Re: Does the "isThreadSafe" page directive work in Tomcat 5.0.18?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:57:26PM -0800, Josh Rehman wrote: : I changed this directive to "false" and looked at the generated servlet. : I was expecting to see that it implements "SingleThreadModel" but there : was no change to the generated servlet code. Have I missed something? Tomcat5 is a servlet spec 2.4 / JSP spec 2.0 container. Those specs deprecate SingleThreadModel and isThreadSafe, respectively. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does the "isThreadSafe" page directive work in Tomcat 5.0.18?
Damn, I've been reading the JSP 1.2 spec for some reason. Thanks. Would it be a good idea for Tomcat to print out a warning about this deprecation? QM wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:57:26PM -0800, Josh Rehman wrote: : I changed this directive to "false" and looked at the generated servlet. : I was expecting to see that it implements "SingleThreadModel" but there : was no change to the generated servlet code. Have I missed something? Tomcat5 is a servlet spec 2.4 / JSP spec 2.0 container. Those specs deprecate SingleThreadModel and isThreadSafe, respectively. -QM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does the "isThreadSafe" page directive work in Tomcat 5.0.18?
: Would it be a good idea for Tomcat to print out a warning about this : deprecation? Not my say -- I'm neither on Sun's board for specs, nor a Tomcat developer. ;) Seriously, though: this is an issue that could argued either way, so my guess is that the Tomcat crew decided in favor of the one way and that's how it turned out. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
