RE: handling of Unicode still broken in 4.1.24
You could try setting your file.encoding system property. That might help. Sun changed the default value for this property in JDK1.4 On *nix systems it changed from ISO-8859-1 to ASCII. Andy -Original Message- From: Carole Mah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 March 2003 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: handling of Unicode still broken in 4.1.24 Hello, I've been using Tomcat 4.0.6 for some time now, because neither 4.1.12 nor 4.1.18 handled my Unicode correctly. When 4.1.18 came out, my co-worker Paul Caton posted to this list asking for help on this issue. I had supposed by now the issue would have been solved, so I cheerily and with much anticipation installed 4.1.24. However, the unicode handling is still bad in 4.1.24, so we are sticking with 4.0.6. We're wondering if this issue is going to be addressed in future releases. I am willing to send the actual URLs of the tomcat servers on which the test documents reside to any developer who wants them, but I'd rather not post those URLs to the public at large. I can also send any jsp code, xsl stylesheets, Xinclude stuff, etc. In lieu of that here, I'll just give the URLs of two comparative screenshots to show the differences in the Unicode handling: bad: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.1.24.jpg good: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.0.6.jpg Thank you very much for any help with this! -carole -- Carole E. Mah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer/Analyst Brown University Computing & Information Services Academic Technology Services Scholarly Technology Group phn 401-863-2669 fax 401-863-9313 http://www.stg.brown.edu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: handling of Unicode still broken in 4.1.24
Post a bug to bugzilla... http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ Or, if one already exists there, comment on that and raise the priority. Jake At 12:19 PM 3/26/2003 -0500, you wrote: Hello, I've been using Tomcat 4.0.6 for some time now, because neither 4.1.12 nor 4.1.18 handled my Unicode correctly. When 4.1.18 came out, my co-worker Paul Caton posted to this list asking for help on this issue. I had supposed by now the issue would have been solved, so I cheerily and with much anticipation installed 4.1.24. However, the unicode handling is still bad in 4.1.24, so we are sticking with 4.0.6. We're wondering if this issue is going to be addressed in future releases. I am willing to send the actual URLs of the tomcat servers on which the test documents reside to any developer who wants them, but I'd rather not post those URLs to the public at large. I can also send any jsp code, xsl stylesheets, Xinclude stuff, etc. In lieu of that here, I'll just give the URLs of two comparative screenshots to show the differences in the Unicode handling: bad: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.1.24.jpg good: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.0.6.jpg Thank you very much for any help with this! -carole -- Carole E. Mah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer/Analyst Brown University Computing & Information Services Academic Technology Services Scholarly Technology Group phn 401-863-2669 fax 401-863-9313 http://www.stg.brown.edu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
handling of Unicode still broken in 4.1.24
Hello, I've been using Tomcat 4.0.6 for some time now, because neither 4.1.12 nor 4.1.18 handled my Unicode correctly. When 4.1.18 came out, my co-worker Paul Caton posted to this list asking for help on this issue. I had supposed by now the issue would have been solved, so I cheerily and with much anticipation installed 4.1.24. However, the unicode handling is still bad in 4.1.24, so we are sticking with 4.0.6. We're wondering if this issue is going to be addressed in future releases. I am willing to send the actual URLs of the tomcat servers on which the test documents reside to any developer who wants them, but I'd rather not post those URLs to the public at large. I can also send any jsp code, xsl stylesheets, Xinclude stuff, etc. In lieu of that here, I'll just give the URLs of two comparative screenshots to show the differences in the Unicode handling: bad: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.1.24.jpg good: http://dev.stg.brown.edu/screenshots/acsam-4.0.6.jpg Thank you very much for any help with this! -carole -- Carole E. Mah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer/Analyst Brown University Computing & Information Services Academic Technology Services Scholarly Technology Group phn 401-863-2669 fax 401-863-9313 http://www.stg.brown.edu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]