Re: Please help me... URGENT
Hi There, I would go with Tomcat+SSL, the setup is much easier than your other alternative. The only thing you really lose by not using apache is the ability to use virtual hosts. Mike On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Sujith Mathew wrote: Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me... URGENT
One option is to use IIS + SSL + Tomcat -Original Message- From: Sujith Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me... URGENT Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me... URGENT
I wouldn't use IIS, especially if you're interested in having a secure server. IIS is historically unsecure. SSL won't mean much if someone can break into your system via your web server. On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE wrote: One option is to use IIS + SSL + Tomcat -Original Message- From: Sujith Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me... URGENT Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help me... URGENT
Hi, If you need to get it up and running fast, just use Tomcat with SSL. You can always add Apache later if you think it will boost performance. Setting up an Apache+SSL+Tomcat server can be tricky if you are a newbie (and even if you aren't). A lot of this depends on what you are running and how heavy the demands on the server will be. If you have a lot of static pages (and maybe even if you don't) Apache with SSL and Tomcat may be faster. In that setup you use Apache to do the SSL, which is theoretically faster because it is a binary on the server. In reality the extra overhead of the transfer from Apache to Tomcat of dynamic pages may nullify any speed advantages. - Original Message - Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me... URGENT
Why are we worried about securing a Windows 2000 server?? I thought they just wanted it set up and running. -Original Message- From: Michael B Sebetich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Please help me... URGENT I wouldn't use IIS, especially if you're interested in having a secure server. IIS is historically unsecure. SSL won't mean much if someone can break into your system via your web server. On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE wrote: One option is to use IIS + SSL + Tomcat -Original Message- From: Sujith Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me... URGENT Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me... URGENT
I would assume that the use of SSL implies sensitive data being handled by the Win 2k server. Why risk compromising that data by using IIS? On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE wrote: Why are we worried about securing a Windows 2000 server?? I thought they just wanted it set up and running. -Original Message- From: Michael B Sebetich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Please help me... URGENT I wouldn't use IIS, especially if you're interested in having a secure server. IIS is historically unsecure. SSL won't mean much if someone can break into your system via your web server. On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE wrote: One option is to use IIS + SSL + Tomcat -Original Message- From: Sujith Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me... URGENT Please help me . My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc. I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL. Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer. Thanks in advance Sujith Mathew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
