Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17762] - JNI problems

[Henri Gomez]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762

JNI problems

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Connector:AJP   |Native:JK
Summary||JNI problems


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-24 11:58 ---
I think people should just avoid JNI for now. It doesn't give any performance
boost anyway.
Ok, I'll add a note in jk2 release, but I'd like to see fixed the misc 
problems with others Apache 2.0 modules.

Just send a request in httpd-dev list

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17762] - JNI problems

[Remy Maucherat]

Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762

JNI problems

--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-24 11:58 
---
I think people should just avoid JNI for now. It doesn't give any 
performance
boost anyway.


Ok, I'll add a note in jk2 release, but I'd like to see fixed the misc 
problems with others Apache 2.0 modules.
About the no performance boost, that's my measurement (it's a bit faster 
than a socket with IIS, but slower than that on Linux with Apache 2). 
Costin was a bit suspicious, but I couldn't improve the results.

I think the manifests of the JARs need updates to fix the issues.

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]