Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk
-- Forwarded Message From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Poor documentation for jk Hi Webmaster, I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk. There is up to date documentation for both jk and jk2 : JK: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/doc/ JK2: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/ The documentation is regenerated each day from cvs contents. Connector is also directly reference in tomcat 4.1 online doc : http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated documentation. Did you ever tried to search on user mailing lists ? Sometimes I wonder why we make documentations - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Poor documentation for jk
Hi, The doc could be found at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html Cheers Jean-frederic Pier Fumagalli wrote: Not acked -- Forwarded Message From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Poor documentation for jk Hi Webmaster, I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk. jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated documentation. Thank you and best regards, Mark Nye -- End of Forwarded Message - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Poor documentation for jk
Not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Poor documentation for jk > > Hi Webmaster, > I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the > jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly skrewd. It's saying to run > scripts that don't exist and basically making it impossible to use jk. > jserv is what we now use and i guess have to continue to use. I would > like to see apache remain #1 but that will not be the case with outdated > documentation. > > Thank you and best regards, > Mark Nye > > > -- End of Forwarded Message - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
