Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] improving solaris/illumos support
> Hello David, > Funny, I considered to try this port last year, unfortunately my Solaris VM is > broken I only have true Solaris 10 sparc machines (with of course No chances > it > works on a sparc CPU). > What is the status of Solaris port after this patch? It is the initial step for proper support. It would take further steps to fix tests (e.g. no support for some linkers features, etc) thus simplify the reviews. > Does it works, I think you have some ELF reloc issues (a big classic for a new > port), do you? > You missed the correct values for: > #elif defined(__sun) > +#define BOUND_TID_TYPE pid_t > +#define BOUND_GET_TIDsyscall (SYS_) True but I did not port bound check, anyway there is no equivalent for gettid, part the classic pthread_self/getpid. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] improving solaris/illumos support
Hi, here a patch to add this platform as a new target.
From 38196801851fa941258360e5786d1ed45078d2fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:57:58 +
Subject: [PATCH] illumos/solaris improving support
---
Makefile | 3 +++
configure | 19 +++
conftest.c | 1 +
tcc.c | 2 ++
tcc.h | 3 +++
tccpp.c| 2 ++
tccrun.c | 8 ++--
tests/Makefile | 2 ++
8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 9216b0d..9041808 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_arm_vfp) += -DTCC_ARM_VFP
NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_arm64) += -DTCC_TARGET_ARM64
NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_riscv64) += -DTCC_TARGET_RISCV64
NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_BSD) += -DTARGETOS_$(TARGETOS)
+NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_SunOS) += -DTARGETOS_$(TARGETOS)
NATIVE_DEFINES_$(CONFIG_pie) += -DCONFIG_TCC_PIE
NATIVE_DEFINES_no_$(CONFIG_bcheck) += -DCONFIG_TCC_BCHECK=0
NATIVE_DEFINES_no_$(CONFIG_backtrace) += -DCONFIG_TCC_BACKTRACE=0
@@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ NATIVE_DEFINES += $(NATIVE_DEFINES_yes) $(NATIVE_DEFINES_no_no)
DEF-i386 = -DTCC_TARGET_I386
DEF-i386-win32 = -DTCC_TARGET_I386 -DTCC_TARGET_PE
DEF-i386-OpenBSD = $(DEF-i386) -DTARGETOS_OpenBSD
+DEF-i386-SunOS = $(DEF-i386) -DTARGETOS_SunOS
DEF-x86_64 = -DTCC_TARGET_X86_64
DEF-x86_64-win32 = -DTCC_TARGET_X86_64 -DTCC_TARGET_PE
DEF-x86_64-osx = -DTCC_TARGET_X86_64 -DTCC_TARGET_MACHO
@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ DEF-c67= -DTCC_TARGET_C67 -w # disable warnigs
DEF-x86_64-FreeBSD = $(DEF-x86_64) -DTARGETOS_FreeBSD
DEF-x86_64-NetBSD = $(DEF-x86_64) -DTARGETOS_NetBSD
DEF-x86_64-OpenBSD = $(DEF-x86_64) -DTARGETOS_OpenBSD
+DEF-x86_64-SunOS = $(DEF-x86_64) -DTARGETOS_SunOS
DEF-$(NATIVE_TARGET) = $(NATIVE_DEFINES)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index f05b700..f34f89a 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ case $targetos in
DragonFly|OpenBSD|FreeBSD|NetBSD)
confvars="$confvars BSD ldl=no"
;;
+ SunOS)
+confvars="$confvars SunOS"
+;;
*)
;;
esac
@@ -463,20 +466,20 @@ DLLSUF=$DLLSUF
EOF
print_inc() {
- local v="$2"
- if test -n "$v"; then
-test "$3" = "num" || v="\"$v\""
+ vinc="$2"
+ if test -n "$vinc"; then
+test "$3" = "num" || vinc="\"$vinc\""
echo "#ifndef $1" >> $TMPH
-echo "# define $1 $v" >> $TMPH
+echo "# define $1 $vinc" >> $TMPH
echo "#endif" >> $TMPH
fi
}
print_mak() {
- local v="$2"
- if test -n "$v"; then
-test "$3" = "num" || v="\"\\\"$v\\\"\""
-echo "NATIVE_DEFINES+=-D$1=$v" >> config.mak
+ vmak="$2"
+ if test -n "$vmak"; then
+test "$3" = "num" || vmak="\"\\\"$vmak\\\"\""
+echo "NATIVE_DEFINES+=-D$1=$vmak" >> config.mak
fi
}
diff --git a/conftest.c b/conftest.c
index e8e1220..66181a0 100644
--- a/conftest.c
+++ b/conftest.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ const char *platform_macros[] = {
"__FreeBSD_kernel__", "TARGETOS_FreeBSD_kernel",
"__OpenBSD__", "TARGETOS_OpenBSD",
"__NetBSD__", "TARGETOS_NetBSD",
+"__sun","TARGETOS_SunOS",
"__linux__","TARGETOS_Linux",
"__SIZEOF_POINTER__", "PTR_SIZE",
"__SIZEOF_LONG__", "LONG_SIZE",
diff --git a/tcc.c b/tcc.c
index 42a251b..d60dc0b 100644
--- a/tcc.c
+++ b/tcc.c
@@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ static const char version[] =
" OpenBSD"
#elif TARGETOS_NetBSD
" NetBSD"
+#elif TARGETOS_SunOS
+" Solaris"
#else
" Linux"
#endif
diff --git a/tcc.h b/tcc.h
index ef69ef5..db18f6f 100644
--- a/tcc.h
+++ b/tcc.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#define _DARWIN_C_SOURCE
+#define __EXTENSIONS__
#include "config.h"
#include
@@ -307,6 +308,8 @@ extern long double strtold (const char *__nptr, char **__endptr);
# define CONFIG_TCC_ELFINTERP "/usr/libexec/ld.elf_so"
# elif TARGETOS_OpenBSD
# define CONFIG_TCC_ELFINTERP "/usr/libexec/ld.so"
+# elif TARGETOS_SunOS
+# define CONFIG_TCC_ELFINTERP "/usr/lib/ld.so.1"
# elif defined __GNU__
# define CONFIG_TCC_ELFINTERP "/lib/ld.so"
# elif defined(TCC_TARGET_PE)
diff --git a/tccpp.c b/tccpp.c
index 6b828c9..6299751 100644
--- a/tccpp.c
+++ b/tccpp.c
@@ -3694,6 +3694,8 @@ static const char * const target_os_defs =
"__NetBSD__\0"
# elif TARGETOS_OpenBSD
[Tinycc-devel] Fwd: [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
Hi if nobody objects, I may apply the last aforementioned patch sometime next week. Kind regards. -- Forwarded message - From: David CARLIER Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 18:35 Subject: Re: [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal To: > new version considering feedbacks. Cheers. ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
new version considering feedbacks. Cheers. On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 13:43, David CARLIER wrote: > > Hi here a revised version. > > Cheers. > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 17:38, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > fair enough. thanks. > > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 17:09, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > > > Hi and thanks here a new version of the patchset. > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 00:18, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > > > > > adding few constants for compile time and fetching thread id for bound > > > > check. 0001-freebsd-support-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
Hi here a revised version. Cheers. On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 17:38, David CARLIER wrote: > > fair enough. thanks. > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 17:09, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > Hi and thanks here a new version of the patchset. > > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 00:18, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > > > adding few constants for compile time and fetching thread id for bound > > > check. 0001-freebsd-support-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
fair enough. thanks. On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 17:09, David CARLIER wrote: > > Hi and thanks here a new version of the patchset. > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 00:18, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > adding few constants for compile time and fetching thread id for bound > > check. 0001-freebsd-support-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
Hi and thanks here a new version of the patchset. On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 00:18, David CARLIER wrote: > > adding few constants for compile time and fetching thread id for bound check. 0001-freebsd-support-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] freebsd support update proposal
adding few constants for compile time and fetching thread id for bound check. 0001-freebsd-support-update.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
Here a modified version of the patch, tested on OpenBSD (stable),
FreeBSD and DragonFly.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 16:15, David CARLIER wrote:
>
> Are they with / without the fix ? Because normally the changes would
> address those I saw them too.
>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 16:14, Christian Jullien wrote:
> >
> > Same result, also NetBSD still fails with:
> >
> > -bash-5.0$ ./configure
> > Binary directory/usr/local/bin
> > TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc
> > Library directory /usr/local/lib
> > Include directory /usr/local/include
> > Manual directory/usr/local/share/man
> > Info directory /usr/local/share/info
> > Doc directory /usr/local/share/doc
> > Source path /home/jullien/tinycc
> > C compiler gcc (7.4)
> > Target OS NetBSD
> > CPU x86_64
> > Config ldl=no
> > Creating config.mak and config.h
> > config.h is unchanged
> > -bash-5.0$ gmake
> > gmake[1]: Entering directory '/home/jullien/tinycc/lib'
> > ../tcc -c bt-exe.c -o ../bt-exe.o -B.. -I..
> > In file included from bt-exe.c:6:
> > In file included from ../tccrun.c:21:
> > In file included from ../tcc.h:29:
> > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:37:
> > /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:441: error: #error "No function renaming possible"
> > gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:83: ../bt-exe.o] Error 1
> > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jullien/tinycc/lib'
> > gmake: *** [Makefile:269: libtcc1.a] Error 2
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tinycc-devel
> > [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of
> > Sudipto Mallick
> > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 16:50
> > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
> >
> > Great achievement
> >
> > On OpenBSD x86_64, applied your patch and tried to compile, to get an
> > error that ucontext_t doesn't have uc_rbp as a member; i think that
> > was a typo and would be: sc_rbp. fixing that, it compiled smoothly
> > tried to compile a c file using this newly built tcc fails with crt0.o
> > etc. not found error :(
> >
> > ~smlckz
> >
> > ___
> > Tinycc-devel mailing list
> > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Tinycc-devel mailing list
> > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
From fd91cd9a46528c3efeb7fe44014763cdf6eecf2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:27:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] BSD systems build fixes.
---
lib/bcheck.c | 8
libtcc.c | 6 +-
tcc.h| 11 +++
tccrun.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/bcheck.c b/lib/bcheck.c
index 06c5b60..0fa84ef 100644
--- a/lib/bcheck.c
+++ b/lib/bcheck.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#if !defined(__FreeBSD__) \
&& !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) \
@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@
|| defined(__NetBSD__) \
|| defined(__dietlibc__)
+#include
#define INIT_SEM()
#define EXIT_SEM()
#define WAIT_SEM()
@@ -220,9 +222,15 @@ typedef struct alloca_list_struct {
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE DWORD
#define BOUND_GET_TIDGetCurrentThreadId()
#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__riscv)
+#if defined(__linux__)
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE pid_t
#define BOUND_GET_TIDsyscall (SYS_gettid)
#else
+// Note: each platform has its own thread id api, pthread_self might suffice for starter
+#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int64_t
+#define BOUND_GET_TID(int64_t)(pthread_self())
+#endif
+#else
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int
#define BOUND_GET_TID0
#endif
diff --git a/libtcc.c b/libtcc.c
index 3698632..f7e364f 100644
--- a/libtcc.c
+++ b/libtcc.c
@@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void)
# if defined(__OpenBSD__)
tcc_define_symbol(s, "__OpenBSD__", "__OpenBSD__");
# endif
+# if defined(__DragonFly__)
+tcc_define_symbol(s, "__DragonFly__", "__DragonFly__");
+# endif
#endif
/* TinyCC & gcc defines */
@@ -926,11 +929,12 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void)
# if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined (__FreeBSD_kernel__) \
|| defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
tcc_define_symbol(s, "__WINT_TYPE__", "int");
-# ifdef __FreeBSD__
+# if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__)
/* define __GNUC__ to
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
Are they with / without the fix ? Because normally the changes would address those I saw them too. On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 16:14, Christian Jullien wrote: > > Same result, also NetBSD still fails with: > > -bash-5.0$ ./configure > Binary directory/usr/local/bin > TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc > Library directory /usr/local/lib > Include directory /usr/local/include > Manual directory/usr/local/share/man > Info directory /usr/local/share/info > Doc directory /usr/local/share/doc > Source path /home/jullien/tinycc > C compiler gcc (7.4) > Target OS NetBSD > CPU x86_64 > Config ldl=no > Creating config.mak and config.h > config.h is unchanged > -bash-5.0$ gmake > gmake[1]: Entering directory '/home/jullien/tinycc/lib' > ../tcc -c bt-exe.c -o ../bt-exe.o -B.. -I.. > In file included from bt-exe.c:6: > In file included from ../tccrun.c:21: > In file included from ../tcc.h:29: > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:37: > /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:441: error: #error "No function renaming possible" > gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:83: ../bt-exe.o] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jullien/tinycc/lib' > gmake: *** [Makefile:269: libtcc1.a] Error 2 > > > -Original Message- > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of Sudipto Mallick > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 16:50 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal > > Great achievement > > On OpenBSD x86_64, applied your patch and tried to compile, to get an > error that ucontext_t doesn't have uc_rbp as a member; i think that > was a typo and would be: sc_rbp. fixing that, it compiled smoothly > tried to compile a c file using this newly built tcc fails with crt0.o > etc. not found error :( > > ~smlckz > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
Hi,
here my first contribution, hope it is useful.
Kind regards.
From d4ad25cefb7c18975c853dc43390108228f95e68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:26:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix.
generates proper system constant.
errno uses TLS thus tccrun build breaks.
SYS_gettid is Linux specific, using pthread_self for simplicity.
---
lib/bcheck.c | 6 ++
libtcc.c | 3 +++
tcc.h| 8
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/bcheck.c b/lib/bcheck.c
index 06c5b60..5bbab47 100644
--- a/lib/bcheck.c
+++ b/lib/bcheck.c
@@ -220,9 +220,15 @@ typedef struct alloca_list_struct {
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE DWORD
#define BOUND_GET_TIDGetCurrentThreadId()
#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__riscv)
+#if defined(__linux__)
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE pid_t
#define BOUND_GET_TIDsyscall (SYS_gettid)
#else
+// Note: each platform has its own thread id api, pthread_self might suffice for starter
+#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int64_t
+#define BOUND_GET_TID(int64_t)(pthread_self())
+#endif
+#else
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int
#define BOUND_GET_TID0
#endif
diff --git a/libtcc.c b/libtcc.c
index 3698632..454b566 100644
--- a/libtcc.c
+++ b/libtcc.c
@@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void)
# if defined(__OpenBSD__)
tcc_define_symbol(s, "__OpenBSD__", "__OpenBSD__");
# endif
+# if defined(__DragonFly__)
+tcc_define_symbol(s, "__DragonFly__", "__DragonFly__");
+# endif
#endif
/* TinyCC & gcc defines */
diff --git a/tcc.h b/tcc.h
index 3c130ec..3c6ef2e 100644
--- a/tcc.h
+++ b/tcc.h
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
#define _DARWIN_C_SOURCE
#include "config.h"
+#ifdef __TINYC__
+// errno uses TLS unlike FreeBSD
+#define __thread
+#endif
+
#include
#include
#include
@@ -45,6 +50,9 @@
/* XXX: need to define this to use them in non ISOC99 context */
extern float strtof (const char *__nptr, char **__endptr);
extern long double strtold (const char *__nptr, char **__endptr);
+# ifdef __DragonFly__
+extern char **environ;
+# endif
#endif
#ifdef _WIN32
--
2.28.0
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
Ok I ve tried to test these changes under BSD systems, to make it
accepted by the system headers and all.
Kind regards.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 13:46, Christian Jullien wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be fine.
> I have direct access to FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD x64 machines this way I
> can check myself.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org]
> On Behalf Of David CARLIER
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 14:43
> To: jull...@eligis.com; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
>
> I just tried quickly FreeBSD, it fails for similar reasons than
> DragonFlyBSD minus the TLS one. I purposely focus only on DragonFlyBSD
> to make review easier do you prefer however an overall fix ?
>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 13:38, Christian Jullien wrote:
> >
> > It's really cool then, have you recently tried other BSD flavors: FreeBSD,
> > OpenBSD and NetBSD?
> > I made few attempts in the past.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tinycc-devel
> > [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of
> > David CARLIER
> > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 14:18
> > To: jull...@eligis.com; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
> >
> > It works I was able to compile few programs with, tests fail in same
> > way as on Linux (current mob branch).
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 12:59, Christian Jullien wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks but are sure it really works passing all the tests?
> > > Few years ago I tried different BSD versions and, for one reason or
> > > another, they all failed.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tinycc-devel
> > > [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of
> > > David CARLIER
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 13:53
> > > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > > Subject: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > here my first contribution, hope it is useful.
> > >
> > > Kind regards.
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Tinycc-devel mailing list
> > > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> >
> > ___
> > Tinycc-devel mailing list
> > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Tinycc-devel mailing list
> > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
>
> ___
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
From 8f08071e683fbdd915af88fcd7d583364450ea93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:26:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] BSD systems build fix.
generates proper DragonFlyBSD system constant.
errno uses TLS for DragonFlyBSD thus tccrun build breaks.
SYS_gettid is Linux specific, using pthread_self for simplicity.
---
lib/bcheck.c | 7 +++
libtcc.c | 6 +-
tcc.h| 11 +++
tccrun.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/bcheck.c b/lib/bcheck.c
index 06c5b60..df5d0c1 100644
--- a/lib/bcheck.c
+++ b/lib/bcheck.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#if !defined(__FreeBSD__) \
&& !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) \
@@ -220,9 +221,15 @@ typedef struct alloca_list_struct {
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE DWORD
#define BOUND_GET_TIDGetCurrentThreadId()
#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__riscv)
+#if defined(__linux__)
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE pid_t
#define BOUND_GET_TIDsyscall (SYS_gettid)
#else
+// Note: each platform has its own thread id api, pthread_self might suffice for starter
+#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int64_t
+#define BOUND_GET_TID(int64_t)(pthread_self())
+#endif
+#else
#define BOUND_TID_TYPE int
#define BOUND_GET_TID0
#endif
diff --git a/libtcc.c b/libtcc.c
index 3698632..f7e364f 100644
--- a/libtcc.c
+++ b/libtcc.c
@@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void)
# if defined(__OpenBSD__)
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
I just tried quickly FreeBSD, it fails for similar reasons than DragonFlyBSD minus the TLS one. I purposely focus only on DragonFlyBSD to make review easier do you prefer however an overall fix ? On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 13:38, Christian Jullien wrote: > > It's really cool then, have you recently tried other BSD flavors: FreeBSD, > OpenBSD and NetBSD? > I made few attempts in the past. > > -Original Message- > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of David CARLIER > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 14:18 > To: jull...@eligis.com; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal > > It works I was able to compile few programs with, tests fail in same > way as on Linux (current mob branch). > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 12:59, Christian Jullien wrote: > > > > Thanks but are sure it really works passing all the tests? > > Few years ago I tried different BSD versions and, for one reason or > > another, they all failed. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tinycc-devel > > [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of > > David CARLIER > > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 13:53 > > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > > Subject: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal > > > > Hi, > > > > here my first contribution, hope it is useful. > > > > Kind regards. > > > > > > ___ > > Tinycc-devel mailing list > > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
It works I was able to compile few programs with, tests fail in same way as on Linux (current mob branch). On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 12:59, Christian Jullien wrote: > > Thanks but are sure it really works passing all the tests? > Few years ago I tried different BSD versions and, for one reason or another, > they all failed. > > -Original Message- > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of David CARLIER > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 13:53 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal > > Hi, > > here my first contribution, hope it is useful. > > Kind regards. > > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD build fix proposal
Hi, here my first contribution, hope it is useful. Kind regards. 0001-DragonFlyBSD-build-fix.patch Description: Binary data ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
