I am sorry, I do not have expressed good I mean. I want you sure, is tcc
correct or gcc msvc correctly. If the gcc msvc correct, I want to fix it.
Best regards
Jiang
Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr编写：
Le dimanche 13 juillet 2014, 22:12:39 jiang a écrit :
Hello everyone!
(s-a = (s-b = (s-c = n + 4)));
gcc msvc:
-- 30 / 30 / 126 // Because the return value is left
tcc
-- 254 / 30 / 126 // Because the return is the right value
Since it works for the last two values I don't think it's that. It simply
looks like tcc compute n + 4 (254) and then tries to store it in each field
independently. It's a folding issue. Tcc records 254 in a CValue associated
with the SValue for n + 4. The problem is how this is propagated (folded) to
the three field access.
Shall tcc assignment modify what? Same with gccmsvc.
Yes, gcc and msvc are definitely right here.
Best regards,
Thomas
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
