RE: Tomcat, IIS and virtual hosts
I didn't spend too long on this, as we only needed the vhosts as a stop-gap solution, and only needed three at that, but the only way I found to do it was to have vhosts defined in both Apache and Tomcat. Apache's vhosting knows the difference for the static pages, and any .jsps/servlets for *any* of the servers are handed off to Tomcat without vhosting. Tomcat then knows the correct vhost as well, and serves the relevant jsp. I forget which (but I believe Apache) complained about the mod_jk config appearing within a vhost definition. I've no idea about IIS unfortunately - I only use real web-servers! The rest of the information you need is in the docs, and you should be able to work it out yourself. There may be a better way to do it, but I didn't have the time to find it. Hope this helps, Duncan. P.S. I can probably dig the old config files out if you need them, but I don't have them to hand at the mo. -Original Message- From: Brian Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2001 08:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat, IIS and virtual hosts Apache is a much better solution for virtual hosts than IIS He's using IIS and I'm using Apache. What we have in common is that we're both after examples of setting up Tomcat to work with virtual hosts. I'm sorry if that was not clear. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ This message contains information which may be privileged and confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone and return or destroy the original message. Sopheon and its officers are not responsible for any statements or material in this e-mail and in any attachment to it which might give rise to any criminal or civil claim.
RE: Why Use apache
I would suggest that Apache is also more secure - it's been around longer, and has had more development, thus has had longer to mature. If you hide Tomcat behind Apache, then any bugs that may appear in Tomcat's URL parsing (for example) are less of a worry. Duncan. -Original Message- From: David M. Rosner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2001 16:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why Use apache If I have all my static html and graphics loading off of other servers, is there any reason to use Apache with Tomcat? Is the combination more stable or is performance better with both running? thanks -dave At 11:00 AM 5/2/2001, Ronan Derby wrote: tomcat isn't as good as apache at serving static html files and images. also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi scripts and so on. -Original Message- From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why Use apache Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? Thanks Dallas Skinner This message contains information which may be privileged and confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone and return or destroy the original message. Sopheon and its officers are not responsible for any statements or material in this e-mail and in any attachment to it which might give rise to any criminal or civil claim.
RE: Cache problem with IE
I'm sure someone will jump on this from a great height if I'm wrong, but I
seem to recall that the cache settings are for intermediate caches - not the
browser. The browser can cache pages as it sees fit - provided that it
checks to see if they've been updated, but the cache control settings are
there to stop intermediate caches from falsely reporting a page as not
having changed.
Duncan.
-Original Message-
From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 March 2001 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cache problem with IE
Hi,
with the code below I can get netscape not to cache a jsp page but it
does not work with Internet-Explorer.
Does anybody know why?
response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache");
response.setHeader("Pragma", "no-cache");\
Zsolt
--
Zsolt Koppany
Intland GmbH www.intland.com
Schulze-Delitzsch-Strasse 16
D-70565 Stuttgart
Tel: +49-711-7871080 Fax: +49-711-7871017
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message contains information which may be privileged
and confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail, facsimile, or telephone and return or destroy the
original message. Sopheon and its officers are not responsible
for any statements or material in this e-mail and in any attachment
to it which might give rise to any criminal or civil claim.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jasper losing classpath?!?
Hi all, I've been merrily using Tomcat for some time now (v3.2.1) and have just come accross a rather bizarre one... Jasper seems to 'forget' the classpath after a while and refuses to compile new JSPs. All is well after startup, things run smoothly for an hour or two, and Tomcat will continue to serve already compiled JSPs. However, if I haven't used a given JSP after a couple of hours (not sure of a specific time) it will not compile. Jasper throws a 'Class not Found' JasperException and that's it. If Tomcat is restarted the same JSP will compile and run quite happily. Is this a known problem with Jasper, or am I just doing something really dumb with the config. It's not a major problem, as I should think that the production box can be 'pre-hit' to compile all the JSPs beforehand, and is unlikely to be updated often enough to warrant dynamic recompilation, but it'd be nice to know. Cheers, Duncan. This message contains information which may be privileged and confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone and return or destroy the original message. Sopheon and its officers are not responsible for any statements or material in this e-mail and in any attachment to it which might give rise to any criminal or civil claim. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
