[tips] What is this thing called love?

2009-05-25 Thread sblack
Answer according to a recent but apparently still unpublished study:

Differences in major histocompatibility complex genes for the immune 
system. I can't wait for the song writers to get to work on that. 

http://tinyurl.com/oeyqy2

(Apparently a presentation today at the European Society of Human 
Genetics  by Prof. Maria da Graça Bicalho of the University of Parana, 
Brazil).

Stephen
-
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.  
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University  e-mail:  sbl...@ubishops.ca
2600 College St.
Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Subscribe to discussion list (TIPS) for the teaching of
psychology at http://flightline.highline.edu/sfrantz/tips/
---

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


[tips] Panicology

2009-05-25 Thread Mike Palij
Has anyone read the book "Panicology"?  The full title is:
Panicology: Two Statisticians Explain What's Worth Worrying 
About (and What's Not) in the 21st Century by Hugh 
Aldersey-Williams and Simon Briscoe 

I ask because there have been several articles recently either
reviewing or summarizing it.  For example, the NY Times personal
health columnist Jane Brody provided a brief overview last week;
see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/health/19brod.html?ref=science

This article served as the basis for a blog entry by Andrew Sullivan
at the Atlantic website: see:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/obsessing-about-risk-and-crashes.html
or
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e201157098a69c970b 

The book was also reviewed on the other side of the pond along with
another volume (Dan Gardner's "Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear");
see:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/mar/09/society

I haven't read the book yet but it seems like its focus is consistent with
some views expressed on TiPS in recent months.  On the basis of
these articles, it seems that if "ordinary people" people are given the
following choices:

(1)  irrational panic and fear about low probability events
(2)  being comforted by how much safer we are today relative to
historical standards

People will choose (1) unless they critically analyze the information
that they are presented by the media and others (can this be the operation
of the recognition heuristic in short-circuiting critical thinking?).

Folks may also want to read the following article on people's over reaction
to rare but dreaded risks:
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2007/05/securitymatters_0517

And here's a question to for class:

Which results in more emergency room visits?

(a)  unintentional gunshots
(b)  accidental suffocation
(c)  household pets
(d)  who can afford to go to the emergency room now?

For the answer, see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/health/19stat.html?bl&ex=1243396800&en=7d373a985532733a&ei=5087%0A
and/or
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5811a1.htm


-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu





---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


re: [tips] What is this thing called love?

2009-05-25 Thread Mike Palij
On Mon, 25 May 2009 06:06:54 -0700, Stephen Black wrote:
>Answer according to a recent but apparently still unpublished study:
>
>Differences in major histocompatibility complex genes for the immune 
>system. I can't wait for the song writers to get to work on that. 
>
>http://tinyurl.com/oeyqy2
>
>(Apparently a presentation today at the European Society of Human 
>Genetics  by Prof. Maria da Graça Bicalho of the University of Parana, 
>Brazil).

Question:  since the comparison was between married couples and
"152 couples chosen at random from the population and who were 
neither married nor having sexual relations with one another", how
do we know that it isn't something about being married that altered
the genes of married people?  According to some people, marriage
changes everything. :-)

A prospective experimental study should be done.  And if scents
or pheromes are the basis for the "attraction", then people should
base "desirability as a mate" judgments solely on appropriately
presented scent samples that are either genetically similar or different
to the participant.  

I can see it now:

Experimenter:  here, sniff this cloth.

Participant: okay *sniff, sniff*

Experimenter:  On a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 means "I would never
want to meet this person" and "10 means I would like to spend the rest
of my life with this person", how would you rate the person this smell came
from?

Participant:  You're kidding me, right?

Anybody know someone who needs a thesis topic?

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


Re: [tips] Panicology

2009-05-25 Thread Christopher Green

Mike Palij wrote:

Has anyone read the book "Panicology"?  The full title is:
Panicology: Two Statisticians Explain What's Worth Worrying 
About (and What's Not) in the 21st Century by Hugh 
Aldersey-Williams and Simon Briscoe 
  

I have not. But I think I will.

The book was also reviewed on the other side of the pond along with
another volume (Dan Gardner's "Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear");
see:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/mar/09/society

  
I have just finished this book (though with a different subtitle). 
Gardner is an Ottawa-based journalist, though the book seems to have 
been the outcome of a number of discussion he had with psychologists 
Paul Slovic.


I thoroughly recommend the book, though do not expect it to satisfy your 
most elevated scientific sensibilities. Gardner simplifies much, and 
converts a lot of Tversky-&-Kahneman technical vocabulary  into terms 
that are more easily digestible by non-scientists (a rather crude but 
serviceable dichotomy between "head" and "gut" runs throughout the 
book). Still, for the general public (or even undergraduates), what they 
can learn from this book might just undo some of the junk panic promoted 
by everyone from gov't to advertisers to activists, etc. The chapter 
near the end on "terrorism" is a pretty thorough debunking of most  
everything that has gone on in the name of "security" in the past eight 
years.


Chris
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3

chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
Office: 416-736-2100 ext. 66164
Fax: 416-736-5814
=

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


re: [tips] What is this thing called love?

2009-05-25 Thread Jim Clark
Hi

Mike's hypothetical study is not too far from prior research on
attractiveness of odors collected at different points in the menstrual
cycle (and of faces as noted in the article).  Just need to add the
genetic component to the equation.

http://www.livescience.com/health/060118_armpit_odor.html 

Take care
Jim

James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
 
Department of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3B 2E9
CANADA


>>> "Mike Palij"  25-May-09 8:41 AM >>>
On Mon, 25 May 2009 06:06:54 -0700, Stephen Black wrote:
>Answer according to a recent but apparently still unpublished study:
>
>Differences in major histocompatibility complex genes for the immune 
>system. I can't wait for the song writers to get to work on that. 
>
>http://tinyurl.com/oeyqy2 
>
>(Apparently a presentation today at the European Society of Human 
>Genetics  by Prof. Maria da Graša Bicalho of the University of Parana,

>Brazil).

Question:  since the comparison was between married couples and
"152 couples chosen at random from the population and who were 
neither married nor having sexual relations with one another", how
do we know that it isn't something about being married that altered
the genes of married people?  According to some people, marriage
changes everything. :-)

A prospective experimental study should be done.  And if scents
or pheromes are the basis for the "attraction", then people should
base "desirability as a mate" judgments solely on appropriately
presented scent samples that are either genetically similar or
different
to the participant.  

I can see it now:

Experimenter:  here, sniff this cloth.

Participant: okay *sniff, sniff*

Experimenter:  On a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 means "I would never
want to meet this person" and "10 means I would like to spend the rest
of my life with this person", how would you rate the person this smell
came
from?

Participant:  You're kidding me, right?

Anybody know someone who needs a thesis topic?

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu 




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


re: [tips] What is this thing called love?

2009-05-25 Thread Mike Palij
On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:31:36 -0700, Jim Clark wrote:
>Hi
>
>Mike's hypothetical study is not too far from prior research on
>attractiveness of odors collected at different points in the menstrual
>cycle (and of faces as noted in the article).  Just need to add the
>genetic component to the equation.
>
> http://www.livescience.com/health/060118_armpit_odor.html  

On the same website above, there is an article that reports a study
very similar to what I had suggested. Quoting from it:

|Stinky T-shirts
|
|In 1996, Claus Wedekind, a zoologist at Bern University in Switzerland, 
|conducted what's become known as the stinky T-shirt study. 
|Wedekind had 44 men each wear a t-shirt for two nights straight, 
|then tested how women reacted to the smelly shirts.
|
|Like mice, women preferred the scent of men whose immune systems 
|were unlike their own. If a man's immune system was similar, a woman 
|tended to describe his T-shirt as smelling like her father or brother.
|
|Since then, companies have developed pheremone-based perfumes 
|and cologns, with promises of increased sexual attraction. Researchers 
|don't agree on their effectiveness. 
|
|More research is needed to figure out how and to what extent a woman's 
|nose leads her to sex, and how adept she is at picking a healthy partner.
|
|"We cannot rule out that other parts of the human nose are able to detect 
|the peptides," Frank Zufall said. "We can now ask whether these peptides 
|are present in human secretions such as sweat and saliva, whether they 
|can be detected by the human nose, and if so, whether they have any 
|influence on our own social behavior." 
http://www.livescience.com/health/041104_sex_and_smell.html

How freaky would it be to be out on a date and being told:
"Funny, you smell like my father."

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu


 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


[tips] the science news cycle

2009-05-25 Thread Sally Walters

science news and where it goes :-)

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/22/the-science-news-cycle/

Sally Walters
Capilano University



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


[tips] Archives of Psychology

2009-05-25 Thread Jim Matiya

If you go to 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ahap65/3253503185/

 

you'll find thosands of pictures from the Archives of the History of American 
Psychology


Fascinating!

 

 

Jim


Jim Matiya 
Florida Gulf Coast University
jmat...@fgcu.edu
Contributor, for Karen Huffman's Psychology in Action, Video Guest Lecturettes 
John Wiley and Sons.
 
Using David Myers' texts for AP Psychology? Go to  
http://bcs.worthpublishers.com/cppsych/
High School Psychology and Advanced Psychology Graphic Organizers, 
Pacing Guides, and Daily Lesson Plans archived at www.Teaching-Point.net


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

Re: [tips] Archives of Psychology

2009-05-25 Thread Christopher D. Green
Jim Matiya wrote:
>
> If you go to
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ahap65/3253503185/
> you'll find thosands of pictures from the Archives of the History of 
> American Psychology
> Fascinating!

There is also an AHAP channel on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/AHAP65

Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

[tips] Texting May Be Taking a Toll on Teenagers - NYTimes.com

2009-05-25 Thread Christopher D. Green
Generally speaking, I am skeptical of the popular 
computers-are-killing-our-children genre of news report. However, 
"American teenagers sent and received an average of *2, 272 text 
messages per month* in the fourth quarter of 2008"!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/health/26teen.html?hpw

Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)