RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-31 Thread Emir Alikadic (ADNOC IST)

[SNIP]

 
 This is going the last message with HTML enabled on the 
 mailing list. :)
 Remember to modify your settings :) Those are the rejected stuff:
  - text/html
  - text/rtf
  - text/enriched
  - text/x-vcard
 
 Pier
 

C'mon, Mary, our job here is done! [rides off into the sunset]

On a serious note, I'd like to apologise to all of you who may have
been offended in any way with my little crusade against the
Stylelized messages.  The end justifies the means, right?

Regards,



Emir.

DISCLAIMER: The content of the preceding message is exclusively
the personal opinion of the author, i.e. myself. Under no
circumstances should the content be attributed to my employer.



RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-31 Thread Loïc Lefèvre

The next question could be:
And for the attachments?!? ;)

just kidding :)

-Message d'origine-
De : Emir Alikadic (ADNOC IST) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 31 juillet 2001 12:32
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc
bridge on linux)


[SNIP]


 This is going the last message with HTML enabled on the
 mailing list. :)
 Remember to modify your settings :) Those are the rejected stuff:
  - text/html
  - text/rtf
  - text/enriched
  - text/x-vcard

 Pier


C'mon, Mary, our job here is done! [rides off into the sunset]

On a serious note, I'd like to apologise to all of you who may have
been offended in any way with my little crusade against the
Stylelized messages.  The end justifies the means, right?

Regards,



Emir.

DISCLAIMER: The content of the preceding message is exclusively
the personal opinion of the author, i.e. myself. Under no
circumstances should the content be attributed to my employer.




Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-31 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli

Jim Cheesman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 12:32 PM 31/07/01, you wrote:

  - text/x-vcard
 
 What, no vcards??? I used to be able to waste hours tracking down and
 deleting the little buggers from my hard drive! Now what am I going to do
 on a Friday afternoon... after defrag, anti-virus, cleanup etc.

Next Friday, install a decent operating system :)

Pier




Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-30 Thread Moin Anjum H.

[X] +1 - Plain Text only. Strip HTML on the mailing list.
[ ]  0 - I don't give a damn shit.
[ ] -1 - You mad? I love HTML in messages and want to keep using it.





RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-30 Thread Randy Layman

+0



Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-30 Thread David Smith

On Sunday 29 July 2001 10:42 am, you wrote:

[snip...]
 One thing I can ask to you guys is, do you want me to strip HTML out of
 your messages and reject emails only with HTML content type? Plenary vote
 open until 11:59 PM GMT of Monday 07/30/2001.


  [ X] +1 - Plain Text only. Strip HTML on the mailing list.

 [ ]  0 - I don't give a damn shit.
 [ ] -1 - You mad? I love HTML in messages and want to keep using it.


I'd emphasize it more if I could.  HTML also comes with it's share of 
security headaches for those with HTML enabled email clients.

 

David Smith, CISSP
Network Operations Supervisor
Cornell University Department of Entomology
2121 Comstock Hall
Ithaca, NY  14853
Phone: (607) 255-9571
Fax: (607) 255-0939
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-30 Thread Nael Mohammad


+1 for plain text






-Original Message-
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc
bridge on linux)


Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 [ ] +1 - Plain Text only. Strip HTML on the mailing list.
 [ ]  0 - I don't give a damn shit.
 [ ] -1 - You mad? I love HTML in messages and want to keep using it.

We got more than 20 +1s, a couple of 0s, and no -1. So I asked root to
modify the mailing list...
I'll keep you updated on how this is going to happen (maybe few hours, maybe
few days!) :)

Pier



Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-30 Thread Frans

+1 from me.. no HTML email.


- Original Message -
From: Srinivas Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc
bridge on linux)


 +1


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-29 Thread Artigas, Ricardo Y.

yes!

 -Original Message-
 From: Pier P. Fumagalli [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 10:42 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc
 bridge on linux)
 
 Emir Alikadic (ADNOC IST) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  What is rude was his posting on the list in format other than plain
 text.
  Read the list's FAQ if you don't understand.
 
 I believe _I_ wrote that list FAQ.
 
  The number of fancy-formatted messages is on the rise and if we don't
 nip
  this in the bud, we may find ourselves in a position where folks who
 don't
  use the latest version of $MAILCLIENT are unable to read the messages.
 I
  myself use MS Outlook 2000 but I have no right to assume what the others
 are
  using.  Hence the warning in the FAQ.
  
  This is not my first post on this topic and I'm afraid it won't be the
 last.
  I'm just trying to create awareness of the problem and I realise I
 sometimes
  have to resort to not-so-nice means to draw the subscribers' attention
 to
  it.  If I can convince one person not to use formatted messages on the
 list,
  I'll be a happy man.
 
 Awareness is created by asking KINDLY Can you please not post
 HTML-formatted messages to the mailing list more or less as you did on
 the
 25th (even though I believe that the list of offenders is so
 ridiculous).
 
 If you don't want to see HTML in messages, simply ask to get it removed by
 the mailing list owner (whops ME!), as we did on several others...
 
  I don't claim to be an all-knowing guru, but what I do know I will not
 share
  with those who are arrogant enough not to respect the rules of the list
  they're asking for help from.
 
 Ok then, try to be a little bit more polite and respectful or just shut
 up.
 
 
 
 
 One thing I can ask to you guys is, do you want me to strip HTML out of
 your
 messages and reject emails only with HTML content type? Plenary vote open
 until 11:59 PM GMT of Monday 07/30/2001.
 
 [ ] +1 - Plain Text only. Strip HTML on the mailing list.
 [ ]  0 - I don't give a damn shit.
 [ ] -1 - You mad? I love HTML in messages and want to keep using it.
 
 Thanks :)
 
 Pier



RE: VOTE: HTML in Messages and politeness (Was: Re: jdbc odbc bridge on linux)

2001-07-29 Thread Emir Alikadic (ADNOC IST)

[X] +1 - Plain Text only. Strip HTML on the mailing list.
[ ]  0 - I don't give a damn shit.
[ ] -1 - You mad? I love HTML in messages and want to keep using it.

New subscribers should be POLITELY (he he he!) directed to read the FAQ upon
subscription.