request for mod_jk2.dll for 2.0.39

2002-11-14 Thread Ming Fai
hi,

for some reasons, I have to use Apache 2.0.39. However, I can't seem to find
the JK2 DLL for 2.0.39, (mod_jk2.dll for 2.0.39 or mod_jk2-2.0.39.dll,
whatever name as long as it works) the one in the apache binary download
site is for 2.0.43 and the nightly build obviously won't work for me as
well. Does anybody has that file and can send to me via email?

thx and regards,
mingfai


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




Startup script to record pid

2002-03-29 Thread Ming Fai

I use Tomcat 4.03 on Linux, and use mod_jk to balance loading between
multiple Tomcat instance. How do I write a startup shell script to record
the PID of each started instance?

regards,
mingfai


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Jetty .vs. tomcat

2002-02-28 Thread Ming Fai

hi Steve,

I'm a Tomcat user. from what I read on the web, I believe Jetty does
outperform Tomcat significantly in static pages and also outperform Tomcat
to a unknown degree in dynamic pages. so, why i still choose Tomcat?

My main consideration is in scalability. Multiple instance of Tomcat can be
run and load balanced with Apache and mod_jk. I believe it can achieve a
very high scalability in handling simultanceous requests. Other
considerations are: good integration with other Apache and commercial
products, better support (i personally think the 'support' from Apache group
is better than other open src groups), full implementation of JCP
specification etc.

And Tomcat should not be used together with Apache if there is heavy loading
of static pages.

Other than Tomcat and Jetty, Resin is also quite famous. And there are other
commercial choice like WebLogic, JRun and Orion.  You should make decision
base on your need.

In my opinion, if your site is small in scale, and requires a very good
response time, then Jetty or Resin are your choice. Otherwise, Tomcat is a
good choice in general and it is a proven product. It occupies about 50% of
the servlet engine market as of mid 2001.
(http://www.devx.com/judgingjava/articles/sixyears/printable/sixyearsp2.asp#
fig7)

Any comment are welcome!

Regards,
mingfai






 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Jetty .vs. tomcat



   How will you compare jetty with tomcat?
   Which one will you choose for a production environment? Why?
   Any Performance figures about these 2 servlet containers?

 Thx. and Regards.
 Steve.

 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Scale Tomcat-Apache - Is this true?

2002-02-14 Thread Ming Fai

to my understanding, tomcat 4.02 beta has fixed the mod_jk load balancing
problem. The newly released 4.02 should support load balancing, could
somebody confirm this?

regards,
mingfai

-Original Message-
From: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Scale Tomcat-Apache - Is this true?


 I have Apache 1.3.19 and Tomcat 4.0.1 running off a Suse Linux box A. I
 can scale this config for upto 1500 users giving acceptible response
times.
 I have an identical machine B.

 What I would like to do is run Apache on machine A, serving requests off
to
 Tomcat on machines A and B, some kind of load balancing to achieve better
 performance and server more users. Can somebody please point me to
 documentation that shows how to do this.


 Brown.

I found this on the internet. Is this true. Is there a workaround to this.

http://www.apachelabs.org/tomcat-user/200112.mbox/%3C01f101c17e30$577e27a0$4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E

If I do go back to TC3.3, what do I gain/lose in terms of functionality and
performance.


Brown.


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]