From tomcat user guide
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html)
Up until now we have not discussed Tomcat as a server add on, instead we
have considered it as a stand-alone container and discussed how it can be
used. There are however a few problems with this picture:
1.. Tomcat is not as fast as Apache when it comes to static pages.
2.. Tomcat is not as configurable as Apache.
3.. Tomcat is not as robust as Apache.
4.. There are many sites with long time investment in certain web servers,
for example, sites that are using CGI scripts/Server API modules/perl/php...
We cannot assume that all of them will want to ditch this legacy.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2.36, Tomcat 4.x and JBoss 3.0
I am not an expert, but from what I have seen floating around you would
use apache + tomcat when
you have high requests on static html pages. This way, you offload the
static pages to apache to
free up tomecat for the jsps. Hopefully someone else will chime in with
more info than this.
Adam
--- Segree, Gareth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to the JSP EJB business and I'm trying to setup a server
using
opensource software.
1) Is there any special configuration to install apache 2.x tomcat 4.x
from source.
2) When should I use tomcat only vs apache + tomcat plugin.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
