6 +924,7 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void) /* standard defines */ tcc_define_symbol(s, __STDC__, NULL); tcc_define_symbol(s, __STDC_VERSION__, 199901L); +tcc_define_symbol(s, __STDC_HOSTED__, NULL); /* target defines */ #if defined(TCC_TARGET_I386) -- 1.7.10.4 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?
Am 17.02.2013 19:46, schrieb Thomas Preud'homme: Le samedi 16 février 2013 21:17:32, Michael Matz a écrit : __STDC_HOSTED__ : not set (incorrectly, it should probably be set to 1 given that tcc assumes a normal main() and that the rest of the provided facilities is provided by the C library not under tcc control) So what do you think of the attached patch? Makes sense IMO. Ciao, Michael. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
