[tips] Time To Learn About Voltage-Gated Calcium-Channel Signaling

2013-02-27 Thread Mike Palij

A psychiatric research study just published in "The Lancet" focuses
on the common genetic basis for five psychiatric disorders.  A
popular media account is provided by Medscape though this news
is rapidly being disseminated through many outlets.  Quoting
from the Medscape article:

|Investigators from the Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric 
|Genomics Consortium have found that autism spectrum disorder 
|(ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar 
|disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia 
|share common genetic risk factors.

|
|Specifically, the results of the genome-wide association study 
|(GWAS) reveal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 
|2 genes - CACNA1C and CACNB2 - both of which 
|are involved in the balance of calcium in brain cells, are 
|implicated in several of these disorders, and could provide 
|a potential target for new treatments.

|
|"This analysis provides the first genome-wide evidence that 
|individual and aggregate molecular genetic risk factors are 
|shared between 5 childhood-onset or adult-onset psychiatric 
|disorders that are treated as distinct categories in clinical 
|practice," study investigator Jordan Smoller, MD, Massachusetts 
|General Hospital, Boston, said in a release.


And:

|The investigators add that the study results "implicate a specific 
|biological pathway - voltage-gated calcium-channel signalling - 
|as a contributor to the pathogenesis of several psychiatric disorders, 
|and support the potential of this pathway as a therapeutic target 
|for psychiatric disease."

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/779979

So, is replicated and supported, these results may change how 
we think that these disorders develop -- though I imagine that 
a diathesis-stress model might be needed to explain certain 
specific disorders -- and suggest new treatments that may have 
little to do with the medications that we use today.  One wonders 
whether psychotherapy will also be altered as a result.


-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23996
or send a blank email to 
leave-23996-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


re:[tips] Some movement disorders may be rooted in the brain............................ Well, duh!

2013-02-27 Thread Mike Palij

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:25:15 -0800, Edward Pollak wrote:
[snip]

1) I don't think it's at all trivial to acjknowledge that all behavior is
rooted in brain activity.


Yeah, except for the spinal reflexes and other monosynaptic reflexes
that don't involve the brain in the behavioral response like in the patellar
reflex.  See:
http://michaeldmann.net/mann15.html


Witness the number of unapologetic dualists publishing at a prolific
rate and by the use of terms like "psychogenic."


I don't even know what you're trying to say here except that you
disagree with some how some researchers use language.


2) I had thought that the entire notion of functional vs. organic illness
was long defunct.


If you have a copy of DSM-IV handy, look at the entry for "somatoform
disorders".  There is currently much debate about how such a group of
disorders should be included in DSM-V.  Remember, if a medical condition
has a well understood biological basis and a person presents with the 
condition
but doesn't have the biological basis, what do you attribute their symptoms 
to?

The person's condition is functionally similar to that of a person with an
identifiable biological basis but apparently is based on some other basis,
historically, on psychological processes -- processes that could lead to the
simulation of the condition.
See, for example:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17278912
and
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044887/
NOTE:  if one can explain symptoms through the use of psychological
processes, such as attention focusing, symptom catastrophizing, and so
on, then it seems most reasonable to assume that some form of psychological
therapy would be appropriate instead of medical treatment.

The article that Ed originally linked to was attempting to show that
there was a neurological anomaly in processing associated with the
movement disorder.  Many researchers are now trying to demonstrate
this through neuroimaging or other brain activity measures (e.g., EEG)
with "functional" disorders.

Consider the case of "hysterical blindness", that is, a person claims total 
or

partial blindness but has no detectable problem with the eyes, the areas of
the brain associated with visual processing and so on.  Here is one case
study that was published in 2011:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21368085
NOTE:  measures of brain activity before and after SUCCESSFUL treatment
with psychodynamic therapy of the condition suggest that there are some 
subtle

neural processing differences.  For the complete article, see:
http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/10/2394.long

The real problem here, as I see it, is that functional disorders are treated
differently from organic disorders by INSURANCE COMPANIES
because there is no parity between payment for psychological treatment
and medical treatment.  Once parity is achieved, purely scientific issues
can be focused on.

(And just for the record, I was making fun of the headline in the popular 
press

and not of the research in question.)


Methinks that you should have said this in your original post.

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu 



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23991
or send a blank email to 
leave-23991-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


re:[tips] Some movement disorders may be rooted in the brain............................ Well, duh!

2013-02-27 Thread Pollak, Edward (Retired)
Mike Palij wriote, "I'm having a hard time understanding Ed's post. Perhaps he
is saying "Hey, the movement/muscle disorder either it has a neurological
basis in the brain or it is psychological based (i.e., psychogenic) and
that's too is in brain! It's all in the brain!" Which is a pretty trivial
point and misses, well, the point. Perhaps Ed doesn't know what
psychogenic illnesses are (e.g., as described here:
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/psychogenic_movement/psychogenic_movement.htm
 )
that is, disorders that manifest themselves in some physical manner,
such a abnormal movement or blindness or pain or fatigue and
so on without any obvious organic or physical basis. If there
is no organic basis, then either a psychological explanation or
malingering might be considered. These types of "functional"
disorders are often stigmatized by both the medical community
(because there is no objective basis for the disorder) and the
public (who think that the person is just faking it for some sort
of secondary gain). The point of the research being reported
is that movement disorders that have a genetic (i.e., known
organic) basis and psychogenic basis have brain activity that
is different from normal people just "faking". If this is trivial,
I'd like to know why."



1) I don't think it's at all trivial to acjknowledge that all behavior is 
rooted in brain activity. Witness the number of unapologetic dualists 
publishing at a prolific rate and by the use of terms like "psychogenic." 2) I 
had thought that the entire notion of functional vs. organic illness was long 
defunct. Defining an illness as "functional" (i.e., not organic) simply because 
you don't know the biological basis is, IMO, patently absurd. When I was an 
undergraduate, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, etc., etc., were 
all considered "functional" disorders. Only things like Korsakoff's syndrome or 
general paresis were trotted out as examples of disorders with an "organic 
basis." The organic causes of "functional" or "psychogenic" disorders may be 
less obvious but they are there.

(And just for the record, I was making fun of the headline in the popular press 
and not of the research in question.)

Ed


Edward I. Pollak, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Psychology
West Chester University of Pennsylvania
http://home.comcast.net/~epollak/
Husband, father, grandfather, bluegrass fiddler, banjoist & 
biopsychologist... in approximate order of importance



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=23989
or send a blank email to 
leave-23989-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu