Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Richard Pfeil]

I had the problem originally and have read all the posts.  Here some extra
information:
I am using RH Linux 7.3, Apache 1.3.26, Tomcat 4.0.4.

I am using Apache without ssl but I tried both of these binaries just to be
certain:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0
/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-1.3-eapi.so
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0
/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so

Thanks very much for the help so far.


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:20 AM
Subject: RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work


>
> I agree--you could get into a quagmire this way. At this point, I would
> just settle for a version compiled against a plain-vanilla Apache 1.3.27
> build.
>
>
> |-+>
> | |   Milt Epstein |
> | |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | |   u>   |
> | ||
> | |   10/09/2002 02:17 |
> | |   PM   |
> | |   Please respond to|
> | |   "Tomcat Users|
> | |   List"|
> | ||
> |-+>
>
>---
---|
>   |
|
>   |   To:   Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
>   |   cc:
|
>   |   Subject:  RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work
   |
>
>---
---|
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Methinks it would be a good idea to maintain the binaries compiled
> > to the latest, greatest version of Apache (namely 1.3.27).
>
> Yes, that makes sense, but it's only part of the equation.  For
> example, we don't know what version the person who was having the
> problem was using.  And the Apache version is only one of the
> variables, what about whether it's EAPI or not, or whether it's built
> with mod_ssl, etc.  And I'm guessing it's not feasible for the
> Apache/Tomcat/Connectors people to have built versions for all
> possible permutations.
>
> Anyway, I was just pointing out where the problem may potentially lie.
> (And apparently the possibility that there was indeed something wrong
> with the binary hasn't been ruled out either.)
>
>
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:
> >
> > > Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> > > binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> > > email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> > > binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> > > problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.
> >
> > I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
> > sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
> > trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
> > hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
> > trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
> > the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
> > mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.
> >
> >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> > > > binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> > > >
> > > > Raj
> > > > Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > > > > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > > > > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > > > > results in this error message:
> > > > > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> > > > into server:
> > > > > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > > > > ap_ctx_get
>

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[jcosta]

I agree--you could get into a quagmire this way. At this point, I would
just settle for a version compiled against a plain-vanilla Apache 1.3.27
build.


|-+>
| |   Milt Epstein |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   u>   |
| ||
| |   10/09/2002 02:17 |
| |   PM   |
| |   Please respond to|
| |   "Tomcat Users|
| |   List"|
| ||
|-+>
  
>--|
  |
  |
  |   To:   Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  |
  |   cc:  
  |
  |   Subject:  RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work  
  |
  
>--|




On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Methinks it would be a good idea to maintain the binaries compiled
> to the latest, greatest version of Apache (namely 1.3.27).

Yes, that makes sense, but it's only part of the equation.  For
example, we don't know what version the person who was having the
problem was using.  And the Apache version is only one of the
variables, what about whether it's EAPI or not, or whether it's built
with mod_ssl, etc.  And I'm guessing it's not feasible for the
Apache/Tomcat/Connectors people to have built versions for all
possible permutations.

Anyway, I was just pointing out where the problem may potentially lie.
(And apparently the possibility that there was indeed something wrong
with the binary hasn't been ruled out either.)


> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:
>
> > Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> > binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> > email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> > binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> > problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.
>
> I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
> sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
> trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
> hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
> trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
> the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
> mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.
>
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> > >
> > >
> > > Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> > > binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> > >
> > > Raj
> > > Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > > > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > > >
> > > > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > > > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > > > results in this error message:
> > > > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> > > into server:
> > > > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > > > ap_ctx_get
> > > >
> > > > What is going wrong?

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>








--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Milt Epstein]

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Methinks it would be a good idea to maintain the binaries compiled
> to the latest, greatest version of Apache (namely 1.3.27).

Yes, that makes sense, but it's only part of the equation.  For
example, we don't know what version the person who was having the
problem was using.  And the Apache version is only one of the
variables, what about whether it's EAPI or not, or whether it's built
with mod_ssl, etc.  And I'm guessing it's not feasible for the
Apache/Tomcat/Connectors people to have built versions for all
possible permutations.

Anyway, I was just pointing out where the problem may potentially lie.
(And apparently the possibility that there was indeed something wrong
with the binary hasn't been ruled out either.)


> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:
>
> > Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> > binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> > email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> > binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> > problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.
>
> I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
> sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
> trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
> hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
> trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
> the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
> mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.
>
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> > >
> > >
> > > Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> > > binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> > >
> > > Raj
> > > Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > > > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > > >
> > > > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > > > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > > > results in this error message:
> > > > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> > > into server:
> > > > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > > > ap_ctx_get
> > > >
> > > > What is going wrong?

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Luciano Kiniti Issoe]

Hi all,

I'm using the apache 1.3.26 and  SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386) - Kernel 2.4.4-4GB
(0). Had the same problem yesterday.
To solve this I compiled mod_jk from source.
Maybe there's really a problem with the binaries.

miagi


- Original Message -
From: "Raj Saini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work


> I tried to use the binary on Apache Server version 1.3.23. I am using
> Redhat 7.2 Kernal version 2.4.7
>
> Raj
>
> Milt Epstein wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> >>binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> >>email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> >>binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> >>problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.
> >
> >
> > I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
> > sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
> > trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
> > hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
> > trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
> > the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
> > mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.
> >
> >
> >
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> >>>To: Tomcat Users List
> >>>Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> >>>binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> >>>
> >>>Raj
> >>>Richard Pfeil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> >>>>
> >>>>The following line in httpd.conf:
> >>>>LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> >>>>results in this error message:
> >>>>Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> >>>
> >>>into server:
> >>>
> >>>>/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> >>>>ap_ctx_get
> >>>>
> >>>>What is going wrong?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>
> >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>
> >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >
> > Milt Epstein
> > Research Programmer
> > Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
> > Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
> > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Raj Saini]

I tried to use the binary on Apache Server version 1.3.23. I am using 
Redhat 7.2 Kernal version 2.4.7

Raj

Milt Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:
> 
> 
>>Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
>>binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
>>email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
>>binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
>>problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.
> 
> 
> I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
> sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
> trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
> hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
> trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
> the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
> mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.
> 
> 
> 
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
>>>To: Tomcat Users List
>>>Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
>>>
>>>
>>>Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
>>>binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
>>>
>>>Raj
>>>Richard Pfeil wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
>>>>
>>>>The following line in httpd.conf:
>>>>LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
>>>>results in this error message:
>>>>Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
>>>
>>>into server:
>>>
>>>>/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
>>>>ap_ctx_get
>>>>
>>>>What is going wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
> 
> Milt Epstein
> Research Programmer
> Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
> Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[jcosta]

Methinks it would be a good idea to maintain the binaries compiled to the
latest, greatest version of Apache (namely 1.3.27).


|-+>
| |   Milt Epstein |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   u>   |
| ||
| |   10/09/2002 01:16 |
| |   PM   |
| |   Please respond to|
| |   "Tomcat Users|
| |   List"|
| ||
|-+>
  
>--|
  |
  |
  |   To:   Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  |
  |   cc:  
  |
  |   Subject:  RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work  
  |
  
>--|




On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:

> Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.

I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.


> > -Original Message-
> > From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> >
> >
> > Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> > binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> >
> > Raj
> > Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > >
> > > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > > results in this error message:
> > > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> > into server:
> > > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > > ap_ctx_get
> > >
> > > What is going wrong?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>








--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Milt Epstein]

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Raj Saini wrote:

> Yes, there was a problem with binary one week ago. I am not sure if
> binaries are updated after that. The error message was the same as
> in this post.

Or maybe there really was something wrong with the binary :-).


> Turner, John wrote:
> > Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the binary
> > maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and email message
> > from you with details.  There's no point in having binaries if they aren't
> > usable.  As far as I know, this exact problem (same exact error message) was
> > covered by Henri last week.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> >>To: Tomcat Users List
> >>Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> >>
> >>
> >>Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> >>binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> >>
> >>Raj
> >>Richard Pfeil wrote:
> >>
> >>>I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> >>>
> >>>The following line in httpd.conf:
> >>>LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> >>>results in this error message:
> >>>Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> >>
> >>into server:
> >>
> >>>/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> >>>ap_ctx_get
> >>>
> >>>What is going wrong?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Milt Epstein]

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Turner, John wrote:

> Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the
> binary maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and
> email message from you with details.  There's no point in having
> binaries if they aren't usable.  As far as I know, this exact
> problem (same exact error message) was covered by Henri last week.

I don't think that there's "something wrong with the binary" in the
sense that it's broken, but rather that the particular binary they're
trying to use was built for/to/with a different version of Apache, and
hence won't work with it.  The error message seems to indicate it's
trying to call an Apache function, ap_ctx_get, that doesn't exist in
the Apache libraries they have.  So they either need a different
mod_jk binary, or a different Apache.


> > -Original Message-
> > From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> >
> >
> > Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the
> > binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> >
> > Raj
> > Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > >
> > > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > > results in this error message:
> > > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so
> > into server:
> > > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > > ap_ctx_get
> > >
> > > What is going wrong?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Integration and Software Engineering (ISE)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Raj Saini]

Yes, there was a problem with binary one week ago. I am not sure if 
binaries are updated after that. The error message was the same as in 
this post.

Raj

Turner, John wrote:
> Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the binary
> maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and email message
> from you with details.  There's no point in having binaries if they aren't
> usable.  As far as I know, this exact problem (same exact error message) was
> covered by Henri last week.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
>>To: Tomcat Users List
>>Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
>>
>>
>>Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the 
>>binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
>>
>>Raj
>>Richard Pfeil wrote:
>>
>>>I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
>>>
>>>The following line in httpd.conf:
>>>LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
>>>results in this error message:
>>>Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so 
>>
>>into server:
>>
>>>/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
>>>ap_ctx_get
>>>
>>>What is going wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Turner, John]

Are you sure there is something wrong with the binary?  If so, the binary
maintainers (like Henri Gomez) would probably appreciate and email message
from you with details.  There's no point in having binaries if they aren't
usable.  As far as I know, this exact problem (same exact error message) was
covered by Henri last week.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Raj Saini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work
> 
> 
> Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the 
> binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.
> 
> Raj
> Richard Pfeil wrote:
> > I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> > 
> > The following line in httpd.conf:
> > LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> > results in this error message:
> > Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so 
> into server:
> > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> > ap_ctx_get
> > 
> > What is going wrong?
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Raj Saini]

Pls build the mod_jk from source. These some thing wrong with the 
binary. I faced the same problem one week ago.

Raj
Richard Pfeil wrote:
> I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> 
> The following line in httpd.conf:
> LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
> results in this error message:
> Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into server:
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
> ap_ctx_get
> 
> What is going wrong?
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[jcosta]

I think he just grabbed the binary version build for a non-SSL Apache
server. Is that correct? I experienced the same problem trying to integrate
the binary.


|-+>
| |   sonam singh  |
| ||
| ||
| |   10/09/2002 03:24 |
| |   AM   |
| |   Please respond to|
| |   "Tomcat Users|
| |   List"|
| ||
|-+>
  
>--|
  |
  |
  |   To:   Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  |
  |   cc:  
  |
  |       Subject:  Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work  
  |
  
>--|




how u compile the mod_jk ,have u get the latest source
of mod_jk from cvs . look  at the compilation option
of libtool when mod_jk is compiling .also check the
home of apache/build/config_var_mk  file the option
EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE it shoul
be EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -D_REENTRANT
because mod_jk uses the apxs for  compilation

regards
Sonam Singh


--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
>
>  >The following line in httpd.conf:
>  >LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
>  >results in this error message:
>  >Cannot laod
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into
> >server:
>  >/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so:
> undefined symbol:
>  >ap_ctx_get
>
>  >What is going wrong?
>
> Thanks to give more information on your os, gcc and
> apache settings please.
>
> The shared lib was built under Redhat 7.2, kernel
> 2.4.9-34, with
> gcc 2.96 against glibc 2.2.4-30 and Redhat Apache
> 1.3.22-6 and
> mod_ssl-2.8.5-6.
>
> Regards
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>








--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[sonam singh]

how u compile the mod_jk ,have u get the latest source
of mod_jk from cvs . look  at the compilation option
of libtool when mod_jk is compiling .also check the
home of apache/build/config_var_mk  file the option
EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE it shoul
be EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -D_REENTRANT 
because mod_jk uses the apxs for  compilation 

regards
Sonam Singh


--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >I am unable to get mod_jk to work.
> 
>  >The following line in httpd.conf:
>  >LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
>  >results in this error message:
>  >Cannot laod
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into
> >server:
>  >/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so:
> undefined symbol:
>  >ap_ctx_get
> 
>  >What is going wrong?
> 
> Thanks to give more information on your os, gcc and
> apache settings please.
> 
> The shared lib was built under Redhat 7.2, kernel
> 2.4.9-34, with
> gcc 2.96 against glibc 2.2.4-30 and Redhat Apache
> 1.3.22-6 and 
> mod_ssl-2.8.5-6.
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Henri Gomez]

 >I am unable to get mod_jk to work.

 >The following line in httpd.conf:
 >LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
 >results in this error message:
 >Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into >server:
 >/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
 >ap_ctx_get

 >What is going wrong?

Thanks to give more information on your os, gcc and apache settings please.

The shared lib was built under Redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.9-34, with
gcc 2.96 against glibc 2.2.4-30 and Redhat Apache 1.3.22-6 and 
mod_ssl-2.8.5-6.

Regards


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Chuck Coker]

One place that I frequently get errors like that is when I compile
updated source for one module and then try to run something else that
calls the module.

For example, I recently updated OpenSSL because of the Linux slapper
worm. After that, I got the same error message you are getting when
trying to run Apache (except it was for a different module).

I had to get the source to Apache (I originally installed Apache from
an RPM) and recompile everything. That solved the problem.

Chuck Coker

 Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>The following line in httpd.conf:
>LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
>results in this error message:
>Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into
>server:
>/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
>ap_ctx_get
>
>What is going wrong?



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Cannot get mod_jk to work

[Richard Pfeil]

I am unable to get mod_jk to work.

The following line in httpd.conf:
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so
results in this error message:
Cannot laod /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk2-1.3.noeapi.so: undefined symbol:
ap_ctx_get

What is going wrong?


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: