RE: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go?
Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory structure, symlinking in post-install, etc.). This is not a small task, so the RPMs may be a bit delayed as compared to how quickly they were posted in the past. And I do not believe the RPMs are built via the same build tasks that produce the other platform binaries, although that seems like a worthwhile goal to move towards if possible. Rest assured though that tomcat RPMs have not been dropped from the plans as far as I've seen, and if they have been I'll start building some. :-) Jason -Original Message- From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:01 PM To: Tomcat Users Mailing List Subject: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go? Note: This is a slightly reworded posting from yesterday. I got no response, and really wanted one. I'm reposting because I'm assuming nobody that knew saw it - and that it's so far down in the stack now they will not see it. Hi - just curious if there would be no more RPM distributions past 4.0.3. That's the last version I see one for. I rather like the RPMs myself and would like to see them continue. Did someone accidentally comment out that part of the Ant script? =) I certainly hope you all haven't decided to no longer build RPM distributions =( Anyone know what is up? Thanks! Eddie -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go?
Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory structure, symlinking in post-install, etc.). This is not a small task, so the RPMs may be a bit delayed as compared to how quickly they were posted in the past. And I do not believe the RPMs are built via the same build tasks that produce the other platform binaries, although that seems like a worthwhile goal to move towards if possible. Rest assured though that tomcat RPMs have not been dropped from the plans as far as I've seen, and if they have been I'll start building some. :-) Jason I'm working on tomcat 4.0.4 rpms, which need much more externals rpms (many from commons). That's why it take a little more times than expected -Original Message- From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:01 PM To: Tomcat Users Mailing List Subject: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go? Note: This is a slightly reworded posting from yesterday. I got no response, and really wanted one. I'm reposting because I'm assuming nobody that knew saw it - and that it's so far down in the stack now they will not see it. Hi - just curious if there would be no more RPM distributions past 4.0.3. That's the last version I see one for. I rather like the RPMs myself and would like to see them continue. Did someone accidentally comment out that part of the Ant script? =) I certainly hope you all haven't decided to no longer build RPM distributions =( Anyone know what is up? Thanks! Eddie -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go?
Thank you for the update =) I'm guessing the 4.1.x series won't start having RPM builds until they reach a full release - is that assumpiton correct? Thanks! Eddie - Original Message - From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jason Corley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go? I'm working on tomcat 4.0.4 rpms, which need much more externals rpms (many from commons). That's why it take a little more times than expected -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution of production systems??
Hi, JARs and WARs and EARs, oh my ;) A WebApplicationArchive (WAR) contains the files for a web application, e.g. servlets, JSPs, static files (html, images, libraries, etc.) and so on, as well as that web application's deployment descriptor (web.xml). An EAR typically contains more than a WAR in that it contains EJBs and their libraries, information, descriptors, etc. It may also contain other, server-specific deployment details. It is common for an EAR file to contain one or more WAR files. An EAR file will have the application descriptor, application.xml. Personally, I use Ant's WAR and EAR tasks to create those files. I'm sure other people have their favorites, as some IDEs have built-in support for this. Hope this helps, Yoav -Original Message- From: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Distribution of production systems?? I have an application that is ready to ship and uses basically servlets and JSPs. Our preferred system of choice is Tomcat/Apache, but there might be scenarios where customers would like to choose Websphere or BEA or . In this case we are considering packaging the application as a .war file and sending this accross. I tried the .war file generated with BEA yesterday and it did not work , but the same war file worked with Websphere Studio. So my question is what are the distribution methods that developers out there use to distribute their web applications. 2nd question is what are EAR files and how do they differ from WAR files. Thanks in advance. TP -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution of production systems??
Hello, Thanks for the reply. Thanks for the short explanation, I am assuming here that war is the way to go for me ;) (pardon the pun) So, that gets me to my second question, should a war created through ant or java's war utility be able to work on any application server (certified or not). because the .war i created worked on Tomcat and websphere out of the box, but did not work on weblogic. shouldnt a .war work on any application server? Please let me know your experiences. Thanks, Brown. - From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, JARs and WARs and EARs, oh my ;) A WebApplicationArchive (WAR) contains the files for a web application, e.g. servlets, JSPs, static files (html, images, libraries, etc.) and so on, as well as that web application's deployment descriptor (web.xml). An EAR typically contains more than a WAR in that it contains EJBs and their libraries, information, descriptors, etc. It may also contain other, server-specific deployment details. It is common for an EAR file to contain one or more WAR files. An EAR file will have the application descriptor, application.xml. Personally, I use Ant's WAR and EAR tasks to create those files. I'm sure other people have their favorites, as some IDEs have built-in support for this. Hope this helps, Yoav -Original Message- From: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Distribution of production systems?? I have an application that is ready to ship and uses basically servlets and JSPs. Our preferred system of choice is Tomcat/Apache, but there might be scenarios where customers would like to choose Websphere or BEA or . In this case we are considering packaging the application as a .war file and sending this accross. I tried the .war file generated with BEA yesterday and it did not work , but the same war file worked with Websphere Studio. So my question is what are the distribution methods that developers out there use to distribute their web applications. 2nd question is what are EAR files and how do they differ from WAR files. Thanks in advance. TP -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution/Licensing question
Jeff, I just noticed on Sun's Java web pages that as of the 10/17/2001 that javac and tools.jar are now redistributable. Here's a link to a page with this information: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/ - Original Message - From: Jeff Corliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Distribution/Licensing question Cool, I will check that out. Thanks! --- Brett M. Bergquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff, you need to contact Sun in regards to redistributing the Java compiler. But, you could go the route that we did and use the IBM Jikes Java compiler which is freely distributable provided that you show the proper notices and such. - Original Message - From: Jeff Corliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: Distribution/Licensing question Quick newbie question, and if its just a case of RTFM (which I have, but maybe I missed it), please feel free to say so ... I am writing a webapp that includes tag libraries and the intent is to sell this to multiple customers, each of whom will be designing their own JSPs using those tags. Now, since that means the JSPs will need to be compiled by Tomcat at least once at each customer's site, does this mean I need to actually distribute not only Tomcat but also the JDK (not just the JRE)? If that is the case, does that mean I have to make an arrangement with Sun for licensing the redistribution of the JDK? Many thanks, Jeff __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution/Licensing question
Cool, I will check that out. Thanks! --- Brett M. Bergquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff, you need to contact Sun in regards to redistributing the Java compiler. But, you could go the route that we did and use the IBM Jikes Java compiler which is freely distributable provided that you show the proper notices and such. - Original Message - From: Jeff Corliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: Distribution/Licensing question Quick newbie question, and if its just a case of RTFM (which I have, but maybe I missed it), please feel free to say so ... I am writing a webapp that includes tag libraries and the intent is to sell this to multiple customers, each of whom will be designing their own JSPs using those tags. Now, since that means the JSPs will need to be compiled by Tomcat at least once at each customer's site, does this mean I need to actually distribute not only Tomcat but also the JDK (not just the JRE)? If that is the case, does that mean I have to make an arrangement with Sun for licensing the redistribution of the JDK? Many thanks, Jeff __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution/Licensing question
Jeff, you need to contact Sun in regards to redistributing the Java compiler. But, you could go the route that we did and use the IBM Jikes Java compiler which is freely distributable provided that you show the proper notices and such. - Original Message - From: Jeff Corliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: Distribution/Licensing question Quick newbie question, and if its just a case of RTFM (which I have, but maybe I missed it), please feel free to say so ... I am writing a webapp that includes tag libraries and the intent is to sell this to multiple customers, each of whom will be designing their own JSPs using those tags. Now, since that means the JSPs will need to be compiled by Tomcat at least once at each customer's site, does this mean I need to actually distribute not only Tomcat but also the JDK (not just the JRE)? If that is the case, does that mean I have to make an arrangement with Sun for licensing the redistribution of the JDK? Many thanks, Jeff __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: distribution
Knoll, Craig wrote: In the binary distribution folders, there are several files. I know I need jakarta-tomcat-3.2.3.zip but what is jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3.zip used for? Do I need this file in conjunction with Tomcat? Is it for JSP? No. Is the usage of this file documented? After you unarchive this file, take a look at jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3/docs/index.html. I believe this is the source for Tomcat servlet.jar. Tomcat is an application server for the methods/functions contained in the servlet.jar. Um, can anyone else come up with a better explanation? Like St. Augustine, I know what it is until you ask me to explain it. :) -- John Alex Hebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Engineer
RE: distribution
It's servlet api docs. Or at least that's what my cursory look said it was. --mikej -=- mike jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Hebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: distribution Knoll, Craig wrote: In the binary distribution folders, there are several files. I know I need jakarta-tomcat-3.2.3.zip but what is jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3.zip used for? Do I need this file in conjunction with Tomcat? Is it for JSP? No. Is the usage of this file documented? After you unarchive this file, take a look at jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3/docs/index.html. I believe this is the source for Tomcat servlet.jar. Tomcat is an application server for the methods/functions contained in the servlet.jar. Um, can anyone else come up with a better explanation? Like St. Augustine, I know what it is until you ask me to explain it. :) -- John Alex Hebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Engineer
Re: distribution
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Knoll, Craig wrote: In the binary distribution folders, there are several files. I know I need jakarta-tomcat-3.2.3.zip but what is jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3.zip used for? Do I need this file in conjunction with Tomcat? Is it for JSP? Is the usage of this file documented? The jakarta-servletapi-3.2.3 zip contains the sources and Javadocs for the servlet API classes. You don't need it unless you want them (or unless you are building Tomcat from sources), because the 3.2.3 binary distribution includes the servlet.jar file built from these classes. Thanks. Craig Craig McClanahan
