Re: [Tinyos-help] why is s-mac not implemented for CC2420-based platforms in TOS2?
Hi Abhishek, you're right! It seems that a great deal of the work has already been done. I'll try to stick a little bit more on my implementation, because I need it anyway, but it doesn't seem to have a brigth future... Le 9 mai 08 à 04:11, abhishek chanani a écrit : Hi Erwing, Thanks for your reply. I am not sure how long I ll stick around with this project but do have a look at the paper "A Component-Based Architecture for Power-Efficient Media Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks" by Kevin Klues∗ , Gregory Hackmann, Octav Chipara, Chenyang Lu. I think they have already done a lot of the work. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Erwing R. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Le 8 mai 08 à 15:24, abhishek chanani a écrit : Hi Erwing, Just wanted to know whats your progress in implementing S-MAC on the telosb platform. I m doing some similar work and thought you might be able to help. Hi Abhishek, I'm still working on it. At first I wanted to port the code from tos1 on top of platform-specific modules in tos2. That'd allow the code to be used with any platform; however I realized that'll be a lot of work so now I'm just focusing only on telosb and its cc2420 stack. My idea is to re-use the tinyos2 stack as much as possible, and that means, basically, that I'm trying to insert the s-mac layer into the ActiveMessage stack (speciffically on top of CsmaC). This is just my approach, and I think it makes sense but I will be willing to discuss with you any other ideas. Erwing -- Regards, Abhishek Chanani Academic Affairs Secretary, 315-Mandakini Hostel Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Mobile: +919444005765 Phone: (044) 22578540 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
Re: [Tinyos-help] why is s-mac not implemented for CC2420-based platforms in TOS2?
Il giorno 14/apr/08, alle ore 16:46, Omprakash Gnawali ha scritto: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Erwing Sánchez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm starting a research project aiming to compare several mac >> implementations for telosb platforms in TinyOS 2.x. At the >> beginning I >> thought it was a good idea to start with simple protocols such as >> S-MAC, and therefore I will start implementing it on TinyOS 2.x. >> Nevertheless, it is strange to note that it hasn't been done yet!! >> Does anybody know why? I think there are not technical requirements >> that cannot be achieved with CC2420 radio module. I mean, probably >> there is a great trend going toward LowPower implementations and some >> of them seem to be unpractical in telosb platforms, but I think s-mac >> is not only feasible but also useful. >> I'd appreciate some comments and advice from the mailing list, >> thanks. > > S-MAC might be feasible and useful but it simply has not been > implemented in TinyOS 2.x. Are you interested in contributing the code > or know someone who might be interested? If it is a robust and > promising piece of code, we can include it in TinyOS. > > - om_p I just wanted to be sure that, actually, the code doesn't exist already. Now, I'm willing to give it a try and implementing it myself. I'll let you know how things go. Erwing ___ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
Re: [Tinyos-help] why is s-mac not implemented for CC2420-based platforms in TOS2?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Erwing Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I'm starting a research project aiming to compare several mac > implementations for telosb platforms in TinyOS 2.x. At the beginning I > thought it was a good idea to start with simple protocols such as > S-MAC, and therefore I will start implementing it on TinyOS 2.x. > Nevertheless, it is strange to note that it hasn't been done yet!! > Does anybody know why? I think there are not technical requirements > that cannot be achieved with CC2420 radio module. I mean, probably > there is a great trend going toward LowPower implementations and some > of them seem to be unpractical in telosb platforms, but I think s-mac > is not only feasible but also useful. > I'd appreciate some comments and advice from the mailing list, thanks. S-MAC might be feasible and useful but it simply has not been implemented in TinyOS 2.x. Are you interested in contributing the code or know someone who might be interested? If it is a robust and promising piece of code, we can include it in TinyOS. - om_p ___ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
