He means please try again with the latest version from CVS, i.e. HEAD. Jason
-----Original Message----- From: LAGALISSE Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/24/2003 7:29 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Subject: RE : lb_factor defect. We're using the 1.2.2 release. Could you explain me what you mean by ' Could you retry with HEAD ?' Thanks for your help. Eric LAGALISSE -----Message d'origine----- De : Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:11 À : Tomcat Developers List Objet : Re: lb_factor defect. LAGALISSE Eric wrote: > After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we > noticed that if we define workers.properties as follow the load > balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio. > > For example if we stress with 100 users, 80 are routed to the first > tomcat server declared in workers.properties and 20 are routed to the > second. > > > > After a look at the source code i supposed that if lb_factor is similar > for all load_balanced worker, load should be equal on all. But not. > Which release of mod_jk are you using ? jk 1.2.2 is the latest release and there is some fixes in HEAD (which will became shortly 1.2.3). Could you retry with HEAD ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
