Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-20 Thread satou hotmail
Hello,


 Hello All,
 Today I tired to port my application which was running fine on Redhat 8 
 to redhat 9. My Application
 spawns multiple threads. What I found interesting was thread were not 
 behaving as they were supposed to.
 I am not sure do I have to do anything special about RedHat 9? Please 
 let me know if some one have any clue.
 santos


RedHat9 is not considered that thread is process.
But RedHat8 and RedHat7.x is thread is process.

If you perform  ps -m ,Your problem will be solved.



This issue(Redhat7-8)
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2002/11/07/linux_threads.html


*
Diasuke Sato
http://www.opentone.co.jp

-- 
satou hotmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread Darian Shimy
What were you expecting to happen?  What JDK versions were in 8 and 9 (java
-version)? 

 -Original Message-
 From: Santos Jha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:33 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RedHat 9  tomcat
 
 
 Hello All,
 Today I tired to port my application which was running fine 
 on Redhat 8 to redhat 9. My Application spawns multiple 
 threads. What I found interesting was thread were not 
 behaving as they were supposed to.
 I am not sure do I have to do anything special about RedHat 
 9? Please let me know if some one have any clue.
 santos
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread Tim Funk
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10650119334r=1w=2 might help.

-Tim

Santos Jha wrote:

Hello All,
Today I tired to port my application which was running fine on Redhat 8 
to redhat 9. My Application
spawns multiple threads. What I found interesting was thread were not 
behaving as they were supposed to.
I am not sure do I have to do anything special about RedHat 9? Please 
let me know if some one have any clue.
santos
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread Santos Jha
basically I have a singleton which has a synchronized method. I was 
expecting that each thread that access this method will be able to 
complete it without getting pre emptied. From my log I can see such 
thing does not exist.

I tried to use sun's jdk 1.4.2 and I also used IBM jdk 1.4 when I could 
not get the desired result.
santos

Darian Shimy wrote:

What were you expecting to happen?  What JDK versions were in 8 and 9 (java
-version)? 

 

-Original Message-
From: Santos Jha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RedHat 9  tomcat

Hello All,
Today I tired to port my application which was running fine 
on Redhat 8 to redhat 9. My Application spawns multiple 
threads. What I found interesting was thread were not 
behaving as they were supposed to.
I am not sure do I have to do anything special about RedHat 
9? Please let me know if some one have any clue.
santos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 




Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread Chong Yu Meng
Red Hat 9 uses the New Posix Thread Library (NPTL), and has been known 
to even break some Java SDK's (for example, if you're using IBM's Java 2 
SDK 1.3.1, you'll need to put in an environment variable 
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 or you'll get a segmentation fault). I know I'll 
probably get flamed for this, but, if there is no compelling reason to 
upgrade to RH9, you really shouldn't.

pascal chong

Santos Jha wrote:

basically I have a singleton which has a synchronized method. I was 
expecting that each thread that access this method will be able to 
complete it without getting pre emptied. From my log I can see such 
thing does not exist.

I tried to use sun's jdk 1.4.2 and I also used IBM jdk 1.4 when I 
could not get the desired result.
santos

Darian Shimy wrote:

What were you expecting to happen?  What JDK versions were in 8 and 9 
(java
-version)?
 

-Original Message-
From: Santos Jha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 
November 17, 2003 4:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RedHat 9  tomcat

Hello All,
Today I tired to port my application which was running fine on 
Redhat 8 to redhat 9. My Application spawns multiple threads. What I 
found interesting was thread were not behaving as they were supposed 
to.
I am not sure do I have to do anything special about RedHat 9? 
Please let me know if some one have any clue.
santos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
Santos,
basically I have a singleton which has a synchronized method. I was 
expecting that each thread that access this method will be able to 
complete it without getting pre emptied. From my log I can see such 
thing does not exist.
So, are you saying that you can observe two threads in the same 
synchronized block at the same time? How can you see that?

Can you post some code?

-chris

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RedHat 9 tomcat

2003-11-17 Thread satou hotmail
RedHat9 is not considered that thread is process.
But RedHat8 and RedHat7.x is thread is process.

If you perform  ps -m ,Your problem will be solved.


This issue(Redhat7-8)

http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2002/11/07/linux_threads.html

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:36:32 -0500
Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Santos,
  basically I have a singleton which has a synchronized method. I was 
  expecting that each thread that access this method will be able to 
  complete it without getting pre emptied. From my log I can see such 
  thing does not exist.
 
 So, are you saying that you can observe two threads in the same 
 synchronized block at the same time? How can you see that?
 
 Can you post some code?
 
 -chris
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
satou hotmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]