RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[GOMEZ Henri]

>> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:

+1 (rpms)

>> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
>> 
>> +1 [X] Yes
>> -1 [ ] No
>> 

I'd like to have Coyote source instead 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[costinm]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > > below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will
> > > appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.
> >
> > +1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector.
> 
> I didn't propose to do that, because, although the new connector appears
> robust and stable, there's the risk that it would have new bugs, or, even
> worse, (re)introduce some security problems. I took great care of adding all
> the URL normalization code from the old connector, so that it shouldn't
> happen, but I'd say it would still be a significant risk to make it the
> default without some extensive beta period. Since there will be such a beta
> period for 4.1, I think it is a lot safer to postpone making it the default
> for now.
> 
> Comments ?

The code is clearly better and cleaner than the old connector, that means 
more maintainable and easier to fix and review - if there's any problem. 
And cleaner code is usually more secure :-)

But I agree it's safer to do it gradually, however I hope 4.0.5 and 
3.3.2 will have coyote as the default connector.


Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> > below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will
> > appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.
>
> +1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector.

I didn't propose to do that, because, although the new connector appears
robust and stable, there's the risk that it would have new bugs, or, even
worse, (re)introduce some security problems. I took great care of adding all
the URL normalization code from the old connector, so that it shouldn't
happen, but I'd say it would still be a significant risk to make it the
default without some extensive beta period. Since there will be such a beta
period for 4.1, I think it is a lot safer to postpone making it the default
for now.

Comments ?

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Manveen Kaur]

> I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the
> bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors.
>
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [*] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
>
> 
>
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [*] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Kin-Man Chung]

+1 on both.

> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:25:50 -0800
> From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-priority: Normal
> Delivered-to: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> X-Spam-Rating: localhost.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
> List-Post: 
> List-Subscribe: 
> List-Unsubscribe: 
> List-Help: 
> List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" 
> 
> I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days (friday at the
> earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will include bugfixes
> (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as well as the
> inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results of the vote
> below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will
> appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.
> 
> I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the
> bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors.
> 
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [ ] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 
> My vote is +1 for both.
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Amy Roh]

> 
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [X] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [X] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 
> My vote is +1 for both.
> 
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[costinm]

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will
> appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.

+1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector.


> I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the
> bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors.
> 
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [X] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [X] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 

Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Remy Maucherat]

> I have to commit and retest things (PR6982) and properties problems with
Coyote
> as soon as I am thru +1 for both.

Ok. Properties means message strings ? If so, yes, I'd say it needs to be
improved.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[jean-frederic clere]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days (friday at the
> earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will include bugfixes
> (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as well as the
> inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results of the vote
> below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will
> appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.
> 
> I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the
> bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors.
> 
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [ ] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 
> My vote is +1 for both.
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 

I have to commit and retest things (PR6982) and properties problems with Coyote 
as soon as I am thru +1 for both.

Cheers

Jean-frederic


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Larry Isaacs]

> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:26 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
> 
> 
> I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days 
> (friday at the
> earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will 
> include bugfixes
> (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as 
> well as the
> inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results 
> of the vote
> below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by 
> default, but will
> appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file.
> 
> I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to 
> pick up the
> bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors.
> 
> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [X] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [X] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 
> My vote is +1 for both.
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Bill Barker]

> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [X] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [X] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release

[Kevin Seguin]

> Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release:
> 
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> 
> 

+0


> Inclusion of the Coyote binaries:
> 
> +1 [ ] Yes
> -1 [ ] No
> 
> 

+1

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: