Re: URGENT: many apache processes

2003-02-02 Thread mlh
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Sven Köhler wrote:
> just for others:
> i had to set the number of maxProcessors in AJP13 connector to a value 
> greater then MaxProcesses value in apache's http.conf.

If you have a number of apache servers using the same
Tomcat, do you have to set maxProcessors in the AJP13
connector to greater than MaxProcesses * number of apaches?


Matt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: HP-UX 10.20 + Oracle

2003-01-08 Thread mlh
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:01:33AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:03:06PM -, John Clark wrote:
> > 
> > I have tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH but it still does not work.
> 
> hp-ux binaries have an inbuilt idea of where to find share libraries.
> It's called 'chattr' (change attributes).

That should read ;
  The command to change the builtin path is called chattr. (change attributes)


  Matt



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: HP-UX 10.20 + Oracle

2003-01-08 Thread mlh
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:03:06PM -, John Clark wrote:
> 
> I have tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH but it still does not work.

hp-ux binaries have an inbuilt idea of where to find share libraries.
It's called 'chattr' (change attributes).

This is in addition to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH var.  btw, Isn't this called SHLIB_PATH
or something under hp-ux 10.20?

Also, why hpux 10.20?  It doesn't have kernel threading and you'll
get terrible performance.  HP's own docs say that hpux 10.20 is all
but incompatible with java.

You may as well run linux.


Matt

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: mod_jk tomcat/apache connector issue

2003-01-07 Thread mlh
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:45:22PM -0500, Turner, John wrote:
> 
> Well, CoyoteConnector can support multiple protocols: JK, JK2, HTTP, HTTPS,
> depending on how it's used, what port it is listening on, etc.
> CoyoteConnector is enabled by default on port 8009 in Tomcat 4.1.x for
> JK/JK2.  If you disable that connector and enable Ajp13Connector (disabled
> by default in Tomcat 4.1.x) on port 8009 instead, you can only use JK.  
> 

How do Ajp13Connector and CoyoteConnector compare for stability
and maturity?

(Performance and features are distinctly lower priorities for me)


Matt

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: File classes12.zip for Oracle on Tomcat ...

2003-01-07 Thread mlh
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:10:36AM -0800, Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego wrote:
> 
> 
> I had to rename them to .jar and put them in c:\ApacheTomcat\lib

We made a symlink on Unix.

Matt

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Apache Mod_jk.conf file.

2002-11-29 Thread mlh
Andoni wrote:

I have my .conf files working fine, I just have a question that is bugging
me.

I am told everywhere to put my mod_jk.conf file under the /tomcat/conf/
directory and then include it in the bottom of my httpd.conf file.  Is there
any real reason for this separation?  Can I just take all that is in this
file and paste it into the bottom of my httpd.conf file where the include
statement is?


No reason at all, in fact that's what I do.

In fact in some setups, mod_jk.conf CANNOT be in tomcat's conf dir, 
because tomcat could be on a separate machine.  Since mod_jk.conf is
properly an apache conf file, not a tomcat one, the correct place
imho is in apache's conf dir.

Matt




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 



Re: MOD_JK

2002-11-22 Thread mlh
José Moreira wrote:

hello im trying to use mod_jk in apache 2 for winXP Pro...
 
i placed mod_jk.dll in the {apache}/modules
 
then configured it : "LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.dll"
 
but apache gave this error starting
 
"cant find module : d:/Javawork/Apache/modules/mod_jk.dll"
 

If relative, it should be from the base of apache.
Is D:\javawork\apache\ your apache serverroot?

Anyway, try the absolute path.

Matt





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: building the mod_jk2 in one linux SuSE 8.1

2002-11-16 Thread mlh
Dionisio Ruiz de Zarate wrote:

i have build it (i think it) and i see in my line one file with the name :
mo_jk.so.0.0.0. is this the mod_jk.so file?


yes


with is the version? mod_jk or mod_jk2?


mod_jk







--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Basic Setup Question...

2002-11-12 Thread mlh

FWIW, you do not have to do ANYTHING to
the server.xml as distributed to be able
to have apache forward *.jsp's to tomcat.

All you have to do is install mod_jk in
apache, edit apache's httpd.conf and write
the mod_jk.conf.  Of these 3, building and
installing the mod_jk.so is perhaps the
most time-consuming/difficult.

For the last 2, copious examples now exist
on the jakarta web site and elsewhere on the
'net.

Matt



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: mod_jk runs but doesnt process

2002-10-28 Thread mlh





workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat 
workers.catalina_home=/usr/local/tomcat 
workers.java_home=/usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0_01 

ps=/ 
worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 
worker.ajp13.port=8009 
worker.ajp13.host=127.0.0.1 
worker.ajp12.type=ajp13


You have a curious workers.properties file there.

Don't you want:

worker.list=ajp13 
worker.ajp13.port=8009 
worker.ajp13.host=127.0.0.1
worker.ajp13.type=ajp13

Regards,
Matt






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: