DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Version|Nightly Build |5.0.3 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-24 22:50 --- Improvements have been made to Tomcat 5.0 deployer, which should address this RFE. This will be in Tomcat 5.0.4. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-15 13:56 --- Dear Remy You have my full sympathy about this problem, but there is a lot of confusion occurring. You're being perfectly reasonable both in pointing out that this isn't a bug at all, but the designed behavior, and in suggesting that bug reporters instead submit a patch to change the behavior. The problem is that many people who are experiencing this bug, and this applies to me, are not technically adept enough to propose such a change - is there any chance that you could revisit the stated design and , or would this then contravene a specification? What I believe people want or need is to be able to start Tomcat *with* a context (e.g. MyApp) defined in server.xml, and with a MyApp.war file in place, but *without* the exploded MyApp webapp directory; in this scenario it would be most excellent if Tomcat unpacked the WAR before alternatively discovering the absence of the declared context. What are your thoughts on this suggestion? TIA Kind regards Tim Cooke P.S. At present I run Tomcat 4.0.1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-06 01:07 --- *** Bug 6739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-23 15:01 --- *** Bug 8418 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-12 23:05 --- *** Bug 8036 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-22 18:36 --- I have also observed this behavior. This probably could be considered more of a bug in the documentation than the code. The 4.0 on-line docs state you can set (the unpackWARS attribute of a Host element) to true if you want web applications that are deployed into this virtual host from a Web Application Archive (WAR) file to be unpacked into a disk directory structure. They also state that (y)ou can nest one or more Context elements inside this Host element, each representing a different web application associated with this virtual host. As to Context, (t)he Context element represents a web application, which is run within a particular virtual host. Each web application is based on a Web Application Archive (WAR) file, or a corresponding directory containing the corresponding unpacked contents..., and that(e)ach (Context element) MUST have a unique context path, which is defined by the path attribute. The docs don't say that before Tomcat unpacks any warfiles, it will first attempt to verify the context path of a Context element by checking for a web.xml file in the corresponding webapp WEB-INF directories. It also doesn't state that if it can't find the web.xml file in the context path directory referenced by the Context element, it will shut down. If anything, the desired behavior should be the opposite: unpack the warfiles, then check the Context elements in server.xml against the appropriate web.xml. That might be a little less irritating than not. PaulGarvie -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-06 23:30 --- *** Bug 6941 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-16 03:21 --- [Note that this is still the behaviour in 4.0.2]. I must concur with the reporter. The documentation at tomcat- docs/config/host.html leads one to believe that the auto-deployment of the application is orthogonal to the automatic creation of the context if it is not supplied. A work-around we have experimented with is to choose a path that is different from the docBase (given that documents.war is in the webapps directory): Context path=/docs docBase=documents/ At first this seems to work but there are two problems 1. This actually deploys as two applications, each using the same docBase. Once at /docs and the other at /documents. 2. There is a race condition. If the /doc context is started before the documents.war is deployed it will not be found until tomcat is restarted. It does not seem unreasonable to want to have a war file auto deploy and specify a context in the server.xml file. I may have an application for which I wish to create files in the applications docBase and want to add parameters to the context (e.g. realm. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Critical|Enhancement Priority|Other |Medium Version|4.0.1 Final |4.0.2 Final --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-16 07:04 --- As I stated quite a few times, this bug will not be fixed. If you are not satisfied with the current behavior, the best way to fix it is to submit a patch, and we'll consider it for inclusion. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-01-02 06:36 --- *** Bug 5600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-28 09:10 --- *** Bug 5105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-27 11:55 --- *** Bug 5105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-16 00:38 --- Yeah, it does work ONLY if the webapp is in extracted form under webapp/lexis... BUT the examples webapp is now NOT distributed as a war-file. It was so distributed in earlier Versions. Tomcat 3.2.1 had some war-files: admin, examples, ROOT and test. With Catalina these webapps aren't distibuted anymore as war-files. May this be because of this problem, or should we developers avoid using war- files to distribute our applications/updates? Please take a closer look to the following: == WHEN I DO NOT DEFINE A CONTEXT FOR lexis, BUT A DefaultContext, Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true Valve className=org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn debug=0/ Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs prefix=localhost_access_log. suffix=.txt pattern=common/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.SystemOutLogger/ DefaultContext reloadable=true Manager className=org.apache.catalina.session.PersistentManager debug=4 saveOnRestart=false maxActiveSessions=-1 minIdleSwap=-1 maxIdleSwap=-1 maxIdleBackup=-1 Store className=org.apache.catalina.session.FileStore/ /Manager /DefaultContext . THE WAR FILE webapps/lexis.war WILL BE EXPANDED AND DEPLOYED. BUT THIS DEFAULT CONTEXT WILL JUST BE IGNORED (saveOnRestart=false). I AM ALSO NOT ABLE TO DEFINE APPLICATION PARAMETERS: == Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 StandardHost[localhost]: Installing web application at context path /lexis from URL jar:file:D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis.war!/ WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploying class repositories to work directory D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\work\localhost\lexis WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/activation.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\activation.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/crimson.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\crimson.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/jaxp.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5 \tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\jaxp.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/lexis.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\lexis.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/log4j.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\log4j.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/mail.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5 \tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\mail.jar WebappLoader[/lexis]: Deploy JAR /WEB-INF/lib/struts.jar to D:\Programme\JBuilder5\tomcat\webapps\lexis\WEB-INF\lib\struts.jar StandardManager[/lexis]: Seeding random number generator class java.security.SecureRandom StandardManager[/lexis]: Seeding of random number generator has been completed StandardManager[/lexis] IOException while loading persisted sessions: java.io.WriteAbortedException: Writing aborted by exception; java.io.NotSerializableExce ion: org.apache.log4j.Category java.io.WriteAbortedException: Writing aborted by exception; java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.log4j.Category at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:445) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.inputClassFields (ObjectInputStream.java:2263) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject (ObjectInputStream.java:519) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.inputObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1412) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:386) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.inputClassFields (ObjectInputStream.java:2263) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject (ObjectInputStream.java:519) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.inputObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1412) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:386) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:236) at org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.readObject
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-16 02:08 --- I have test the DefaultContext with nightly 11/12/2001 build and it works with Parameter and Env -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-15 13:34 --- We had already tried your proposal, but it does not work. We have not changed the parameter unpackWARs (which -I think- is responsible for the unpacking), but Tomcat does not unpack the webapp: Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true Is there any other way to let Tomcat extract the WAR file? We _must_ define a context for lexis, to do the folowing: 1) avoid the sessions to be persisted and reloaded (saveOnRestart=false) when Tomcat is shut down and restarted (Just because we do not only use struts: we also use log4j, which is not Serializable, and at higher levels the PersistentManager declarations seem not to work) 2) to log4j the lexis application to a specific file/directory 3) to use application parameters ((Without defining a context for the webapp lexis Tomcat DOES extract the WAR file. Only when I __define__ a context it DOES NOT!!)) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-15 14:14 --- What I suggest doing works for me. That's how the examples webapp is declared (and it uses a lot of custom parameters). The unpackWARs attribute is used only when auto-deploying webapps, not when explicitely declaring contexts. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829 Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-13 10:57 --- When you use that kind of declaration (referencing a WAR), the webapp is run without unpacking the WAR (although the JARs and the classes will be extracted to a temporary location). Struts should run in that mode, but webapps which require filesystem access will not (getRealPath() will return null, and direct filesystem access to the webapp's resources will obviously fail). If you don't want that to happen, you can let Tomcat extract the WAR, and then declare your context as Context path=/lexis docBase=lexis. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
