Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
Bryan Tong Minh wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Platonides wrote: >> >> Also, as discussed with Ariel, I will gladly mirror such dumps at wm-es >> web space. >> > You do have a toolserver account right? I think it would be a good > idea if you could copy the dumps from the TS to your web space. I don't. But I can request one if needed. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Platonides wrote: > > Also, as discussed with Ariel, I will gladly mirror such dumps at wm-es > web space. > You do have a toolserver account right? I think it would be a good idea if you could copy the dumps from the TS to your web space. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (Removing wikitech-l cc since I'm not subscribed there.) Platonides: > Roan Kattouw wrote: > > 2010/11/26 Bryan Tong Minh : > >> Somehow I think that publishing an entire dump violates the "do not > >> publish significant parts of an article" rule. > > Surely the toolserver admins could be asked to consider waiving that > > in this case considering the public nature of the dumps and the > > downtime situation with download.wm.o > It's not that toolserver admins are excentric adding such rule, but an > issue of WM-DE liability if such information is published. This is correct -- the rule applies to any article text, even articles already available on Wikimedia foundation-run websites. (Otherwise, there would be no point having the rule at all, since *all* text on the Toolserver is also available on the site itself.) - river. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzwVCMACgkQIXd7fCuc5vIx7QCfVRkyskknRHUkhzhraaJOV+z3 PwwAn0dVwRv3hGcjWpxTvD4PSQn7fJFQ =MfZC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
Oh, but I was reading that page from the beginnig. It still doesn't give any predictions of time point when it will work again. M ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
Михајло Анђелковић wrote: > I do not see the dump of srwiki in the given directory. Is there any > clue when they might be available again on dumps.wikimedia.org? > > M You can follow the story here: http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Dataset1#11-10-2010_-_New_errors This was expected to be fixed already, but the process of fixing the server is struck at one point after another. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] alternative way to get wikipedia dump while server is down
Roan Kattouw wrote: > 2010/11/26 Bryan Tong Minh : >> Somehow I think that publishing an entire dump violates the "do not >> publish significant parts of an article" rule. >> > Surely the toolserver admins could be asked to consider waiving that > in this case considering the public nature of the dumps and the > downtime situation with download.wm.o > > Roan Kattouw (Catrope) It's not that toolserver admins are excentric adding such rule, but an issue of WM-DE liability if such information is published. However, I think that providing such file to just a few selected people would be acceptable. Also, as discussed with Ariel, I will gladly mirror such dumps at wm-es web space. ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
