RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez 

 >Just another point on this.

 >I had the same problem, and upon investigation found that the two files
 >on the tomcat site (as of yesterday anyway) are identical, and I think
 >are both the eapi versions.

 >I recompiled manually from the sources and the problem went away.

That's a good information, I'll make a new build ASAP.

Stay tuned and thanks for the feedback



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Gary Henson 

Just another point on this.

I had the same problem, and upon investigation found that the two files
on the tomcat site (as of yesterday anyway) are identical, and I think 
are both the eapi versions.

I recompiled manually from the sources and the problem went away.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 3:36
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so


Just to let everyone know, I downloaded John Turner's mod_jk.so and the
problem went away (have not finished testing, however). The URL is:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.

Thanks to John!

Ben Ricker 

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:53, Ben Ricker wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:08, Turner, John wrote:
> > The reason I ask is that the ap* functions are 1.3, and I usually
see error
> > messages about ap_table_get and similar when either an Apache 2.0
module is
> > being used with Apache 1.3, or vice versa.
> > 
> > John
> 
> This may add some info: I compiled Apache with ApacheToolbox. The
> modules are static but it has DSO support in it. Then again, I would
> expect an error much earlier in the load process then an undefined
> symbol.
> 
> I cannot guarantee that it IS the 1.3 connectorthe filename
suggests
> it is.
> 
> Ben Ricker
> 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:01 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> > > > Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> > > 
> > > No EAPI...As the download site says:
> > > 
> > >   * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl
> > > 
> > > I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.
> > > 
> > > Ben
> > > 
> > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads
in
> > > > > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > > > > i386. I am
> > > > > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux 
> > > release 7.1
> > > > > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> > > > > explain the
> > > > > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > > > > Syntax error on line 208 of
/usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > > > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > > > > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > > > > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > > > > binaries rely upon?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ben Ricker
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Wellinx.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -- 
> > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wellinx.com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -- 
> Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wellinx.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Ben Ricker 

Thanks for the info. I will go back through the docs and see what may
have happened. I will let you know if I still have the issue after
perusing the docs.

Ben Ricker


On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 10:54, Henri Gomez wrote:
>  >Just to let everyone know, I downloaded John Turner's mod_jk.so and the
>  >problem went away (have not finished testing, however). The URL is:
>  >http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.
> 
> Do you know that jk 1.2.0 has been released ?
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/
> 
> Do you know that there is up to date documentation included ?
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/
> 
> Do you know that the jk included in tomcat 4.0.4 IS NOT the same that JK 
> 1.2.0 release ?
> 
> For JK 1.2.0 release, jakarta-tomcat-connectors developpers spend hours 
> in providing a decent documentation, binaries for many platforms and
> we expect users to use them.
> 
> We want to be sure that the bugzilla's reports which could be filled 
> about jk will be valid's one and not spend our time trying to locate
> a bug which has been fixed by 1.2.0 release.
> 
> If you've got problem with the binaries we provide, just give us more
> informations about your settings so we could help you, correct our 
> builds, create new one's or fix code/build processes.
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez 

 >Just to let everyone know, I downloaded John Turner's mod_jk.so and the
 >problem went away (have not finished testing, however). The URL is:
 >http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.

Do you know that jk 1.2.0 has been released ?

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/

Do you know that there is up to date documentation included ?

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/doc/

Do you know that the jk included in tomcat 4.0.4 IS NOT the same that JK 
1.2.0 release ?

For JK 1.2.0 release, jakarta-tomcat-connectors developpers spend hours 
in providing a decent documentation, binaries for many platforms and
we expect users to use them.

We want to be sure that the bugzilla's reports which could be filled 
about jk will be valid's one and not spend our time trying to locate
a bug which has been fixed by 1.2.0 release.

If you've got problem with the binaries we provide, just give us more
informations about your settings so we could help you, correct our 
builds, create new one's or fix code/build processes.

Regards


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Turner, John 


No problem, glad I could help.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:36 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> Just to let everyone know, I downloaded John Turner's 
> mod_jk.so and the
> problem went away (have not finished testing, however). The URL is:
> http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.
> 
> Thanks to John!
> 
> Ben Ricker 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:53, Ben Ricker wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:08, Turner, John wrote:
> > > The reason I ask is that the ap* functions are 1.3, and I 
> usually see error
> > > messages about ap_table_get and similar when either an 
> Apache 2.0 module is
> > > being used with Apache 1.3, or vice versa.
> > > 
> > > John
> > 
> > This may add some info: I compiled Apache with ApacheToolbox. The
> > modules are static but it has DSO support in it. Then again, I would
> > expect an error much earlier in the load process then an undefined
> > symbol.
> > 
> > I cannot guarantee that it IS the 1.3 connectorthe 
> filename suggests
> > it is.
> > 
> > Ben Ricker
> > 
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:01 PM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> > > > > Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> > > > 
> > > > No EAPI...As the download site says:
> > > > 
> > > >   * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl
> > > > 
> > > > I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.
> > > > 
> > > > Ben
> > > > 
> > > > > John
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > > > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's 
> downloads in
> > > > > > 
> /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > > > > > i386. I am
> > > > > > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux 
> > > > release 7.1
> > > > > > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. 
> That may 
> > > > > > explain the
> > > > > > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > > > > > Syntax error on line 208 of 
> /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > > > > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > > > > > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > > > > > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > > > > > binaries rely upon?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Ben Ricker
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Wellinx.com
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > -- 
> > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Wellinx.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -- 
> > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wellinx.com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -- 
> Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wellinx.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Ben Ricker 

Just to let everyone know, I downloaded John Turner's mod_jk.so and the
problem went away (have not finished testing, however). The URL is:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.

Thanks to John!

Ben Ricker 

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:53, Ben Ricker wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:08, Turner, John wrote:
> > The reason I ask is that the ap* functions are 1.3, and I usually see error
> > messages about ap_table_get and similar when either an Apache 2.0 module is
> > being used with Apache 1.3, or vice versa.
> > 
> > John
> 
> This may add some info: I compiled Apache with ApacheToolbox. The
> modules are static but it has DSO support in it. Then again, I would
> expect an error much earlier in the load process then an undefined
> symbol.
> 
> I cannot guarantee that it IS the 1.3 connectorthe filename suggests
> it is.
> 
> Ben Ricker
> 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:01 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> > > > Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> > > 
> > > No EAPI...As the download site says:
> > > 
> > >   * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl
> > > 
> > > I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.
> > > 
> > > Ben
> > > 
> > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
> > > > > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > > > > i386. I am
> > > > > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux 
> > > release 7.1
> > > > > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> > > > > explain the
> > > > > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > > > > Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > > > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > > > > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > > > > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > > > > binaries rely upon?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ben Ricker
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Wellinx.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -- 
> > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wellinx.com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -- 
> Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wellinx.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez 

 >[root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
 >Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
 >Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: 
 >/usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined symbol: ap_ctx_get

ap_ctx_get is a standard Apache definition, are you using a standard
Apache distro (ie the Redhat one) or a custom build one ?

 From your path, it semms you're using a custom one

 >Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the binaries 
 >rely upon?

noeapi is for apache WITHOUT SSL, eapi for apache WITH SSL.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-09-30 Thread Raj Saini 

I had the same proplem on Redhat 7.2. I have compiled from source and it 
worked.

Raj
Turner, John wrote:
> Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
>>To: Tomcat Users List
>>Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
>>
>>
>>I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
>>/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
>>i386. I am
>>running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux release 7.1
>>(Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
>>explain the
>>following error when trying to start Apache:
>>
>>
>>[root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
>>Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
>>Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
>>server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
>>symbol: ap_ctx_get
>>
>>Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
>>binaries rely upon?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Ben Ricker
>>
>>-- 
>>Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Wellinx.com
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-09-30 Thread Ben Ricker 

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:08, Turner, John wrote:
> The reason I ask is that the ap* functions are 1.3, and I usually see error
> messages about ap_table_get and similar when either an Apache 2.0 module is
> being used with Apache 1.3, or vice versa.
> 
> John

This may add some info: I compiled Apache with ApacheToolbox. The
modules are static but it has DSO support in it. Then again, I would
expect an error much earlier in the load process then an undefined
symbol.

I cannot guarantee that it IS the 1.3 connectorthe filename suggests
it is.

Ben Ricker

> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:01 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> > > Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> > 
> > No EAPI...As the download site says:
> > 
> >   * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl
> > 
> > I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.
> > 
> > Ben
> > 
> > > John
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
> > > > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > > > i386. I am
> > > > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux 
> > release 7.1
> > > > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> > > > explain the
> > > > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > > > Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > > > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > > > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > > > 
> > > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > > > binaries rely upon?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > 
> > > > Ben Ricker
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Wellinx.com
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -- 
> Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wellinx.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-09-30 Thread Turner, John 


The reason I ask is that the ap* functions are 1.3, and I usually see error
messages about ap_table_get and similar when either an Apache 2.0 module is
being used with Apache 1.3, or vice versa.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> > Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?
> 
> No EAPI...As the download site says:
> 
>   * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl
> 
> I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.
> 
> Ben
> 
> > John
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
> > > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > > i386. I am
> > > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux 
> release 7.1
> > > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> > > explain the
> > > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > > Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > > 
> > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > > binaries rely upon?
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > 
> > > Ben Ricker
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Wellinx.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-09-30 Thread Ben Ricker 

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:53, Turner, John wrote:
> Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?

No EAPI...As the download site says:

  * mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so is for Apache 1.3.x without mod_ssl

I do not have mod_ssl installed. Verified that through httpd-l.

Ben

> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> > 
> > 
> > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
> > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> > i386. I am
> > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux release 7.1
> > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> > explain the
> > following error when trying to start Apache:
> > 
> > 
> > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> > Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> > symbol: ap_ctx_get
> > 
> > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> > binaries rely upon?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > 
> > Ben Ricker
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wellinx.com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
-- 
Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Problem with mod_jk.so

2002-09-30 Thread Turner, John 


Which one did you download?  EAPI or no EAPI?

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in
> /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/
> i386. I am
> running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux release 7.1
> (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may 
> explain the
> following error when trying to start Apache:
> 
> 
> [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest
> Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into 
> server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined 
> symbol: ap_ctx_get
> 
> Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the 
> binaries rely upon?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Ben Ricker
> 
> -- 
> Ben Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wellinx.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: