Dear Tipsters,

as always, I am amazed by the speed and accuracy of responses on this list; 
thank you so much, Stephen and Mike!
 
I hope the quotation will drive home a point with a subpopulation of our
students who 
continue to worry about assumptions of ANOVA while simultaneously endorsing
ad-hoc 4-point rating scales as dependent variables <sigh>. 

Regards,
Rainer

Dr. Rainer Scheuchenpflug
Lehrstuhl für Psychologie III
Röntgenring 11
97070 Würzburg
Tel:   0931-312185
Fax:   0931-312616
Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
<quote of original messages> 
Subject: Re: Citation for usefulness of pretests for ANOVA
From: "Stephen Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:17:54 -0400

<my question deleted>
I love it when I can answer questions like this. It was George Box who
provided that delightful simile. 
They just don't write about statistics like that any more, do they?  The
reference is:

Box, G.E.P. (1953). Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika 40:
318-35. 

I searched my files but couldn't come up with a copy of the paper. But I
found something on- line nearly as 
good: a "Citation Classic" reminiscence by Box about the circumstances in
which this paper came to be. (A 
"Citation Classic" is an essay which the authors of highly- cited works are
asked to provide].

Box gives the famous quotation there as "To make the preliminary test on
variances is rather like putting to sea in a rowing boat to find out whether
conditions are sufficiently calm for an ocean liner to leave port". That's
remarkably close to what Rainer remembered. 
Pretty good!

The Citation Classic of Box is in _Current Contents_, no. 4 January 25, 1982
and is available on-line at: 
http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1982/A1982MX29400001.pdf

Note to editors: the essay concludes with a wonderful anecdote. Box says the
referee at Biometrika harshly rejected his paper. But the envelope included
a hand-written note from E.S. Pearson, which said "You will see that the
referee does not like your paper but I do and subject to mild revision I am
going to publish it anyway". Box concludes by noting that papers with novel
ideas are the hardest to publish. 

Stephen

______________________________
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.       
Department of Psychology        
Bishop's  University          
Lennoxville, QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dept web page: www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy TIPS discussion list for
psychology teachers at:
 faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm    
______________________________________

Subject: Re: Citation for usefulness of pretests for ANOVA
From: "Mike Palij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:12:28 -0400

<snip>
For those of you with Jstor.org access, the article is avaiable at:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0006-3444%28195312%2940%3A3%2F4%3C318%3ANAT
OV%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J
or
http://tinyurl.com/zetto


-Mike Palij
New York University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<end quote>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------


---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to