Re: [OT] Request an app test (free beer!)
On solaris:
SunOS
--p
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 17:26 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> I was informed last OT post I made that the subject should always
> include the word "beer". I added the "free" to get your attention :)
>
> I'm working on something for which I need to know what the os.name
> property on various OS's is. I would greatly appreciate it if some
> folks could try the following:
>
> public class test {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> System.out.println(System.getProperty("os.name"));
> }
> }
>
> I'm particularly interested in various *nix variants, Linux, Mac and
> such. Windows I already have answers for (although some verification to
> be sure nothing fishy is going on wouldn't hurt).
>
> If you could just post your OS and what the result was, I would greatly
> appreciate it. Thanks in advance!
>
--
Peter Maas
Application Architect / Streaming
Noterik Multimedia BV
Prins Hendrikkade 120
1011 AM Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)205929966
Fax: +31 (0)204688405
Gsm: +31 (0)624687952
Web: www.noterik.nl
--
Take a look at our streaming solutions:
http://www.streamedit.com/demo.html
Get firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
---
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Request an app test (free beer!)
On Debian GNU/Linux:
Linux
--p
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 17:26 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> I was informed last OT post I made that the subject should always
> include the word "beer". I added the "free" to get your attention :)
>
> I'm working on something for which I need to know what the os.name
> property on various OS's is. I would greatly appreciate it if some
> folks could try the following:
>
> public class test {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> System.out.println(System.getProperty("os.name"));
> }
> }
>
> I'm particularly interested in various *nix variants, Linux, Mac and
> such. Windows I already have answers for (although some verification to
> be sure nothing fishy is going on wouldn't hurt).
>
> If you could just post your OS and what the result was, I would greatly
> appreciate it. Thanks in advance!
>
--
Peter Maas
Application Architect / Streaming
Noterik Multimedia BV
Prins Hendrikkade 120
1011 AM Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)205929966
Fax: +31 (0)204688405
Gsm: +31 (0)624687952
Web: www.noterik.nl
--
Take a look at our streaming solutions:
http://www.streamedit.com/demo.html
Get firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
---
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat clustering / jwsdp soap / serializable
O.k. I just found out that I can force wscompile to add the implementation of Serializable to all datatypes (xSerializable="true")... however the part about older apps is still relevant. peter maas wrote: Hi list, I have been experimenting with the clustering options for a while. The main issue I seem to encounter over and over again is synchronizing objects which do not implement the serializable interface. Since we are using the jwsdp wscompile tool to generate source code based on a wsdl we have tons of beans generated which do not implement the Serializable interface (allthough, since they are sent over SOAP the can be serialized). If we want to connect suchs a bean to a session, I would have to modify the auto generated code or write adapter beans. Also it would mean that if I want to use older applications (for which we are not sure if they implement the Serializable interface) in a cluster setup, I would have to modify and recompile them! Is there a way to enable replication based on introspection if the Serialization interface is not implemented? Any other ideas? -- Peter Maas Application Architect / Streaming Noterik Multimedia BV Prins Hendrikkade 120 1011 AM Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)205929966 Fax: +31 (0)204688405 Gsm: +31 (0)624687952 Web: www.noterik.nl -- Take a look at our streaming solutions: http://www.streamedit.com/demo.html Get firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ --- :wq! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomcat clustering / jwsdp soap / serializable
Hi list, I have been experimenting with the clustering options for a while. The main issue I seem to encounter over and over again is synchronizing objects which do not implement the serializable interface. Since we are using the jwsdp wscompile tool to generate source code based on a wsdl we have tons of beans generated which do not implement the Serializable interface (allthough, since they are sent over SOAP the can be serialized). If we want to connect suchs a bean to a session, I would have to modify the auto generated code or write adapter beans. Also it would mean that if I want to use older applications (for which we are not sure if they implement the Serializable interface) in a cluster setup, I would have to modify and recompile them! Is there a way to enable replication based on introspection if the Serialization interface is not implemented? Any other ideas? -- Peter Maas Application Architect / Streaming Noterik Multimedia BV Prins Hendrikkade 120 1011 AM Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)205929966 Fax: +31 (0)204688405 Gsm: +31 (0)624687952 Web: www.noterik.nl -- Take a look at our streaming solutions: http://www.streamedit.com/demo.html Get firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ --- :wq! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OutOfMemoryError
Have you updated the server settings? In our case the default ammount of RAM the VM was allowed to allocate was fixed to 64 mb (brrr)! Also watch out for the max. ammout of threads your server can create... this probably will be your next problem. Dhruva B. Reddy wrote: We get OutOfMemoryError's on Tomcat 4.1.27, running on RH 7.3, Sun JDK 1.4.1_02 (with 512MB allocated to it) The box has 1GB of RAM, 2GB of swap space, and four Xeon processors. This error seems to occur during periods of low load (like during the Thanksgiving holiday), after which Tomcat exits. According to the calls Runtime.freeMemory() and .totalMemory(), it comes nowhere near using that much (we track it every five minutes by hitting a servlet that calls these methods). Has anyone seen anything like this? Thanks, Dhruva __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Include tag, dynamic param
What do you get in the page source when it runs?
Do you get ""
??
If so, then something is terribly wrong. If you get the include okay,
but the value of "BroadcastId" is
"{parameterValue | <%= BroadcastId %>}", then something else is wrong :(
This is exactly what I get..
BTW, I'm running tomcat 5.0.12 and am able to replicate this on a winxp
and a redhat 9.0 box...
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Include tag, dynamic param
In the documentation for the include tag I read that something like: Should work... This compiles / and runs... but the expression is never evaluated how does this work?? gr, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0
Not yet... didn't expect that to be the problem... P Asif Chowdhary wrote: Hi Peter, where you able to find rpm for mod-jk2 for redhat 9.0. I have not been able to find? Thanks Asif -Original Message- From: Peter Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:24 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0 Hi all, googling for mod_jk solutions yielded far to much tutorials. what is the best one?? P - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0
Hi all, googling for mod_jk solutions yielded far to much tutorials. what is the best one?? P - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removed session but Browser can still display the page
When a client pushes the browsers 'back' button, this page is often read from cache... adding the following line to the HTML head might help: gr, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a problem with using HttpSession class. When the user login, I create a new session by "request.getSession(true)". When the user logout, the session is removed by "session.invalidate()". In doing this, when the user is trying to go back to the previous page without login, the browser should not show the page because the servlet knows that the session for this user has already been invalidated. My problem is that In JBuilder, the code works as expected. But in Tomcat, it always failed. The browser can display the previous page when I use "Back" button in the toolbar, or when I type in the URL for the pages that should be displayed only after the user login. Can anybody help me? Thanks in advance. Kelly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SessionListener
What I actually want to do is call some destruct methods in objects bound to the session... P Christopher Schultz wrote: Peter, I wondered if there is a way detect somehting like a 'sessionWillBeDestroyed' event. since the sessionDestroyed method in a sessionListener seems to be called after the session was destroyed. I don't think you can 'veto' the destruction of a session, if that's what you mean. All the container will do is notify you that the session is in the process of being destroyed. -chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SessionListener
Since we're developing on tomcat 5.0.12 the container should be 2.4 but still it is called after the session was invalidated. Peter Jon Wingfield wrote: Not in servlet 2.3 containers. Servlet spec 2.4 has changed the semantics of the sessionDestoyed method so Tomcat 5 should notify before the session is invalidated... http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/index.html HTH, Jon Peter Maas wrote: Hi, I wondered if there is a way detect somehting like a 'sessionWillBeDestroyed' event. since the sessionDestroyed method in a sessionListener seems to be called after the session was destroyed. Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SessionListener
Hi, I wondered if there is a way detect somehting like a 'sessionWillBeDestroyed' event. since the sessionDestroyed method in a sessionListener seems to be called after the session was destroyed. Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
