RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. 

I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This time I am working 
out as best I can the critical failure point, but essentially a valid WAR is 
not being deployed and it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib 
folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom context 
listeners. On auto deploy the error yields web.xml cannot be found which is 
false. Depending on how many JARs I delete from the LIB folder, the WAR 
explodes or does not with the error.

I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the process I have gone 
through.

Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 Henri Gomez wrote:
  Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
 
 Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable 
 at this point.
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and 
may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; 
if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error 
please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action 
and avoid troubling you further.  Any views expressed in this message are those 
of the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, 
monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party.  Your 
messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be 
necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its 
reputation.  

Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS 
Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with 
your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or 
computer problems experienced.
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
i take this back, it's only 5.5.9 that is exhibiting this behaviour, 5.5.12 
fully explodes the war correctly.

 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley 
 Sent: 06 October 2005 10:53
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. 
 
 I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This 
 time I am working out as best I can the critical failure 
 point, but essentially a valid WAR is not being deployed and 
 it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib 
 folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom 
 context listeners. On auto deploy the error yields web.xml 
 cannot be found which is false. Depending on how many JARs I 
 delete from the LIB folder, the WAR explodes or does not with 
 the error.
 
 I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the 
 process I have gone through.
 
 Allistair.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49
  To: Tomcat Developers List
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
  
  
  Henri Gomez wrote:
   Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
  
  Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable 
  at this point.
  
  Rémy
  
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
 Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is 
 confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended 
 solely for the named recipient only; if you are not 
 authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
 this message or any part of it. If you have received this 
 message in error please contact the sender at once so that we 
 may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you 
 further.  Any views expressed in this message are those of 
 the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to 
 record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees 
 and any third party.  Your messages shall be subject to such 
 lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in 
 order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation.  
 
 Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound 
 emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are 
 virus free or compatible with your systems and does not 
 accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer 
 problems experienced.
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, will let you know 
the result.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 Yoav Shapira wrote:
  Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
  [X] Stable - no major issues,
 
 It looks good enough to me.
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and 
may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; 
if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error 
please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action 
and avoid troubling you further.  Any views expressed in this message are those 
of the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, 
monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party.  Your 
messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be 
necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its 
reputation.  

Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS 
Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with 
your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or 
computer problems experienced.
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

2005-10-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi,

I've tested our intranet app on 5.5.12. Our application uses the following 
extensively;

NTLM authentication via IIS5/JK1.2
META-INF/context.xml configuration
8 JNDI datasources (mix of various SQL Server 2K databases and JavaMail)
Log4J
Hibernate
Spring
Struts
CMS

Seems a touch faster than usual to me but this is speculation.

The only issue that was reported is lots of these:

org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: URI was not reported to parser for entity 
[document]
at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.warn(SAXDriver.java:934)

These are only WARN level and do not appear to have affected the operation of 
the web app, however there are at least 10 of these stack traces in the logs 
which *may* confuse some users to think Tomcat is failing.

These only occur for Spring's applicationContext file which has a DTD of

!DOCTYPE beans PUBLIC -//SPRING//DTD BEAN//EN 
http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans.dtd;

My verdict based on testing is

[X] Stable - no major issues

Cheers, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley 
 Sent: 05 October 2005 10:57
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
 
 
 i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, 
 will let you know the result.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44
  To: Tomcat Developers List
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
  
  
  Yoav Shapira wrote:
   Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
   [X] Stable - no major issues,
  
  It looks good enough to me.
  
  Rémy
  
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLACK 
 Disclaimer:  The information contained within this e-mail is 
 confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended 
 solely for the named recipient only; if you are not 
 authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain 
 this message or any part of it. If you have received this 
 message in error please contact the sender at once so that we 
 may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you 
 further.  Any views expressed in this message are those of 
 the individual sender.  QAS Limited has the right lawfully to 
 record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees 
 and any third party.  Your messages shall be subject to such 
 lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in 
 order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation.  
 
 Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound 
 emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are 
 virus free or compatible with your systems and does not 
 accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer 
 problems experienced.
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [ANN] Servlet and JSP APIs have moved to subversion

2005-09-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi Remy,

I've been thinking about the Tomcat online documentation for quite a long time 
now, and have wanted to do something to enhance them for the community. I think 
I am going to be able to get back to doing this shortly. I've been looking at 
how other open-source projects that I consider to be very well documented 
approach documentation, and was most impressed with Christian Bauer's use of 
DocBook for Hibernate's HTML and PDF documentation. DocBook is a schema for 
defining books and one uses XSL to translate to HTML or PDF renditions. I've 
set this up on my PC and have purchased a decent XML editor for the task, but 
I'm keen to learn whether you would consider even approaching the documentation 
differently.

All the best, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 06 September 2005 15:08
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [ANN] Servlet and JSP APIs have moved to subversion
 
 
 Mark Thomas wrote:
  The following CVS modules have been migrated to subversion
  
  jakarta-servletapi
  jakarta-servletapi-4
  jakarta-servletapi-5
  
  These modules are now read only in CVS.
  
  The new SVN locations are:
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/servletapi/branches/ser
 vlet2.2-jsp1.1-tc3.x/ 
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/servletapi/branches/ser
 vlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/ 
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/servletapi/servlet2.4-j
 sp2.0-tc5.x/
  
  NB Committers wishing to make changes to these modules will 
 need to use 
  https as per 
 http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn
  
  TC34 will move next (phase 4), followed by TC5, Connectors 
 and Jasper2 
  (phase 5). A more detailed schedule, particularly for phase 
 5 since this 
  is the focus of development, will be posted on the tomcat-dev list 
  nearer the time.
 
 It seems to work well !
 
 What's the next step ?
 
 I looked into the website work, and I think it should be enough to 
 simply add a page for mailing lists and downloads (for 
 starters, other 
 pages can be added as needed). For the latter, what are the 
 preferences 
 ? One like jakarta.apache.org, or a much simpler one like 
 httpd.apache.org ?
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [ANN] Servlet and JSP APIs have moved to subversion

2005-09-06 Thread Allistair Crossley
I've taken a look at Hibernate's DocBook usage and it appears to cover most of 
what the Tomcat documentation needs (chapters, paras, lists, code snippets, 
tables), but as you say, I will experiment with a chapter or two and upload it 
somewhere for you to take a look, hopefully it will be worthwhile ...

Will be in touch, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 06 September 2005 15:36
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [ANN] Servlet and JSP APIs have moved to subversion
 
 
 Allistair Crossley wrote:
  Hi Remy,
  
  I've been thinking about the Tomcat online documentation for quite a
  long time now, and have wanted to do something to enhance them for
  the community. I think I am going to be able to get back to doing
  this shortly. I've been looking at how other open-source projects
  that I consider to be very well documented approach documentation,
  and was most impressed with Christian Bauer's use of DocBook for
  Hibernate's HTML and PDF documentation. DocBook is a schema for
  defining books and one uses XSL to translate to HTML or PDF
  renditions. I've set this up on my PC and have purchased a 
 decent XML
  editor for the task, but I'm keen to learn whether you 
 would consider
  even approaching the documentation differently.
 
 Ok, feel free to experiment. The main drawback is that the 
 DTD is more 
 complicated. Besides that, it would produce better results.
 
 Rémy
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Postcard

2005-01-19 Thread Allistair Crossley
*rotfl* that's not Remy at all! ;)

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 19 January 2005 15:14
 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
 Subject: Postcard
 
 
 Best wishes,
 
  your friend.
 
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
+1

Not a developer, but we use JK for all our IIS5-Tomcat5.5 requests and also for 
uploading files to our server. We've seen JK broken in the past (stream 
termination, request processing errors and another recent one) all appear to 
have been fixed with 1.2.8.

Cheers, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 04 January 2005 18:43
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability
 
 
 Jess Holle wrote:
  For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this 
 vote, it would 
  seem to be extraordinarily slow
 
 
 Yes. Seems like seasons time :).
 
 Mladen.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not found. (tomcat debug logging)

2004-12-17 Thread Allistair Crossley
 java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not
 found. (trace logging)
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Allistair Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:18 AM
 Subject: RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not
 found. (trace logging)
 
 
  Hi,
 
  OK, just generated it again, and taken more trace ... I can 
 see this ERROR
 ...
 
  [Thu Dec 16 16:14:22 2004] [2196:1556] [error]
 ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (857): ERROR: 
 can't receive
 the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down
 (127.0.0.1:8009), err=-1
 
  Tomcat is *not* down though ;)
 
 
 The tomcat is down is IIS's response to Tomcat dropping the 
 connection
 after the exception.
 
 It's strange that the 'bad' message and the 'good' retry 
 message seem to be
 identical (and perfectly valid AJP/1.3 packets).  Of course,  
 JK1.2.8-RC1
 will send different packets now that Mladen has fixed header 
 parsing, but
 both forms are valid.  In particular, the Content-Length is 
 the string 0.
 
 I'd love to see the dump from the Tomcat side if you get a chance.
 
 
 
 
 
 This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) 
 listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain 
 information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are 
 not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
 distribute this message or any attachment. If you received 
 this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
 e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
 
 In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) 
 e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send 
 confidential or sensitive information, such as social 
 security numbers, account numbers, personal identification 
 numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
 
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT



RE: JK 1.2.7 beta 3 + URL rewriting scheme issue

2004-12-16 Thread Allistair Crossley
derrick, I have changed the subject for this email as you hijacked my one which 
i am still researching.

 -Original Message-
 From: Derrick Koes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 15 December 2004 23:19
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Cc: Tim Lucia
 Subject: RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not
 found.
 
 
  
 
 I've been testing JK 1.2.7 beta 3 +.
 
 For some reason, putting the jsessionid (URL rewriting) on 
 the URL makes JK not deliver it to Tomcat (get a new session 
 from tomcat for every request).  Running the same web app 
 with JK2 does not exhibit the problem.  
 HttpServletRequest.isRequestedSessionIdFromURL() returns true 
 for the JK2 configuration, but false for the JK configuration.
 
 I'm assuming it must be JK that decides to remove it from the 
 URL (different URL rewriting scheme?), but I suppose it 
 *could* be a bug in Tomcat HttpServletRequest implementation. 
  Does anyone have any suggestions?
 Below is a sample URL.
 http://dkoesxp/ilt/rd/b73d019ee9a5d0e5d43c2c64831b9f05/ilt/Ins
 tructorLedTraining.do;jsessionid=F63D242A6554BC9C5A2CF8D00D613
 F3F.dkoesxp:8009
 
 The url rewriting part:
 
 ;jsessionid=F63D242A6554BC9C5A2CF8D00D613F3F.dkoesxp:8009
 
 Thanks,
 Derrick
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:07 PM
 To: Tomcat Developers List; Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when 
 JSP is not found.
 
 Hi,
  
 Will add trace logging first thing tomorrow morning and let 
 you know. I really don't want to get a reputation for being 
 imaginative you know ;) but this looked pretty much the 
 direct cause to me, but I being to doubt myself ;) The stack 
 trace certainly is not my imagination, I did afterall paste 
 it into the email ;)
  
 Will come back to you tomorrow, Cheers, Allistair.
 
   -Original Message- 
   From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Sent: Wed 15/12/2004 19:43 
   To: Tomcat Developers List 
   Cc: 
   Subject: Re: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException 
 when JSP is not found.
   
   
 
   Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi Mladen,
   
Just a follow-up on this decoding issue in JK. I have 
 just this moment accidentally come upon a scenario where I 
 can generate this error.
   
You can generate it by requesting a JSP that does not 
 exist, so long as you have a /*.jsp mapping in urimapping.properties.
   
   
   Did on IIS/WINXP/1.2.7-beta-3
   
   No mater what files I'm asking existing or not I can 
 not reproduce the
   error. Tested on 5.5.6 and 5.0.30.
   Really have no clue how to reproduce that.
   
   Please try turning log_level to trace, clear the logs, 
 restart IIS,
   and post the jk log file.
   
   Otherwise we are stuck :(.
   
   Regards,
   Mladen.
   
   
   
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
 
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Developers of QuickAddress Software
 a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT
 
 
 
 


RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not found. (trace logging)

2004-12-16 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi Guys,

Well I have trace logging on but there do not appear to be errors in the logs. 
You can clearly see from the timestamps on the logging below that the errors 
are linked to each other. As soon as I request a JSP that does not exist, e.g I 
request

http://testserver/nosuchjsp.jsp

I get the NumberFormatException in Tomcat stdout and I correctly get the 
standard Tomcat 404 error page. 

Does this trace logging help anymore?

Cheers, Allistair.

STDOUT
==

Dec 16, 2004 2:19:08 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
SEVERE: Error decoding request 
java.lang.NumberFormatException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.Ascii.parseInt(Ascii.java:145)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.getInt(ByteChunk.java:491)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes.getInt(MessageBytes.java:645)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeHeaders(HandlerRequest.java:682)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:504)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:361)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:745)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:868)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Dec 16, 2004 2:19:08 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection
WARNING: processCallbacks status 2

JK
===

[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] ajp_get_reply::jk_ajp_common.c 
(1329): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (846): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): received from ajp13 
pos=0 len=86 max=8192 
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 04 01 94 00 0E 
2F 6E 6F 73 75 63 68 6A 73 70 2E  - ./nosuchjsp.
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 00106A 73 70 00 00 
02 00 0C 43 6F 6E 74 65 6E 74 2D  - jsp.Content-
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 002054 79 70 65 00 
00 17 74 65 78 74 2F 68 74 6D 6C  - Type...text/html
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 00303B 63 68 61 72 
73 65 74 3D 75 74 66 2D 38 00 00  - ;charset=utf-8..
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 00400E 43 6F 6E 74 
65 6E 74 2D 4C 65 6E 67 74 68 00  - .Content-Length.
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 005000 03 39 39 32 
00 6D 69 6C 79 3A 54 61 68 6F 6D  - ..992.mily:Tahom
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (935): exit
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_process_callback::jk_ajp_common.c (1220): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (522): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (538): status = 404
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (544): Number of headers is = 2
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (599): Header[0] [Content-Type] = 
[text/html;charset=utf-8]
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (599): Header[1] [Content-Length] = 
[992]
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (606): exit
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
start_response::jk_isapi_plugin.c (385): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
start_response::jk_isapi_plugin.c (451): exit
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [trace] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (846): enter
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): received from ajp13 
pos=0 len=996 max=8192 
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 03 03 E0 3C 68 
74 6D 6C 3E 3C 68 65 61 64 3E 3C  - ...htmlhead
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 001074 69 74 6C 65 
3E 41 70 61 63 68 65 20 54 6F 6D  - titleApache.Tom
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (930): 002063 61 74 2F 35 
2E 35 2E 35 20 2D 20 45 72 72 6F  - cat/5.5.5.-.Erro
[Thu Dec 16 14:19:08 2004] [2196:2232] [debug] 

RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not found. (trace logging)

2004-12-16 Thread Allistair Crossley
] ajp_done::jk_ajp_common.c 
(1865): recycling connection
[Thu Dec 16 16:14:22 2004] [2196:1556] [trace] ajp_done::jk_ajp_common.c 
(1867): exit

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 16 December 2004 15:38
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not
 found. (trace logging)
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Allistair Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:22 AM
 Subject: RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when 
 JSP is not 
 found. (trace logging)
 
 
  Hi Guys,
 
  Well I have trace logging on but there do not appear to be 
 errors in the 
  logs. You can clearly see from the timestamps on the 
 logging below that 
  the errors are linked to each other. As soon as I request a 
 JSP that does 
  not exist, e.g I request
 
  http://testserver/nosuchjsp.jsp
 
  I get the NumberFormatException in Tomcat stdout and I 
 correctly get the 
  standard Tomcat 404 error page.
 
  Does this trace logging help anymore?
 
 
 After the 'processCallbacks status 2', Tomcat will drop the 
 connection to 
 IIS, and certainly not continue with the request.  The Tomcat 
 exception 
 should look like an error in the IIS logs.  The relevant part 
 of the Jk log 
 is probably the part above this.
 
  Cheers, Allistair.
 
 
 
 This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) 
 listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain 
 information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are 
 not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
 distribute this message or any attachment. If you received 
 this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
 e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
 
 In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) 
 e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send 
 confidential or sensitive information, such as social 
 security numbers, account numbers, personal identification 
 numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
 
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT



RE: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?

2004-12-15 Thread Allistair Crossley
Dear Remy,

OK, you were right : ;) Our build file was secretly copying web.xml to the 
web application causing a web app reload. 

Sorry about that, but it was restarting at least on JSP copies ;) 

Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley 
 Sent: 14 December 2004 22:04
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?
 
 
 I had a quick go at this like you probably did with something 
 simple, and there is certainly no web application reload in 
 this circumstance. 
  
 The web application in question is configured with JNDI 
 datasources and log4j. The architecture of the application 
 uses Struts and Tiles for JSPs. I think I am going to have to 
 try to take copy of the application and work it backwards to 
 see where/what causes the Tomcat web app reload. 
  
 We use Ant to build the web application. For development JSPs 
 this is a simple copy to the web app folder. For classes, 
 they are compiled. Static resources and config files are also copied. 
  
 I had the issue in question all day today. All I was doing 
 was making textual changes to a JSP. I used Ant to copy them 
 across (which we have been doing since April 2004) and then 
 made a request to a Struts action (which then return the JSP 
 in question). A white page is shown (or partial HTML page). 
 Looking in stdout, you can see the web application has been 
 reinitialised. The Ant build output shows no compilation of 
 classes, so the reloadable aspect of Tomcat should not in my 
 view be triggered. 
  
 Thinking about it harder, I can say with 85% surity that this 
 started happening with around 5.5.4 (since I always upgrade 
 our test server on the day of a new Tomcat release). 
  
 I don't know what else to add really at this point. I will 
 perform some further tests tomorrow to narrow it down if I 
 can, but this is an issue with *something*, it's just finding 
 out where. It could be as simple as Ant is touching class 
 files when it should not (which it never used to so I doubt 
 it) or it could be something in Tomcat but I would not know what/why.
  
 Will let you know if I find any more hard links to what 
 causes the issue.
  
 Allistair.
 
   -Original Message- 
   From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Sent: Tue 14/12/2004 17:07 
   To: Tomcat Developers List 
   Cc: 
   Subject: Re: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?
   
   
 
   Allistair Crossley wrote:
   
   Myself and my developers have noticed that with our 
 new 5.5 development Tomcats changes to JSPs now cause Tomcat 
 to reload our web applications.

   
   I cannot reproduce this.
   
   Is this expected behaviour? Perhaps the new JDT 
 compiler? Can it be stopped without using reloadable=false? 
 We don't use anti JAR locking either.

   
   You have a vivid imagination. What else ?
   
   Rmy
   
   
   
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
 
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Developers of QuickAddress Software
 a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT
 
 


RE: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?

2004-12-15 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi,

Yep, sure enough 5.5.5's context.xml has 

WatchedResourceWEB-INF/web.xml/WatchedResource

Cool. Thanks. I just stopped Ant from doing an explicit copy of web.xml unless 
the file has changed like everything else, and that works fine too.

Cheers, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 15 December 2004 13:57
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?
 
 
 Allistair Crossley wrote:
 
 Our build file was secretly copying web.xml to the web 
 application causing a web app reload. 
   
 
 I think earlier versions (like 5.0.x) used to watch web.xml as well.
 
 If you don't like the feature, you can edit the list of watched 
 resources in conf/context.xml.
 
 Rmy
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT



JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not found.

2004-12-15 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi Mladen,

Just a follow-up on this decoding issue in JK. I have just this moment 
accidentally come upon a scenario where I can generate this error.

You can generate it by requesting a JSP that does not exist, so long as you 
have a /*.jsp mapping in urimapping.properties.

I don't know if this is an error with JK or not, but I assume that not finding 
a JSP should not cause a NumberFormatException?

SEVERE: Error decoding request 
java.lang.NumberFormatException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.Ascii.parseInt(Ascii.java:145)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.getInt(ByteChunk.java:491)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes.getInt(MessageBytes.java:645)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeHeaders(HandlerRequest.java:682)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:504)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:361)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:745)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:868)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:31 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection
WARNING: processCallbacks status 2
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:31 PM org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler action
INFO: Response already commited 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],0,java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: setActiveDataNative [-5115]
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
SEVERE: Error decoding request 
java.lang.NumberFormatException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.Ascii.parseInt(Ascii.java:145)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.getInt(ByteChunk.java:491)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes.getInt(MessageBytes.java:645)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeHeaders(HandlerRequest.java:682)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:504)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:361)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:745)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:868)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection
WARNING: processCallbacks status 2
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:32 PM org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler action
INFO: Response already commited 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],0,java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: setActiveDataNative [-5115]
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:33 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
SEVERE: Error decoding request 
java.lang.NumberFormatException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.Ascii.parseInt(Ascii.java:145)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.getInt(ByteChunk.java:491)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes.getInt(MessageBytes.java:645)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeHeaders(HandlerRequest.java:682)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:504)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:361)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:745)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:868)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:33 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection
WARNING: processCallbacks status 2
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:33 PM org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler action
INFO: Response already commited 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],0,java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: setActiveDataNative [-5115]
Dec 15, 2004 5:59:34 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
SEVERE: Error decoding request 
java.lang.NumberFormatException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.Ascii.parseInt(Ascii.java:145)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.getInt(ByteChunk.java:491)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.MessageBytes.getInt(MessageBytes.java:645)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeHeaders(HandlerRequest.java:682)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:504)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:361)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:745)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at 

RE: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not found.

2004-12-15 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi,
 
Will add trace logging first thing tomorrow morning and let you know. I really 
don't want to get a reputation for being imaginative you know ;) but this 
looked pretty much the direct cause to me, but I being to doubt myself ;) The 
stack trace certainly is not my imagination, I did afterall paste it into the 
email ;)
 
Will come back to you tomorrow, Cheers, Allistair.

-Original Message- 
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wed 15/12/2004 19:43 
To: Tomcat Developers List 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: JK throws java.lang.NumberFormatException when JSP is not 
found.



Allistair Crossley wrote:
 Hi Mladen,

 Just a follow-up on this decoding issue in JK. I have just this 
moment accidentally come upon a scenario where I can generate this error.

 You can generate it by requesting a JSP that does not exist, so long 
as you have a /*.jsp mapping in urimapping.properties.


Did on IIS/WINXP/1.2.7-beta-3

No mater what files I'm asking existing or not I can not reproduce the
error. Tested on 5.5.6 and 5.0.30.
Really have no clue how to reproduce that.

Please try turning log_level to trace, clear the logs, restart IIS,
and post the jk log file.

Otherwise we are stuck :(.

Regards,
Mladen.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT



JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?

2004-12-14 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi Remy,

I have a quick question that I'd like to ask that I don't think anyone on the 
user list is going to be able to answer ... 

Myself and my developers have noticed that with our new 5.5 development Tomcats 
changes to JSPs now cause Tomcat to reload our web applications. 

This causes (because we're too keen to see changes) blank pages/broken 
responses and ThreadDeath occasionally when we put immediate requests in to the 
pages. 

It's not quite as nice during development to have to wait that extra short 
while for TC to restart the whole container because of a JSP change, and it 
makes me worry about patching production JSPs.

Is this expected behaviour? Perhaps the new JDT compiler? Can it be stopped 
without using reloadable=false? We don't use anti JAR locking either.

Cheers, Allistair

 -Original Message-
 From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 14 December 2004 15:52
 To: Allistair Crossley
 Subject: RE: Leaving Millennium, going on vacation...
 
 
 
 Thank you, and the same to you and your family -- enjoy the 
 holidays ;)
 
 Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:28 AM
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: RE: Leaving Millennium, going on vacation...
 
 Merry Christmas Yoav, all the best for the New Year and enjoy your
 holidays. I don't blame you leaving your laptop behind ;)
 
 See you in the New Year. Allistair.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 14 December 2004 15:20
  To: Tomcat Developers List
  Subject: Leaving Millennium, going on vacation...
 
 
 
  Hi,
  Tomorrow is my last day at Millennium, so this [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 address
  will become invalid.  I'm going on vacation for most of the rest of
  December, and then I'll be back in January (although we'll
  see how busy
  school will be.  This is just an FYI, I'll still be around 
 for a few
  more days before vacation, but after the 19th I'm out of the
  country and
  not taking my laptop with me...
 
  Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
 
 
 
 
 
  This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential
  business communication, and may contain information that is
  confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is
  intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed,
  and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by
  anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient,
  please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer
  system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
 
 
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Developers of QuickAddress Software
 a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential 
 business communication, and may contain information that is 
 confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is 
 intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, 
 and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
 anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, 
 please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer 
 system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?

2004-12-14 Thread Allistair Crossley
Remy,
 
I really have to bite my lip sometimes with your blunt replies.
 
The fact of the matter is that I am not stupid, nor do I have a vivid 
imagination. You may be a developer of Tomcat but that does not necessarily 
equate to you being right all the time about bugs, and I have seen several 
times where you are wrong, several of which have been things I have reported 
and one of which I fixed. Give me some credit please.
 
Now, the fact of the matter is, we have a situation where Tomcat *is* without a 
doubt reloading our web application on *all* developers' personal Tomcat 5.5.5 
instances. We are all working on different subsystems across the code base too 
and same behaviour. A very junior developer said to me this morning, this new 
Tomcat is a little temperamental isn't it?. Now this guy does not know much 
about how Tomcat works, but he is very aware of what a Tomcat looks like when 
reloading a web application, e.g a request goes in and we get broken response 
HTML coming back, and of course definate proof in the logs stating quite 
explicitly that the web application is being reloaded. My guess at JDT compiler 
was simply based on the fact that it is used for JSP compilation and is new. An 
assertion or guess that is not vivid imo.
 
So I appreciate you cannot reproduce it with maybe servlet-examples OK. But the 
issue *is not* my vivid imagination. So, I wonder how I can provide something 
that will make you believe it. I will try and get something together for you 
asap.
 
Cheers, Allistair

-Original Message- 
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tue 14/12/2004 17:07 
To: Tomcat Developers List 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?



Allistair Crossley wrote:

Myself and my developers have noticed that with our new 5.5 
development Tomcats changes to JSPs now cause Tomcat to reload our web 
applications.
 

I cannot reproduce this.

Is this expected behaviour? Perhaps the new JDT compiler? Can it be 
stopped without using reloadable=false? We don't use anti JAR locking either.
 

You have a vivid imagination. What else ?

Rmy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?

2004-12-14 Thread Allistair Crossley
I had a quick go at this like you probably did with something simple, and there 
is certainly no web application reload in this circumstance. 
 
The web application in question is configured with JNDI datasources and log4j. 
The architecture of the application uses Struts and Tiles for JSPs. I think I 
am going to have to try to take copy of the application and work it backwards 
to see where/what causes the Tomcat web app reload. 
 
We use Ant to build the web application. For development JSPs this is a simple 
copy to the web app folder. For classes, they are compiled. Static resources 
and config files are also copied. 
 
I had the issue in question all day today. All I was doing was making textual 
changes to a JSP. I used Ant to copy them across (which we have been doing 
since April 2004) and then made a request to a Struts action (which then return 
the JSP in question). A white page is shown (or partial HTML page). Looking in 
stdout, you can see the web application has been reinitialised. The Ant build 
output shows no compilation of classes, so the reloadable aspect of Tomcat 
should not in my view be triggered. 
 
Thinking about it harder, I can say with 85% surity that this started happening 
with around 5.5.4 (since I always upgrade our test server on the day of a new 
Tomcat release). 
 
I don't know what else to add really at this point. I will perform some further 
tests tomorrow to narrow it down if I can, but this is an issue with 
*something*, it's just finding out where. It could be as simple as Ant is 
touching class files when it should not (which it never used to so I doubt it) 
or it could be something in Tomcat but I would not know what/why.
 
Will let you know if I find any more hard links to what causes the issue.
 
Allistair.

-Original Message- 
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tue 14/12/2004 17:07 
To: Tomcat Developers List 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: JSP changes cause web app reload in 5.5?



Allistair Crossley wrote:

Myself and my developers have noticed that with our new 5.5 
development Tomcats changes to JSPs now cause Tomcat to reload our web 
applications.
 

I cannot reproduce this.

Is this expected behaviour? Perhaps the new JDT compiler? Can it be 
stopped without using reloadable=false? We don't use anti JAR locking either.
 

You have a vivid imagination. What else ?

Rmy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: JK 1.2.7 Problem?

2004-12-13 Thread Allistair Crossley
Copying in DEV on this JK issue/solution on Mladen's request. The release build 
worked fine.

Allistair.

 Mladen 

Whow!
Seems that the problem is caused by the fact that beta3 binaries
are compiled as 'debug' so tolower function is issuing an assertion.

I'll make a release build and sent it to your email directly.
Can you check the results with release build?

Regards,
Mladen.

-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley 
Sent: 14 December 2004 11:11
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK 1.2.7 Problem?


Here is the trace logging. IE just hangs for a long while and does not get 
anywhere. As soon as 1.2.6 is back in, it works again.

Cheers, Allistair.

[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1004): Using registry.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1006): Using log file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\logs\isapi.log.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1007): Using log level 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1008): Using extension uri /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1009): Using worker file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\workers.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1010): Using worker mount file 
d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\uriworkermap.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:1560] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1012): Using uri select 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1004): Using registry.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1006): Using log file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\logs\isapi.log.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1007): Using log level 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1008): Using extension uri /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1009): Using worker file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\workers.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1010): Using worker mount file 
d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\uriworkermap.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:48 2004] [3176:2132] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1012): Using uri select 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1004): Using registry.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1006): Using log file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\logs\isapi.log.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1007): Using log level 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1008): Using extension uri /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1009): Using worker file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\workers.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1010): Using worker mount file 
d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\uriworkermap.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1012): Using uri select 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1004): Using registry.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1006): Using log file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\logs\isapi.log.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1007): Using log level 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [trace] 
uri_worker_map_alloc::jk_uri_worker_map.c (192): enter
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1008): Using extension uri /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1009): Using worker file d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\workers.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [trace] 
uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (442): enter
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1010): Using worker mount file 
d:\jakarta-tomcat-jk\conf\uriworkermap.properties.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] 
uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (461): rule map size is 2
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:2160] [debug] init_jk::jk_isapi_plugin.c 
(1012): Using uri select 0.
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [trace] 
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (266): enter
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug] 
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (360): suffix rule /.do=ajp13 was added
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [trace] 
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (433): exit
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [trace] 
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (266): enter
[Tue Dec 14 11:06:50 2004] [3176:3356] [debug

RE: Leaving Millennium, going on vacation...

2004-12-13 Thread Allistair Crossley
Merry Christmas Yoav, all the best for the New Year and enjoy your holidays. I 
don't blame you leaving your laptop behind ;)

See you in the New Year. Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 14 December 2004 15:20
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Leaving Millennium, going on vacation...
 
 
 
 Hi,
 Tomorrow is my last day at Millennium, so this [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
 will become invalid.  I'm going on vacation for most of the rest of
 December, and then I'll be back in January (although we'll 
 see how busy
 school will be.  This is just an FYI, I'll still be around for a few
 more days before vacation, but after the 19th I'm out of the 
 country and
 not taking my laptop with me...
 
 Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
  
 
 
 
 
 This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential 
 business communication, and may contain information that is 
 confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is 
 intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, 
 and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
 anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, 
 please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer 
 system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Releasing JK1.2.7

2004-12-10 Thread Allistair Crossley
Have installed beta-2 on our test Windows 2000 server + Tomcat 5.5.5 + IIS 5. 
All our features are working.

The system allows file uploads into a content management system. With JK2 we 
have periodically had errors related to other Bugzilla IDs with file upload 
(stream terminated unexpectedly). We had this on production this morning with 
an Excel file. Tested the same file upload to test server and it was OK. Cannot 
guarantee this was due to 1.2.7 OR whether it was a server/network related 
issue with production, but 1.2.7 is having no issues with all context calls 
including *.do and *.jsp mappings (Struts calls, JSP calls) nor with file 
uploads.

Cheers, Allistair,


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[OT} RE: How to add variables into WEB-INF/web.xml or META-INF/*.* ?

2004-12-09 Thread Allistair Crossley
go google on this ... and do not use the tomcat-dev list, use tomcat-user (but 
not for these questions).

context-param

servletContext.getInitParameter

Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ilkka Heinonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 09 December 2004 09:41
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: How to add variables into WEB-INF/web.xml or META-INF/*.* ?
 
 
 Hello everyone.
 
  
 
 I should want to add variables like ODBC name into
 %Tomcat-webapps%/WEB_INF/web.xml. How can you do it? How do 
 you use it in
 java code (jsp, servlet, basic class).
 
  
 
 Some examples that I need to make parametric: 
 
 -JDBC/ODBC name
 
 -Official Project name
 
 -Project description
 
 -Project logo location
 
  
 
 Do you have the way how to make this true?
 
 How u can use variable values in java code?
 
  
 
  
 
 Thanks in advance
 
  -Ilkka Heinonen-
 
 
 
  
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [ANN] Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.7-beta-2 released

2004-12-08 Thread Allistair Crossley
i agree. i would have tested the new 1.2.7 for iis (if any changes are there of 
course) on our test server, but do not have VC to compile the source. binaries 
should be available for betas imo. we cover most things with the jk iis 
connector, e.g intergrated auth, normal browsing and lots of file uploads 
through to our CMS. could be beneficial for the jk team.

Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dominik Drzewiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 December 2004 10:52
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [ANN] Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.7-beta-2 released
 
 
  The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate 
  availability of Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.7-beta-2.
  The release contains a fixes to few compilation problems detected
  with JK-1.2.7-beta version. This release also introduces a new
  domain concept clustering support. See Bugzilla #32317 for details.
 
 It'd be nice to see some binaries. 
 I know that building it is a snap on *almost* all platforms.
 But there is also this Windows O/S, ya know, for which 
 building requires 
 *non free* M$ VC 6.0.
 
  
  We expect it to be ratified as a Stable release when the vote takes 
  place in the next two weeks.
  
 I suppose that providing binaries only for those interested 
 (subscribed to 
 tomcat-dev) would give jk better testing before it goes GA.
 I suggest that the process should be similar to the tomcat 
 release cycle, 
 which means that the announcement on tomcat-dev is 
 accompanied by providing 
 sources/binaries in a well known place 
 http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/. Then the 
 testing begins, 
 which is followed by voting and more public announcement afterwards.
 
 cheers
 /dd
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [ANN] Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.7-beta-2 released

2004-12-08 Thread Allistair Crossley
Cool.

I've just gone to the Tomcat 5.5 docs and the link is broken for JK 1.2 

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jk-1.2/

If you have the new link, I will patch the file.

Cheers, Ali.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 December 2004 14:34
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: [ANN] Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.7-beta-2 released
 
 
 Allistair Crossley wrote:
  i agree. i would have tested the new 1.2.7 for iis (if any 
 changes are there of course) on our test server, but do not 
 have VC to compile the source. binaries should be available 
 for betas imo. we cover most things with the jk iis 
 connector, e.g intergrated auth, normal browsing and lots of 
 file uploads through to our CMS. could be beneficial for the jk team.
 
 
 The binaries for WIN32 are at usual place:
 http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binari
 es/win32/
 
 We need as much testing as possible using newly added directives
 (see the docs).
 
 Thanks evryone that will make the testings. It'll surely led to a
 more stable 1.2.8 release.
 
 Regards,
 
 Mladen.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat 5.0.30 today...

2004-12-03 Thread Allistair Crossley
yeah where _did_ 5.5.5 go ;) :) were you out on the razz yoav?

 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 03 December 2004 15:08
 To: Tomcat Developers List
 Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.30 today...
 
 
 LOL, man I couldn't help laughing.
 
 you guys are slacking off!!   just kidding.
 
 peter
 
 
 On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:04:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Shapira, Yoav wrote:
  
  Bah ;)  I posted a note to tomcat-user telling people of 
 the fix, which
  is just a configuration.  The next step would be to post 
 the amended
  configuration file itself (struts-config.xml) on the 
 download pages, and
  I'll do that today assuming no one objects.  But a whole 
 new release for
  this -- I hadn't planned on it, don't feel like it at the moment.
  
  I've been there already ;)
  
  Rémy
  
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32381] - Couldn't expand/collapse tree branches using Tomcat Administration Tool

2004-12-03 Thread Allistair Crossley
i notice in the 5.0.30 code, this bug may also exist since the web.xml is 2.4, 
although I have not tested. was this patched to the 5.0.30 also?

cheers, Allistair.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 01 December 2004 22:42
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32381] - Couldn't expand/collapse tree
 branches using Tomcat Administration Tool
 
 
 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
 RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32381.
 ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
 INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
 
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32381
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
 
What|Removed |Added
 --
 --
  Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
  Resolution||FIXED
 
 
 
 
 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 2004-12-01 23:42 ---
 this bug was a result of moving to the 2.4 spec. the 
 placeholder used in the 
 tree control tag was ${name} which tomcat will have tried to 
 evaluate as a 
 page scoped expression language variable (which does not 
 exist of course as 
 this is not the intention).
 
 i have provided patches for the affected JSP and Java files 
 that removes the 
 dollar but leaves the braces so it still looks like a placeholder.
 
 i have also grepped all files across the admin webapp to 
 ensure there are no 
 more similar bugs involving EL type syntax placeholders and 
 there are not 
 (only ${node} but this is in comments only and is not present 
 in code anywhere.
 
 i have compiled and tested with the latest HEAD and the node 
 collapse works 
 ok. hope this makes it for 5.5.5 tomorrow.
 
 cheers :)
 
 -- 
 Configure bugmail: 
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]