Re: [tips] Silly season for psychic psychology?
Hi Personally, I believe that Stephen's posting is quite appropriate given the subject matter. But putting my naturalistic biases aside, I would assume that even believers in a supernatural realm would have some issue with claims that certain people are able to communicate with the deceased (or whatever immaterial elements are left of them). Indeed one of the ironies, perhaps, of claiming such an ability is that it brings the whole area of the "beyond" under scientific purview, whereas large numbers of believers appear to prefer that the two domains remain separate (i.e., Gould's separate magisteria). I guess one concern could be that discrediting claims of scientific contact with the supernatural plane might only serve to undermine further people's beliefs. Take care Jim James M. Clark Professor of Psychology 204-786-9757 204-774-4134 Fax j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca >>> Michael Smith 11-Jan-11 9:49:02 PM >>> In reading your post, it seems as though your posting is riddled with sarcasm, ridicule, and a-priori assumption. When reading it, a scientific attitude is not what comes to mind. --Mike --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=7848 or send a blank email to leave-7848-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7850 or send a blank email to leave-7850-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism
Hi Absolutely agreed ... it was ironic that the CBC program had first aired a member of an anti-vaccine group (she is in Winnipeg where I live) before Mnookin. But it did give him a chance to point out her (and other's) errors. And he clearly made the point that mentioning a few pro and con advocates grossly misrepresents reality when there are relatively few on one side and a vast number on the other. Mnookin himself is a journalist (contributing editor to Vanity Fair), apparently with a degree in history and science from Harvard, according to his website at http://sethmnookin.com/bio/ Mnookin also described the problem of under-vaccination that many attribute in part to the vaccine-autism myth. A little googling revealed serious problems in a number of locales with the percentage vaccinated falling below the critical level to protect the collective (i.e., reduced herd immunity). Take care Jim James M. Clark Professor of Psychology 204-786-9757 204-774-4134 Fax j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca >>> 11-Jan-11 7:41:00 PM >>> On 11 Jan 2011 at 15:52, Jim Clark wrote: > The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with Seth > Mnookin, who has a book out on > the vaccine - autism controversy. In the part I heard, he gave a very > reasonable response on some of the > claims made and harm done by the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at: > http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2011/01/11/panic-virus---seth-mnookin/ > > Some of his final points included the false impression given by so-called > "balanced reporting" on > controversial issues, and the importance of having reporters who understand > science. It's ironic that it's the CBC which brings us an interview in which the point is made that "balanced reporting" is not always a good (or responsible) idea. I distinctly recall that when the CBC recently reported on the breaking news of the Wakefield fraud, they first let us hear from autism experts opposed to the theory that vaccines cause autism. Then they turned for a sound bite from another sort of expert, a naturopath (a naturopath!!!), who predictably claimed that there were still lots of reasons to fear vaccination. Now that's balanced reporting. The problem, it seems to me, is that it's difficult for reporters and the general public to distinguish between true experts and those who falsely claim to be. So reporters present both sides, believing them to be equally valid, and the public accepts them the same way. Wakefield would be a particularly difficult case. Here we have an apparently respected medical doctor, at a respected hospital, with a research paper on a seemingly plausible hypothesis published in one of the most respected of medical journals. Long before the current fraud revelations, the untrustworthiness of his claim was well known in the scientific community, due to the weakness of his paper, its lack of evidence, and the existence of substantial contrary evidence. We knew the claim that vaccination causes autism is junk science. But how could reporters and the public know that? So the two sides are given equal time and receive equal respect. Siimilarly, when naturopaths and chiropractors tell us that fluoridation of drinking water is poisoning us, when psychoanalysts tell us that it's our parents who messed us up, or when gender feminists assert that Einstein stole credit for the theory of relativity from his wife, reporters report and people listen. Because they perceive those proponents of nutty theories to be experts too. Stephen Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, Emeritus Bishop's University Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada e-mail: sblack at ubishops.ca - --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=7845 or send a blank email to leave-7845-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7849 or send a blank email to leave-7849-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Silly season for psychic psychology?
In reading your post, it seems as though your posting is riddled with sarcasm, ridicule, and a-priori assumption. When reading it, a scientific attitude is not what comes to mind. --Mike --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7848 or send a blank email to leave-7848-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism
On 11 Jan 2011 at 15:52, Jim Clark wrote: > The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with Seth > Mnookin, who has a book out on > the vaccine - autism controversy. In the part I heard, he gave a very > reasonable response on some of the > claims made and harm done by the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at: > http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2011/01/11/panic-virus---seth-mnookin/ > > Some of his final points included the false impression given by so-called > "balanced reporting" on > controversial issues, and the importance of having reporters who understand > science. It's ironic that it's the CBC which brings us an interview in which the point is made that "balanced reporting" is not always a good (or responsible) idea. I distinctly recall that when the CBC recently reported on the breaking news of the Wakefield fraud, they first let us hear from autism experts opposed to the theory that vaccines cause autism. Then they turned for a sound bite from another sort of expert, a naturopath (a naturopath!!!), who predictably claimed that there were still lots of reasons to fear vaccination. Now that's balanced reporting. The problem, it seems to me, is that it's difficult for reporters and the general public to distinguish between true experts and those who falsely claim to be. So reporters present both sides, believing them to be equally valid, and the public accepts them the same way. Wakefield would be a particularly difficult case. Here we have an apparently respected medical doctor, at a respected hospital, with a research paper on a seemingly plausible hypothesis published in one of the most respected of medical journals. Long before the current fraud revelations, the untrustworthiness of his claim was well known in the scientific community, due to the weakness of his paper, its lack of evidence, and the existence of substantial contrary evidence. We knew the claim that vaccination causes autism is junk science. But how could reporters and the public know that? So the two sides are given equal time and receive equal respect. Siimilarly, when naturopaths and chiropractors tell us that fluoridation of drinking water is poisoning us, when psychoanalysts tell us that it's our parents who messed us up, or when gender feminists assert that Einstein stole credit for the theory of relativity from his wife, reporters report and people listen. Because they perceive those proponents of nutty theories to be experts too. Stephen Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, Emeritus Bishop's University Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada e-mail: sblack at ubishops.ca - --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7845 or send a blank email to leave-7845-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism
Hi Jim- This sounds like a good resource. Thanks for passing it along. Unfortunately, the Jenny McCarthy's of this world don't give up their beliefs that easily. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jenny-mccarthy/vaccine-autism-debate_b_806857.html "Post hoc ergo propter hoc" seems to be all of the logic that some people need. -Don. - Original Message - From: Jim Clark Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:52 pm Subject: [tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" > Hi > > The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio > interview with Seth Mnookin, who has a book out on the vaccine - > autism controversy. In the part I heard, he gave a very > reasonable response on some of the claims made and harm done by > the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at: > > http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2011/01/11/panic-virus--- > seth-mnookin/ > > Some of his final points included the false impression given by > so-called "balanced reporting" on controversial issues, and the > importance of having reporters who understand science. I > haven't read his book, but it sounds like it might be useful on > this issue. > > Take care > Jim > > > James M. Clark > Professor of Psychology > 204-786-9757 > 204-774-4134 Fax > j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: dap...@shaw.ca. > To unsubscribe click here: > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98f18&n=T&l=tips&o=7841or > send a blank email to > leave-7841-13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98...@fsulist.frostburg.edu > Don Allen Retired professor Langara College --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7843 or send a blank email to leave-7843-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism
Along those same lines, this past weekend's NPR "On the Media" dealt witht he same topic. It was most informative. DKH On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Jim Clark wrote: > Hi > > The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with > Seth Mnookin, who has a book out on the vaccine - autism controversy. In > the part I heard, he gave a very reasonable response on some of the claims > made and harm done by the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at: > > http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2011/01/11/panic-virus---seth-mnookin/ > > Some of his final points included the false impression given by so-called > "balanced reporting" on controversial issues, and the importance of having > reporters who understand science. I haven't read his book, but it sounds > like it might be useful on this issue. > > Take care > Jim > > > James M. Clark > Professor of Psychology > 204-786-9757 > 204-774-4134 Fax > j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: dhogb...@albion.edu. > To unsubscribe click here: > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13152.d92d7ec47187a662aacda2d4b4c7628e&n=T&l=tips&o=7841 > or send a blank email to > leave-7841-13152.d92d7ec47187a662aacda2d4b4c76...@fsulist.frostburg.edu > -- David K. Hogberg, PhD Professor of Psychology, Emeritus Department of Psychological Science Albion College Albion MI 49224 Tel: 517/629-4834, Mobile: 517/262-1277 --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7842 or send a blank email to leave-7842-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
[tips] Mnookin on Vaccine and Autism
Hi The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with Seth Mnookin, who has a book out on the vaccine - autism controversy. In the part I heard, he gave a very reasonable response on some of the claims made and harm done by the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2011/01/11/panic-virus---seth-mnookin/ Some of his final points included the false impression given by so-called "balanced reporting" on controversial issues, and the importance of having reporters who understand science. I haven't read his book, but it sounds like it might be useful on this issue. Take care Jim James M. Clark Professor of Psychology 204-786-9757 204-774-4134 Fax j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7841 or send a blank email to leave-7841-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Chair advice?
If your department has graduate programs, there is a Council of chairs of graduate program in psychology (COGDOP) that has a listserv and an annual meeting. The chair of the UWF psychology program has always been involved with that group. I just googled them and they have a web site: http://www.cogdop.org/ Locally, the three colleges created an All Chairs group that is organized by a triumverate of chairs from each of the three colleges. The group meets periodically - usually at least once a term but more often as needs arise. The group functions as peer mentoring and a means of communication among chairs and between chairs and other administrators. I'm not a chair, but I attend this group's meetings to assist with questions about assessment and faculty development. Either Stylus or Jossey-Bass have some books on being a chair. Check their web sites. I've got a few of these in the CUTLA library (you can search that from the web site). There are some good books on administration in HE in general. Peter Seldin has a book on creating an administrative portfolio - like a teaching portfolio - that addresses some of these issues. Robert Diamond edited a book, *Field Guide to Academic Leadership *(2002 / Jossey-Bass) that has excellent advice. Jossey-Bass publishes *The Academic Chair's Handbook *(now in a second edition). Jossey-Bass also publishes a newsletter called *The Department Chair.* ** Claudia J. Stanny, Ph.D. Director Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Associate Professor School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences University of West Florida 11000 University Parkway Pensacola, FL 32514 – 5751 Phone: (850) 857-6355 or 473-7435 csta...@uwf.edu CUTLA Web Site: http://uwf.edu/cutla/ Personal Web Pages: http://uwf.edu/cstanny/website/index.htm On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Carol DeVolder wrote: > > Hi, > Now that I am once again able to see and respond to messages on TIPS, I > have a question that is only tangentially related to teaching of psychology. > Do any of you have resources on the ins and outs of being a good chair? Are > there listservs for that? I've read books on it, but I'm still dissatisfied. > My biggest issue is the area of conflict management. I suppose I could > Google it, but I thought your collective wisdom might be better. > > Thanks, > Carol > > -- > Carol DeVolder, Ph.D. > Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology > St. Ambrose University > 518 West Locust Street > Davenport, Iowa 52803 > 563-333-6482 > > This e-mail might be confidential, so please don't share it. > > > > --- > > You are currently subscribed to tips as: csta...@uwf.edu. > > To unsubscribe click here: > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d550&n=T&l=tips&o=7838 > > (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) > > or send a blank email to > leave-7838-13144.1572ed60024e708cf21c4c6f19e7d...@fsulist.frostburg.edu > --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7840 or send a blank email to leave-7840-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re: [tips] Chair advice?
Carol: Have you seen this site? http://www.acenet.edu/resources/chairs/ Ken --- Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D. steel...@appstate.edu Professor and Assistant Chairperson Department of Psychology http://www.psych.appstate.edu Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608 USA --- Carol DeVolder wrote: Hi, Now that I am once again able to see and respond to messages on TIPS, I have a question that is only tangentially related to teaching of psychology. Do any of you have resources on the ins and outs of being a good chair? Are there listservs for that? I've read books on it, but I'm still dissatisfied. My biggest issue is the area of conflict management. I suppose I could Google it, but I thought your collective wisdom might be better. Thanks, Carol -- Carol DeVolder, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology St. Ambrose University 518 West Locust Street Davenport, Iowa 52803 563-333-6482 This e-mail might be confidential, so please don't share it. --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7839 or send a blank email to leave-7839-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
[tips] Chair advice?
Hi, Now that I am once again able to see and respond to messages on TIPS, I have a question that is only tangentially related to teaching of psychology. Do any of you have resources on the ins and outs of being a good chair? Are there listservs for that? I've read books on it, but I'm still dissatisfied. My biggest issue is the area of conflict management. I suppose I could Google it, but I thought your collective wisdom might be better. Thanks, Carol -- Carol DeVolder, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology St. Ambrose University 518 West Locust Street Davenport, Iowa 52803 563-333-6482 This e-mail might be confidential, so please don't share it. --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7838 or send a blank email to leave-7838-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
RE: [tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:36:44 -0800, Paul C Bernhardt wrote: >I see no problem, also. I thought that the grade distribution was public >information for those of us teaching at public institutions (unless the class >has fewer than 10 students, then it can't be released by FERPA rules). Well, clearly opinions differ on this position which may be why SUNY-New Paltz had to await a Freedom of Information request before releasing its grades. The fact that not all colleges in the U.S. are listed on the CourseRank page (again, Harvard, etc.), including public institutions such as UC-Los Angeles, UC-Irvine, UC-San Diego (though other UC schools such as Berkeley, Merced, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, etc. are listed) suggests that not all institutions agree that such information is or should be public. I'm sure that this issue will be settled in the courts. I would, however, ask that people seriously consider what info is actually on the CourseRank website. Relying upon one's experience with previous attempts to provide course grades is one thing but what might be on the CR website might be considerably different (unless, of course, your administration never makes bureaucratic errors when it comes to filing and reporting grades). -Mike Palij New York University m...@nyu.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7836 or send a blank email to leave-7836-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
Re:[tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses
A company, Pic-a-Prof, sued the entire California State University to get access to grade distributions. At first, I think some faculty were alarmed, particularly those part-timers who have less job security. After all the hoopla, nothing really became of it. Rob Rob Weisskirch, MSW. Ph.D. Associate Professor of Human Development Certified Family Life Educator Liberal Studies Department California State University, Monterey Bay 100 Campus Center, Building 82C Seaside, CA 93955 (831) 582-5079 rweisski...@csumb.edu This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential, privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7835 or send a blank email to leave-7835-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
RE: [tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses
Our son went to Indiana about ten years ago. When his grades arrived , we were very surprized. The report listed how any students in the class received As, Bs, Cs, Ds, and Fs. I use to go to Ratemyprofessor, but I gave up a few years ago. I would read the ratings and say, "Hey, how about my side of the story? This student didn't come to class, didn't do the assignments,etc." I work really hard to get my students to do well. The bottom line is coming to class, doing assignments, reading the text, and studying for tests is what the students need to do. Jim Jim Matiya Visiting Instructor in Psychology Florida Gulf Coast University jmat...@fgcu.edu > Subject: RE: [tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:36:35 -0500 > From: pcbernha...@frostburg.edu > To: tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu > > I see no problem, also. I thought that the grade distribution was public > information for those of us teaching at public institutions (unless the class > has fewer than 10 students, then it can't be released by FERPA rules). > > When I was an undergraduate at Georgia Tech an enterprising group of students > started rating professors based on student feedback. They put forms in drop > boxes on campus (how they got permission, I don't know). Students filled them > out and they collected the ratings (this was before institutionalized teacher > evaluations were done) and comments. If you remember those days, you also > remember grades being posted on the teacher's office door, often listed by > student number which was your SSN (!) for the longest time. So, getting the > grade distribution for nearly all classes was just an exercise in walking the > hallways the week after finals. So, grade distributions were published, too. > They published it in book form and sold it for a few bucks. It was always too > late to use for the next quarter, but it was useful for many terms later. We > bought them in droves. > > I see sites like ratemyprofessor as the same thing as that book from over 30 > years ago. I'm surprised students don't enter information into it more. > > Paul C. Bernhardt > Department of Psychology > Frostburg State University > Frostburg, Maryland > > > > -Original Message- > From: don allen [mailto:dap...@shaw.ca] > Sent: Mon 1/10/2011 9:03 PM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) > Subject: Re: [tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses > > Hi Miguel- > > I don't see a problem with this at all. In fact, I think that it is a > positive. Really not very different than ratemyprofessors.com. If I were to > become a student again (in a formal sense; I hope I never stop being a > student) I would want to have access to a resource like this. I once worked > with a person who regularly failed half of his class. By midterm, his class > of 15 (all he could muster) was down to seven. A lot of the students didn't > even bother to attend his classes. I once walked down the hall and saw him > lecturing to TWO! students. If these students had had access to course eval > information and grade distributions they would have voted with their feet & > we could have gotten rid of him far more quickly. Information empowers. Sure, > some will use it in the search for the "easy A", but others will use it to > avoid the (hopefully few) toxic profs. > > -Don. > > - Original Message - > From: roig-rear...@comcast.net > Date: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:17 pm > Subject: [tips] Revealing the grade distributions for our courses > To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" > > > > > > > > This weekend's edition of the NY Times included the Education > > Life section, which had an interesting opinion piece about how a > > private company used the Freedom of Information Act > > to successfully force professors at one state university to > > reveal the grade distributions for their courses. > > > > > > > > From the article: > > > > > > > > "The company is in the process of uploading the grades on > > CourseRank.com , a class planning Web site that Chegg acquired > > in August. Students who register for CourseRank will be able to > > take into account a professor's grade distribution, along with > > peer reviews and ratings, when deciding whether to take a > > class". > > > > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/education/edlife/09notebook- > > t.html?_r=1&ref=edlife > > > > > > > > The piece raises a number of questions: Will students begin to > > make course section selections based on the instructor's grading > > profile? Does this approach further encourage grade inflation? > > > > > > > > Miguel > > > > > > --- > > You are currently subscribed to tips as: dap...@shaw.ca. > > To unsubscribe click here: > > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98f18&n=T&l=tips&o=7814or > > send a blank email to > > leave-7814-13157.966b795bc7f3ccb35e3da08aebe98...@fsulist.frostbur
[tips] Statistical analysis & Bem's ESP article
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/science/11esp.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha210 Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology Danish Institute for Study Abroad (DIS), +45 2065 1360 Dickinson College (on leave 2010/2011) http://users.dickinson.edu/~helwegm/index.html --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7829 or send a blank email to leave-7829-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
