Re: What is guessing?

2000-11-07 Thread Drnanjo
In a message dated 11/6/2000 7:59:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


For example, there are a
number of strategies that examinees can use to get better than chance
performance even when they have no knowlege of the tested material -- for
example, always choosing the longest answer option (Kalat showed that this
strategy works well with the poorly constructed items in typical intro psych
test banks -- I always take care to avoid writing MC questions where this
strategy would pay off)


My last word, because I know that most people aren't interested and are possibly annoyed. This is all speculative despite any one listmember's belief that they have some kind of uncontestable scientific support for their opinion on this matter. 

Students may "know" that they should (when in doubt)

- always select the longest/shortest answer
- always select "C"
- never select answers containing the word "always"

but the reality is that not all will employ these strategies consistently. I have watched students who spent months practicing suddenly "forget" everything they have learned due to their own anxiety and begin answering thoughtlessly and impulsively. And I have witnessed students surveying a tough analogy item with stem pair words that they have never seen or don't recognize and five words the meanings of which they do not know. There is such a thing as "blind" or "bad" guessing.

I am not saying that all students should be coached to skip items. That was never my point. But, in my experience, some students are better off skipping items, sometimes. 

Nancy Melucci


Night blindness

2000-11-07 Thread Stephen Black

As a bit of Canadian content, a team of researchers at the
University of Calgary apparently just announced that they've
discovered a gene for it. A news item on it appeared in Canadian
newspapers on October 31, 2000.

See http://www.canoe.ca/Health0010/31_blindness-cp.html

I say "apparently" because if you go the University of Calgary
website ( http://www.rpresearch.ca/vw1f-81.htm), it turns out the
news dates back to an article in Nature Genetics in 1998.

But it seems that this news refers to a follow-up study in the
same journal. Here's the abstract.

-Stephen

Nat Genet 2000 Nov;26(3):319-323 

Mutations in NYX, encoding the leucine-rich proteoglycan
nyctalopin, cause X-linked complete congenital stationary night
blindness.

Bech-Hansen NT, Naylor MJ, Maybaum TA, Sparkes RL, Koop B, Birch
DG, Bergen AA, Prinsen CF, Polomeno RC, Gal A, Drack AV,
Musarella MA, Jacobson SG, Young RS, Weleber RG

Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University
of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

During development, visual photoreceptors, bipolar cells and
other neurons establish connections within the retina enabling
the eye to process visual images over approximately 7 log units
of illumination. Within the retina, cells that respond to light
increment and light decrement are separated into ON- and
OFF-pathways. Hereditary diseases are known to disturb these
retinal pathways, causing either progressive degeneration or
stationary deficits. Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB)
is a group of stable retinal disorders that are characterized by
abnormal night vision. Genetic subtypes of CSNB have been defined
and different disease actions have been postulated. The molecular
bases have been elucidated in several subtypes, providing a
better understanding of the disease mechanisms and developmental
retinal neurobiology. Here we have studied 22 families with
'complete' X-linked CSNB (CSNB1; MIM 310500; ref. 4) in which
affected males have night blindness, some photopic vision loss
and a defect of the ON-pathway. We have found 14 different
mutations, including 1 founder mutation in 7 families from the
United States, in a novel candidate gene, NYX. NYX, which encodes
a glycosylphosphatidyl (GPI)-anchored protein called nyctalopin,
is a new and unique member of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan
(SLRP) family. The role of other SLRP proteins suggests that
mutant nyctalopin disrupts developing retinal interconnections
involving the ON-bipolar cells, leading to the visual losses seen
in patients with complete CSNB.



Stephen Black, Ph.D.  tel: (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
Department of Psychology  fax: (819) 822-9661
Bishop's Universitye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC   
J1M 1Z7  
Canada Department web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
   Check out TIPS listserv for teachers of psychology at:
   http://www.frostburg.edu/dept/psyc/southerly/tips/





Re: Guessing on the GRE: the grand synthesis

2000-11-07 Thread G. Marc Turner

At 12:20 AM 11/7/2000 -0500, Stephen Black wrote:
Concerning my objection to Marc Turner's post on being a "good
guesser" on the grounds that there's no such thing, I see now

I admit it... bad choice of phrasing on my part with that one.

than what would be expected on average. I suggest "lucky guesser"
is a less confusing term for what he had in mind. And, contrary

True... I thought about this later on as well... lucky and unlucky instead
of good and lousy...

So the advice to a student would be: If you have no basis
whatsoever for deciding among the five alternatives, guess if
you're a gamblin' man (or woman), or don't guess if you're a
cautious sort. But only the very poorest of students answering

Agreed... and my sole point of joining this discussion was to argue that
true random guessing could hurt someone's score. I think this was Nancy's
main point as well. Actually, I don't think any of us were ever that far
apart, but there might have been some miscommunications along the way...
(for example, my "good" guessers)

Hope all is well...
- Marc

(And unless something else that I strongly disagree with shows up, I'm back
to work on the dissertation... the fun never ends... how could it end? It
never started!)
G. Marc Turner, MEd
Lecturer  Head of Computer Operations
Department of Psychology
Southwest Texas State University
San Marcos, TX  78666
phone: (512)245-2526
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



No Subject

2000-11-07 Thread Deborah Briihl

The results are in - and the answer is - there really doesn't seem to be 
much out there! The two that someone gave me here are "Descriptive Tests of 
Language Skills in Critical Reasoning" (1989, ETS - a multiple choice test) 
and "The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test" (an essay test based on 
response to a letter to the editor). The other responses are listed below.


Deb -
How about John Newman's Scale of Adult Intellectual Development? 60 items,
giving scores on Absolutism, Relativism, and Evaluativism? If you're
interested, I can send copies of the materials that he sent me, including
definitions of the constructs and reports on reliability.

Paul Smith
Alverno College




Jeff Ricker asked about good measures of critical thinking. The
University of East Anglia's the Centre for Research in Critical
Thinking has published a book by Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven
called 'Critical Thinking: Its Definition and Assessment'. This may be
of assistance. Details can be found at:
http://www.uea.ac.uk/soc/phil/research/critbook.shtml.

The homepage for the Centre for Research in Critical Thinking is at:
http://www.uea.ac.uk/soc/phil/research/critphil.shtml.

Wayne Spencer
Deb

Dr. Deborah S. Briihl
Dept. of Psychology and Counseling
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
(229) 333-5994
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well I know these voices must be my soul...
Rhyme and Reason - DMB




Graduate admissions: Honors versus major?

2000-11-07 Thread Leo Standing

Greetings:

In Canada, an honors psychology BA or BSc degree is usually seen as 
essential to entering almost any graduate program in psychology. (Our 
honors degree requires a dissertation and various courses that are 
not needed for the major, as well as a specified average grade).

Can our friends in the USA enlighten us as to whether reputable 
graduate schools there will accept applicants who hold only the BA 
major (not honors) in psychology? Some of our graduating students are 
concerned about this, and I'd like to be able to help them. (Please 
post your comments to the list).

Thanks,

Leo Standing


---

Leo Standing, PhD   Phone: 819-822-9600, ex.2456
Chair, Psychology Dept.   
Bishop's University, 
Lennoxville, QC  Fax:   819-822-9661
Canada J1M 1Z7   Home:  819-346-1897
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy




making the BA distinctive

2000-11-07 Thread Steven Davis

At North Central College, we offer both the BA and BS in psychology.
The main difference is that the BS requires more courses in science and
math.  We are interested in doing something to make the BA more
distinctive, rather than being just the easier option (e.g., requiring a
philosophy of science course, other coursework in the social sciences,
language requirement, etc.).  I was wondering if anyone out there works
at a place where the BA has such requirements that make it distinctive
(again, rather than just easier), and if so, what are the requirements?

Thanks,
Steve

--
**
* Steven M. Davis, Ph.D. *
* Assistant Professor of Psychology  *
* North Central College  *
* 30 N. Brainard St. *
* Naperville, IL 60566-7063  *
**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]630/637-5327 (office) 630/637-5121 (fax) *
**
http://www.noctrl.edu/academics/departments/psychology/department_site/psychome.htm




begin:vcard 
n:davis;steve
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-15984
fn:Steve Davis
end:vcard



Re: Graduate admissions: Honors versus major?

2000-11-07 Thread Esther Yoder Strahan

Leo and Tipsters,

I know that many USA grad programs do not require an honors degree. Many of 
our students here at Heidelberg have gotten into grad school (in the US) 
without being honors students.

My own experience bears this out, as well. I was admitted to the clinical 
psychology Ph.D. program at Purdue University without and honors degree and 
without so much as an undergrad psychology major. I actually had an English 
B.A. and a Nursing B.S. (but I had killer GREs).

I have no empirical evidence to share beyond these anecdotes.

Esther



At 01:47 PM 11/7/00 -0500, Leo Standing wrote:
Greetings:

In Canada, an honors psychology BA or BSc degree is usually seen as
essential to entering almost any graduate program in psychology. (Our
honors degree requires a dissertation and various courses that are
not needed for the major, as well as a specified average grade).

Can our friends in the USA enlighten us as to whether reputable
graduate schools there will accept applicants who hold only the BA
major (not honors) in psychology? Some of our graduating students are
concerned about this, and I'd like to be able to help them. (Please
post your comments to the list).

Thanks,

Leo Standing


---

Leo Standing, PhD   Phone: 819-822-9600, ex.2456
Chair, Psychology Dept.
Bishop's University,
Lennoxville, QC  Fax:   819-822-9661
Canada J1M 1Z7   Home:  819-346-1897
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy

Esther Strahan, Ph.D
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Heidelberg College
310 E. Market St.
Tiffin, Ohio 44883
Tel. (419) 448-2238
Fax (419) 448-2236




RE: Graduate admissions: Honors versus major?

2000-11-07 Thread Nathalie Cote

Leo, I earned my degree at Vanderbilt in the Psychology and Human
Development program. They didn't even require graduate students to have an
undergrad degree in psychology. My peers in the PhD program were coming from
a variety of undergrad backgrounds, including physics and religion, although
most of them did have either a BA or BS in psychology. More important were
grades, GRE scores, research experience, and in particular the personal
essay. Faculty often advocated for a particular applicant when on the basis
of the essay and perhaps a phone call or interview it appeared that the
prospective student was interested in that faculty member's research. Let me
know if you'd like more details.
Nathalie Cote

*
Nathalie Coté
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Belmont Abbey College
100 Belmont - Mt. Holly Road
Belmont, NC  28012
(704) 825-6754
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Leo Standing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 1:47 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Graduate admissions: Honors versus major?
 
 
 Greetings:
 
 In Canada, an honors psychology BA or BSc degree is usually seen as 
 essential to entering almost any graduate program in psychology. (Our 
 honors degree requires a dissertation and various courses that are 
 not needed for the major, as well as a specified average grade).
 
 Can our friends in the USA enlighten us as to whether reputable 
 graduate schools there will accept applicants who hold only the BA 
 major (not honors) in psychology? Some of our graduating students are 
 concerned about this, and I'd like to be able to help them. (Please 
 post your comments to the list).
 
 Thanks,
 
 Leo Standing
 
 
 ---
 
 Leo Standing, PhD   Phone: 819-822-9600, ex.2456
 Chair, Psychology Dept.   
 Bishop's University, 
 Lennoxville, QC  Fax:   819-822-9661
 Canada J1M 1Z7   Home:  819-346-1897
 http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
 



Simulating data

2000-11-07 Thread Nathalie Cote

Suppose you were in a Methods or Statistics class in which you had to design
a study, create the materials, collect some of the data, and then use the
data from this partial sample to simulate or fill in fictitious data for the
rest of the sample. 

Let's say, for example, that you've collected scores on self-esteem and body
image instruments from 10 college men and 10 college women, and you want to
use those data as the basis for generating fake data for 40 more women and
40 more men. The data will then be analyzed for correlations between the
measures and differences between men and women on each measure and on the
correlations. 

One thread, of course, might be to discuss why anyone would want to do this.
Let's assume for the moment that it's done for good reasons. What I am
interested in is, how would you go about simulating the data? 

*
Nathalie Coté
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Belmont Abbey College
100 Belmont - Mt. Holly Road
Belmont, NC  28012
(704) 825-6754
 



another student question

2000-11-07 Thread Salvatore Cullari

Hi everyone. Does anyone have any leads or suggestions for this 
question? Why do we sleep with our eyes closed?  In other words, 
aside from the obvious, what biological factors are responsible for 
sleeping with our eyes closed.  Thanks!

Salvatore Cullari, Ph.D.E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor  Chair, Psychology DepartmentVoice: 717-867-6197
Lebanon Valley College  Fax: 717-867-6075
Annville, Pa. 17003 Moderator, Psy-PA
Department's Homepage: http://www.lvc.edu/www/psychology/index.html
Personal Web site:  http://www.nvo.com/scullari/door



Re: Simulating data

2000-11-07 Thread jim clark

Hi

Sorry for this going out with the "mailing list" subject
header.  An oversight on my part.

On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Nathalie Cote wrote:
 Suppose you were in a Methods or Statistics class in which you had to design
 a study, create the materials, collect some of the data, and then use the
 data from this partial sample to simulate or fill in fictitious data for the
 rest of the sample. 
 
 Let's say, for example, that you've collected scores on self-esteem and body
 image instruments from 10 college men and 10 college women, and you want to
 use those data as the basis for generating fake data for 40 more women and
 40 more men. The data will then be analyzed for correlations between the
 measures and differences between men and women on each measure and on the
 correlations. 

I do two variations of this for my honours methods and stats
class.  

(1) They work on individualized assignments that are computer
generated.  I use SPSS algorithms for generating samples from
known populations (e.g., specified mu, sigma, rho, ...) and they
include their students numbers as part of the SET SEED= value.  
SEED determines the actual data.  So you could use the 10
observations to "estimate" mu, sigma, and rho, and then plug
those values into the SPSS routines.  When I get into more
complex situations (e.g., multiple regression, factorial
anovas) there is some "trial and error" work in getting realistic
data.

(2)  We also do a class project each term, where we design a
study, develop measures, etc.  Ideally we then run a study with
100 or more real subjects.  I give them algorithms to sample a
specified number of observations out of the entire data set for
their personal analyses and writeups.  Occasionally there has not
been enough time to collect full data so we end up with just data
for the class (30-40 students).  In those cases, I have
"replicated" data set.  That is, simply add the set of
observations to itself a specified number of times, and then
sample from this expanded set.  Ten might be a little low to do
this approach on, depending on what you want the final n to be.

Best wishes
Jim


James M. Clark  (204) 786-9757
Department of Psychology(204) 774-4134 Fax
University of Winnipeg  4L05D
Winnipeg, Manitoba  R3B 2E9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CANADA  http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark





RE: Simulating data

2000-11-07 Thread Wuensch, Karl L.

Here is an example of how do simulate data for a simple bivariate linear
model using SAS.  I use this macro to generate a different random sample for
each student in the class, with data posted on the web for them and with
solutions to me.  If you want a less hands-on approach, I recommend Drake
Bradley's DATASIM software.

TITLE1 'Simulation from Wuensch, Castellow,  Moore, JSBP, 1991.'; %MACRO
MREG; DATA SOL; drop subject; 
DO subject = 1 TO 100; 
serious=round(5.5+1.6*NORMAL(0)); 
if serious  9 then serious = 9;if serious  1 then serious = 1; 
sentence = round(-.92+1.16*serious+2.78*NORMAL(0)); 
if sentence  1 then sentence = 1;if sentence  15 then sentence = 15;
OUTPUT;FILE "C:\SimData\%name.dat";PUT sentence serious; end;
TITLE3 "Analysis of Regression Data Given to %ST";   
PROC REG simple corr; MODEL sentence = serious; 
%MEND MREG; 

+
Karl L. Wuensch, Department of Psychology,
East Carolina University, Greenville NC  27858-4353
Voice:  252-328-4102 Fax:  252-328-6283
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm
http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/klw.htm 




Re: Simulating data

2000-11-07 Thread Kenneth M. Steele


Natalie:

There is a technique called "boostraping" for resampling from 
your data set to get a more stable estimate of values.  You may 
want to check your local stat package to see if that is 
available.

For class assignments I use "lo-tech" techniques like Jim and 
create pseudosubject scores by jittering the data with calls to 
a random number generator such that the mean jitter effect is 0 
and the range is some reasonable value, depending on the 
question.

Treatment effects may be simulated by adding a jitterized 
constant.

Ken



On Tue, 07 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500 Nathalie Cote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Suppose you were in a Methods or Statistics class in which you had to design
 a study, create the materials, collect some of the data, and then use the
 data from this partial sample to simulate or fill in fictitious data for the
 rest of the sample. 
 
 Let's say, for example, that you've collected scores on self-esteem and body
 image instruments from 10 college men and 10 college women, and you want to
 use those data as the basis for generating fake data for 40 more women and
 40 more men. The data will then be analyzed for correlations between the
 measures and differences between men and women on each measure and on the
 correlations. 
 
 One thread, of course, might be to discuss why anyone would want to do this.
 Let's assume for the moment that it's done for good reasons. What I am
 interested in is, how would you go about simulating the data? 

--
Kenneth M. Steele[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Psychology
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA 






Re: Simulating data/spelling correction

2000-11-07 Thread Kenneth M. Steele


On Tue, 07 Nov 2000 17:21:11 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) 
"Kenneth M. Steele" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  There is a technique called "boostraping" for resampling from 
 

 That is "bootstrap" (as in lift yourself up by your own ...)
 
 Ken
 
 --
 Kenneth M. Steele[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: another student question

2000-11-07 Thread Ron Blue

light destroys melatonin.
Ron Blue

- Original Message -
From: "Salvatore Cullari" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:33 PM
Subject: another student question


 Hi everyone. Does anyone have any leads or suggestions for this
 question? Why do we sleep with our eyes closed?  In other words,
 aside from the obvious, what biological factors are responsible for
 sleeping with our eyes closed.  Thanks!

 Salvatore Cullari, Ph.D.E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Professor  Chair, Psychology DepartmentVoice: 717-867-6197
 Lebanon Valley College  Fax: 717-867-6075
 Annville, Pa. 17003 Moderator, Psy-PA
 Department's Homepage: http://www.lvc.edu/www/psychology/index.html
 Personal Web site:  http://www.nvo.com/scullari/door







Simulated Data

2000-11-07 Thread jim clark

Hi

If anyone would like to have a closer look at the techniques I
use to generate sample data for class exercises, I have started a
collection at www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark/sim.  Comments would be
appreciated.  I have quite a few of these from over the years and
will slowly pick away at posting them there (especially if there
is much interest in this idea).

Best wishes
Jim


James M. Clark  (204) 786-9757
Department of Psychology(204) 774-4134 Fax
University of Winnipeg  4L05D
Winnipeg, Manitoba  R3B 2E9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CANADA  http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark





National Social Studies Convention

2000-11-07 Thread Steve Rambach

Would anyone want to share a room at the National Social Studies Convention
in San Antonio.  I have booked a room across from the Alamo.
Steve

Steve Rambach
Lanphier High School
1300 N 11th Street
62702