Re: [Tomcat 4.1] Proposed Slight Binary Distribution Rearrangement
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Jeff Turner wrote: > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 19:41:47 +1000 > From: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tomcat 4.1] Proposed Slight Binary Distribution > Rearrangement > > How about naming it "common" instead of "shared", to match Tomcat 3.3? > There is already a "common" directory, whose "common/classes" and "common/lib" subdirectories are added to the "Common" class loader. In fact, it is *this* pattern that I want "shared" to match :-). > --Jeff > Craig
Re: [Tomcat 4.1] Proposed Slight Binary Distribution Rearrangement
Jeff Turner wrote: > > How about naming it "common" instead of "shared", to match Tomcat 3.3? There is already a common/lib in TC4.0 > > --Jeff > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:54:54PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > I'd like to propose a small change in the binary distribution layout for > > the next version of Tomcat (4.1). It's probably not a good idea to > > introduce this in a 4.0.1 maintenance update, though. > > > > Currently, the "Shared" class loader is set up based on unpacked classes > > in the "$CATALINA_HOME/classes" directory plus JAR files in the > > "$CATALINA_HOME/lib" directory. I would like to suggest that we change > > this to "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/classes" and "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib" > > instead, to have the directory names be more consistent with the class > > loader names. > > > > Anybody have any comments or thoughts on this? > > > > Craig > >
Re: [Tomcat 4.1] Proposed Slight Binary Distribution Rearrangement
How about naming it "common" instead of "shared", to match Tomcat 3.3? --Jeff On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:54:54PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I'd like to propose a small change in the binary distribution layout for > the next version of Tomcat (4.1). It's probably not a good idea to > introduce this in a 4.0.1 maintenance update, though. > > Currently, the "Shared" class loader is set up based on unpacked classes > in the "$CATALINA_HOME/classes" directory plus JAR files in the > "$CATALINA_HOME/lib" directory. I would like to suggest that we change > this to "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/classes" and "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib" > instead, to have the directory names be more consistent with the class > loader names. > > Anybody have any comments or thoughts on this? > > Craig >
Re: [Tomcat 4.1] Proposed Slight Binary Distribution Rearrangement
> I'd like to propose a small change in the binary distribution layout for > the next version of Tomcat (4.1). It's probably not a good idea to > introduce this in a 4.0.1 maintenance update, though. > > Currently, the "Shared" class loader is set up based on unpacked classes > in the "$CATALINA_HOME/classes" directory plus JAR files in the > "$CATALINA_HOME/lib" directory. I would like to suggest that we change > this to "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/classes" and "$CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib" > instead, to have the directory names be more consistent with the class > loader names. > > Anybody have any comments or thoughts on this? +1, if 4.1 happens in the near future. Otherwise, it's a small change, and it would probably avoid some confusion, so we should roll it back sooner. Remy
