Guenter Knauf wrote:

Hi all,
before this gets again forgotten, here's the reminder:

should we change the Win32 binary extention of the Apache modules to .so instead of .dll ??

Apache changed that with version 1.3.15 already; and I got a lot of questions about 
that at this time...
now the questions are the other turn: why is mod_jk/mod_jk2 a dll? where do I have to 
put it in?

so I'm +1 for changing to .so because I think then the chances are better that the user puts the module into the Apache modules folder...

please vote for this:

[+/-]1 for changing to .so

+0 for me


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to