Re: [Tinycc-devel] rev 8615bb4 makes build become nosier
rev 8615bb4 makes tcc complaining #pragma push_macro and #pragma pop_macro, please fix or silencing it. A right fix is to implement a #pragma push_macro and #pragma pop_macro Otherwise a compiled program will be wrong. If you think that using this pragmas in the mingw headers is not needed, then remove this pragmas from headers. Removing a warning about unknown pragmas is the last thing todo. 2015-04-16 3:06 GMT+03:00, Roy Tam roy...@gmail.com: Hello list, rev 8615bb4 makes tcc complaining #pragma push_macro and #pragma pop_macro, please fix or silencing it. Thanks. Regards, Roy ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Dollar Sign in Identifiers Extension
Brilliant thank you so much for the help Sergey and Ramsay. On 16/04/2015 09:27, Sergey Korshunoff wrote: Hi! A working version of the patch (addon) is attached. A changed part is in tccasm.c Before a change there was error while compiling libtcc1 on x86 I think a patch can be submitted to the mob. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Dollar Sign in Identifiers Extension
Hi! A working version of the patch (addon) is attached. A changed part is in tccasm.c Before a change there was error while compiling libtcc1 on x86 I think a patch can be submitted to the mob. 02-dollars-in-identifiers-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] TCC arm64 back end
Hi, On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Nope. Try it for yourself: Huh, indeed. IMHO that's inconsistent with the symbol resolution behaviour of GNU ld (only looking in level0 libs for symbols, not in those DT_NEEDED by them, unless --copy-dt-needed-entries is active), but so be it. I did the test with gcc so I was describing ld's behavior. Yes, in case it wasn't obvious I agreed with you, I just think ld's behaviour in this aspect is IMHO inconsistent with behaviour in a slightly related aspect. Got a patch and would appreciate some feedback. Only tested on x86-64 so far [1] so I would also appreciate testing on other targets (even i386). Looks good to me. Ciao, Michael. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
