DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8566] - Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566 Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-21 22:35 --- *** Bug 21782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8566] - Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566 Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-30 12:07 --- *** Bug 9754 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8566] - Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8566 Filter using ServletRequestWrapper breaks RequestDispatcher.forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-26 20:57 --- When processing a RequestDispatcher.forward() or RequestDispatcher.include() call, the container is required to ensure that any wrapped request (or response) provided by the calling servlet is the very same instance that is handed to the calling servlet (Servlet 2.3 Spec, Section 6.2.2, last paragraph). Therefore, it is not legal to implement request dispatcher processing by wrapping the request provided by the calling servlet. A consequence of this is that your wrapper class *must* delegate calls like getServletPath() to its superclass in order to see the modified values set by the container -- which are conceptually performed on the underlying real request object itself. If your application fails to do this, then it is the application's problem that the wrong answer is returned -- just as it would be if you overrode getServletPath() and always returned a null value, or some constant String. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
