DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28272] New: - Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war file

2004-04-07 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28272

Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war file

   Summary: Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war
file
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.20
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Other
 Component: Webapps:Manager
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Intuitively, I would expect that if I only use the war parameter (without
config and path), and my application contains META-INF/context.xml, then Tomcat
should consider this context.xml file, including the 'path' attribute specified
in it. 
 Also, the docBase attribute should not be needed in this case (as it is implied
by the location of context.xml), but the manager-howto.html file specifies it as
mandatory. Shouldn't docBase be optional? Thanks.

 One of the important gains should be the possibility to use relative path in
the context.xml and thus be able to version control the file.

 There were some comments about this in a separate issue
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216), but I decided to open
this one instead, so that we don't mix things together.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Autoreply: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28272] New: - Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war file

2004-04-07 Thread DirectXtras 
Hello,

Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.

Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp

We apology for the inconvenience.

Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras - Xtra Power for Director and Authorware -
  http://www.directxtras.com
Sites with something to say - http://www.SpeaksForItself.com
-


Your message reads:

Received: from mail.apache.org (unverified [208.185.179.12]) by mail2.intermedia.net
 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:09:57 -0700
Received: (qmail 89939 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2004 04:09:41 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" 
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 89924 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 04:09:40 -
Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 04:09:40 -
Received: (qmail 5940 invoked by uid 50); 8 Apr 2004 04:10:33 -
Date: 8 Apr 2004 04:10:33 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28272] New:  - 
Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war file
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28272>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28272

Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war file

   Summary: Deploy manager command should use context.xml from war
file
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.20
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Other
 Component: Webapps:Manager
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Intuitively, I would expect that if I only use the war parameter (without
config and path), and my application contains META-INF/context.xml, then Tomcat
should consider this context.xml file, including the 'path' attribute specified
in it. 
 Also, the docBase attribute should not be needed in this case (as it is implied
by the location of context.xml), but the manager-howto.html file specifies it as
mandatory. Shouldn't docBase be optional? Thanks.

 One of the important gains should be the possibility to use relative path in
the context.xml and thus be able to version control the file.

 There were some comments about this in a separate issue
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27216), but I decided to open
this one instead, so that we don't mix things together.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]