On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:49 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Magnus Manske wrote:
>> I understand that, and I didn't say lfs was better (it has plenty of
>> its own quirks), or that SGE was a bad choice - it seems to run well
>> enough, all things considered. It's just that things like "SGE might
>> interpret comments in your scripts as commands and die" or "you can't
>> run qsub from within qsub" are types of behaviour that are unusual to
>> say the least, and the toolserver users are left to the mercy of these
>> issues (I'd call them bugs) without warning or documentation. (Yes,
>> there is a wiki pages that says it can interpret special comments in
>> your script. That's somewhat different from "it will reinterpret your
>> Perl script and fall over").
>
> Having learned some lessons today, you should write improved documentation
> on the wiki. :-)
I might, once I've recovered from said "learning" experience...
Magnus
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
