Re: Somebody get me off this List PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2001-07-05 Thread Earl Stutes

On 05 Jul 2001 18:10:42 +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> "Swart, James (Jim) ** CTR **" wrote:
> > 
> > why is it everyone has such a hard time getting off this list?  Someone put
> > me in charge of getting people off the jarkata maillists, I'll make sure
> > it's done to ensure these floods of "get me off here" is done... Sound good?
> 
> Can't it be automated? What are the lists running on?

It is automated. I have had no trouble getting off the list and back on several times.
You do have to follow the rules and respond to the email confirmation of the 
unsubscribe 
request.

=eas=




j2sdk-1.4beta

2001-05-25 Thread Earl . Stutes

I have tomcat-3.2.2-b5/apache_1.3.19 running in the j2sdk-1.4 beta
environment. I have not tested SSL/TLS yet, but plan to do that shortly.

=eas=




Re: 'Just say no to JSP'

2001-04-06 Thread Earl . Stutes

Why has the tomcat-dev list become a Velocity advocacy list??
Isn't the purpose of this list supposed to be for communation between
Tomcat developers?  Is velocity recruiting or something?

=eas=
On  6 Apr, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 20:57
> 
>  
>> Arguing what is the best programming language or if interpreted is
>> better than compiled is mostly a waste of time. Some people will
>> prefer to learn VTL, other will prefer to use Java, other will like
>> the XML-like syntax.
> 
> Sure. And compiled is still an open option for Velocity.
> 
> 
>> I think code generation is a good thing, ...
> 
> Sure, some template use problems could be easier to debug if there is
> some intermediate source code and a good debugger.
> 
>> ... and I prefer using Jsp with Java
>> for quick prototypes and taglibs when possible.
> 
>




Re: "Just say no to JSP" Re: [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source code by URL trickery]

2001-04-04 Thread Earl . Stutes

An alternative view!

On  4 Apr, Brad Cox wrote:
> At 11:24 AM -0700 04/04/2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
>>I love the article title:
>>"Just say no to JSP"
I am really sorry to see folks coming on this list, and also publishing
to the general web articles deriding JSP and tomcat in particular. I
have apache-1.3.19 with tomcat-3.2.2b running behind it just fine using
mod_jk. The application running is an apache soap server This is on a
redhat 6.2 box. I also have tomcat-4.0 running on port 7070 at the same
time where I am doing development on a secure email application. I have
moved my email app back and forth between TC3.2 and TC4.0 with no
problems. I just drop the war file in the webapps directory and tomcat
does the rest.

I do have all the latest jar files from SUNW, and jakarta-apache. So I
don't know what the problems could be. My only complaints would be not
enough debug tools around to be able to single step through new code
when you are having problems, but I consider that minor at this point,
given where the tomcat development cycle is.

I think the tomcat developers for all their good work.

=eas=
-- 
 .
 |\
 | \  
 |  \
 |  -\
 |\  
 |  *  \ +---+
 |  \| I'd Rather Be Sailing A Laser |
 | --\   +---+
 | 83345  \  
 | \ 
 |   ---\
 |   \  
 |\[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |-O---\
 |/w\-|
..|=|
 \   I| |
~~~




Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

2001-04-02 Thread Earl . Stutes

On  2 Apr, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> The bad news came from mod_webapp which didn't compile at all on
> my gcc (many bad structs declarations, missing includes in wa.h)
> 
> Did Pier has commited all his change to cvs before beta2 was closed ?
> 
I have seen this for quite a while(several weeks), and just thought it
was my copy of the CVS. 


=eas=





Re: [FOLLOWUP] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date?

2001-03-28 Thread Earl . Stutes

On 27 Mar, George C. Hawkins wrote:
> 
> PS does anyone else feel that a once a week status report would be a
> really good idea - nothing too big just a few lines from Craig say on
> what he felt had been achieved in the last week, general feelings on
> progess and non-binding comments on possible future beta/milestone
> dates? This would keep nuisances like me from posting this kind of
> thing and give everyone a feeling they knew how and where things were
> going.

You sound like a manager talking. I have lots of status from Craig. I
see his CVS updates and all of the conversations he is involved on this
list. To specifically write a status report would seem to me to be a bit
much to ask. Further I can see Tomcat improve with my nightly update of
the cvs tree.

-1 on status reports

=eas=