Re: Facades for OS and W

2004-04-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
Bug 28347 had good entertaining value
you are so humble ;-)

it is an interesting and fully valid test case to test our systems under
extreme concurrency by one user, he he he
Of course not: it generates more load on the client, and if you have the 
two of them on the same computer, well ...

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Facades for OS and W

2004-04-13 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
>Bug 28347 had good entertaining value

you are so humble ;-)

it is an interesting and fully valid test case to test our systems under
extreme concurrency by one user, he he he

Filip


-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:34 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Facades for OS and W


Hi,

Bug 28347 had good entertaining value. Since I had time to spare
yesterday afternoon, I investigated it a little (which was rather
interesting). After going nuts for a while, I determined the problem is
simply that the output stream and writer need facades (maybe because the
API used have some threading issues), which I propose adding in
sercurity manager enabled mode (as usual).

I'll also try doing the cookie optimization I talked about earlier.

Rémy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.654 / Virus Database: 419 - Release Date: 4/6/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.654 / Virus Database: 419 - Release Date: 4/6/2004


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]