Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread W2XJ
There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on 
electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it is 
common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating element 
and open the connection to float that element. This is the practice in 
commercial directional arrays where some tower are not used in a day or 
night mode.  This does not work well on taller towers and I do not know 
offhand how it would work with the T. It is easy enough to model in EZNEC.

On 6/16/12 3:02 PM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
 OK, several folks came back and recommended detuning my transmit antenna in 
 receive.

 Certainly any receive antenna I have is going to be in the shadow of my 
 transmit antenna, a 130-foot flat-top about 85 feet up, fed against ground. 
 (Really it's an 80 meter doublet fed with ladder line. I tie the ladder line 
 together at the bottom and feed against ground.)

 Trying to figure out what detune is.

 I match the transmit antenna to 50 ohm coax with a L network at the bottom. 
 If I want to detune, then I can open up the connection between the 
 antenna and the L network at the bottom? Unhook the L or C in the L network? 
 Short out the antenna where it comes into the L network? I could rig up a 
 relay contact to do any of those.

 Tim N3QE
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Receiving loops

2012-06-17 Thread W2XJ
Sensitivity is not always important. Small loops in general receive less 
noise and the real exercise is balancing the internal noise floor 
against the actual signal received. In some cases a loss up to 20 db can 
be acceptable the numbers are easy enough to run.

On 6/16/12 8:17 PM, Brian Miller wrote:
 Hi Tim

 I also agree with the previous comments on this thread about detuning the
 transmit antenna (or any other wires/cables that are resonant on 160M) and
 isolating the coax feed line from the RX loop.

 It is also important to identify the direction of the main source of the
 noise and orientate the loop accordingly so that is being properly nulled. I
 use a small portable tuned loop to identify the direction of the noise..

 Of course, if the noise is coming from the same direction as the DX then you
 are not going to see much (or any ) improvement in the signal-to-noise
 ratio. Also, if the noise sources are in multiple directions then it will
 also be difficult to null the noise properly. I have found that small tuned
 loops (with their bidirectional nulls) are often more effective in such a
 situation.

 One of the problems with small tuned loops made from wire is their low
 sensitivity. Rather than using a pre-amp you can boost the output by making
 the loop larger (e.g., a circumference of 0.1 wavelength or even larger).
 The larger loop maintains a directional pattern similar to the smaller one
 but also exhibits a higher radiation radiation resistance and hence lower
 losses.

 Good luck with the experiments and let us know how you get on.

 73, Brian VK3MI ZL1AZE

 From: tsho...@wmata.com
 To: topband@contesting.com
 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:28:38 +
 Subject: Topband: Receiving loops

 I want to try a new receiving antenna for the summer Stew Perry. Last
 winter was my first foray onto 160M and I really felt like an alligator. I
 could work everyone I could hear, with just 100W. I think that means I
 need a better receive antenna. If you look at my score in the winter Stew
 Perry I think I did great QSO-number wise, but my average distance was
 very poor, I'm guessing typical alligator.

 I have tried pennants and K9AY's over the winter with little success.
 Compared to my transmitting antenna (A T with a poor radial system) most
 signals were still better, S/N wise, on my transmitting antenna. I feel
 like I must've been doing something wrong. Still the fact that a few
 signals came in on the loop with by ear much better S/N, maybe I was on
 the right track and just didn't try hard enough.

 I will be trying a small tuned magnetic loop tonight (e.g. the last one at
 http://www.w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm with the 9:1 transformer)
 . And maybe a terminated beverage but I'm limited to about 150'... well
 maybe I could run something longer down the driveway as long as I clean it
 up before the sun comes up and the neighbors see.

 I was fairly impressed with small tuned magnetic loops when I was doing
 some BCB DX'ing several years ago. I wasn't comparing with beverages or
 anything.

 Tim N3QE
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: full wave horiz loop

2012-06-17 Thread W2XJ
EZNEC is your friend.

On 6/16/12 9:35 PM, Tom W2MN wrote:
 A couple of us in the radio club were discussing the possibility of
 installing a full wave horizontal loop antenna (for Rx and Tx) on top of a
 building we have access to. The loop would be about 20ft above the building
 roof, making it about 100ft above ground. The loop could be a rectangle
 approx. 180ft x 110ft (adjusted for a full wavelength on 160m). We were
 thinking of using it on 160m as well as 80m. We would use steel / copper
 clad wire and there in NO possibility of support except at the corners; so
 it will sag under its own weight.



 Would appreciate any comments concerning its usefulness. Is it going to be
 worth the effort??



 Tom

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Receiving loops

2012-06-17 Thread W2PM
Receiving antennas are about directivity, not sensitivity. That is the best way 
to reduce noise although a very small antenna can change the signal to noise 
ratio without being directional. 

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 17, 2012, at 11:16, W2XJ w...@nyc.rr.com wrote:

 Sensitivity is not always important. Small loops in general receive less 
 noise and the real exercise is balancing the internal noise floor 
 against the actual signal received. In some cases a loss up to 20 db can 
 be acceptable the numbers are easy enough to run.
 
 On 6/16/12 8:17 PM, Brian Miller wrote:
 Hi Tim
 
 I also agree with the previous comments on this thread about detuning the
 transmit antenna (or any other wires/cables that are resonant on 160M) and
 isolating the coax feed line from the RX loop.
 
 It is also important to identify the direction of the main source of the
 noise and orientate the loop accordingly so that is being properly nulled. I
 use a small portable tuned loop to identify the direction of the noise..
 
 Of course, if the noise is coming from the same direction as the DX then you
 are not going to see much (or any ) improvement in the signal-to-noise
 ratio. Also, if the noise sources are in multiple directions then it will
 also be difficult to null the noise properly. I have found that small tuned
 loops (with their bidirectional nulls) are often more effective in such a
 situation.
 
 One of the problems with small tuned loops made from wire is their low
 sensitivity. Rather than using a pre-amp you can boost the output by making
 the loop larger (e.g., a circumference of 0.1 wavelength or even larger).
 The larger loop maintains a directional pattern similar to the smaller one
 but also exhibits a higher radiation radiation resistance and hence lower
 losses.
 
 Good luck with the experiments and let us know how you get on.
 
 73, Brian VK3MI ZL1AZE
 
 From: tsho...@wmata.com
 To: topband@contesting.com
 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:28:38 +
 Subject: Topband: Receiving loops
 
 I want to try a new receiving antenna for the summer Stew Perry. Last
 winter was my first foray onto 160M and I really felt like an alligator. I
 could work everyone I could hear, with just 100W. I think that means I
 need a better receive antenna. If you look at my score in the winter Stew
 Perry I think I did great QSO-number wise, but my average distance was
 very poor, I'm guessing typical alligator.
 
 I have tried pennants and K9AY's over the winter with little success.
 Compared to my transmitting antenna (A T with a poor radial system) most
 signals were still better, S/N wise, on my transmitting antenna. I feel
 like I must've been doing something wrong. Still the fact that a few
 signals came in on the loop with by ear much better S/N, maybe I was on
 the right track and just didn't try hard enough.
 
 I will be trying a small tuned magnetic loop tonight (e.g. the last one at
 http://www.w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm with the 9:1 transformer)
 . And maybe a terminated beverage but I'm limited to about 150'... well
 maybe I could run something longer down the driveway as long as I clean it
 up before the sun comes up and the neighbors see.
 
 I was fairly impressed with small tuned magnetic loops when I was doing
 some BCB DX'ing several years ago. I wasn't comparing with beverages or
 anything.
 
 Tim N3QE
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread ZR
If its RF that is a concern the only positive method would be feeding it 
into a 50/75 Ohm resistor when transmitting.

I had to do that some years ago when a Beverage ran between the phased 
vertical pair and after cooking a few parts in a TS-940. Beverages are now 
well away from any TX antennas.

Carl
KM1H




- Original Message - 
From: W2XJ w...@nyc.rr.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive


 There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on
 electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it is
 common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating element
 and open the connection to float that element. This is the practice in
 commercial directional arrays where some tower are not used in a day or
 night mode.  This does not work well on taller towers and I do not know
 offhand how it would work with the T. It is easy enough to model in EZNEC.

 On 6/16/12 3:02 PM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
 OK, several folks came back and recommended detuning my transmit antenna 
 in receive.

 Certainly any receive antenna I have is going to be in the shadow of my 
 transmit antenna, a 130-foot flat-top about 85 feet up, fed against 
 ground. (Really it's an 80 meter doublet fed with ladder line. I tie the 
 ladder line together at the bottom and feed against ground.)

 Trying to figure out what detune is.

 I match the transmit antenna to 50 ohm coax with a L network at the 
 bottom. If I want to detune, then I can open up the connection 
 between the antenna and the L network at the bottom? Unhook the L or C in 
 the L network? Short out the antenna where it comes into the L network? I 
 could rig up a relay contact to do any of those.

 Tim N3QE
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12
 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: golden ear award

2012-06-17 Thread w7dra
 NO3M, 2,136 miles away from my station, after about 30 repeats correctly
received my call and message.

An operating technique usually not spoken of, is not transmitting back
until everything is correctly or (thought correctly) received.

I first was aware of this technique when i was operating from a BB in
Canterbury as M/W7DRA/P. 

An HA3 (I can't remember the whole call) sent a ? and about 5 minutes
later of me sending my call in groups of 3 he got my call correct, and
then we started on the message.

this technique flies in the face of the Rate King (or maybe it should be
called the rate monkey on my back?)

Once an acknowledgement is made, a  super human effort is put forth to
complete the contact

Thanks to the wisdom of the QRZ locator, I see the summer stew station to
station mileage distance for my 8 contacts.


2136, 825, 633, 293, 220, 119, 111, 12.

mike w7dra

53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4fde0ad8d798c60932fst04vuc
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Stew Perry Log Submittal

2012-06-17 Thread DGB
I've been trying to submit my log to t...@contesting.com as specified in 
the rules.

It keeps getting rejected ... is it such that they don't want the logs 
from the warm-ups?

73 Dwight NS9I
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Stew Perry Log Submittal

2012-06-17 Thread Tree
Naw - nothing that sinister.  I was going to get to this before the contest
- but life events sort of overtook my free time and I didn't get to it.
QRX a few days (which is why you didn't hear K7RAT on this time).  We'll
get it fixed.

Tree

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:10 AM, DGB ns9i2...@bayland.net wrote:

 I've been trying to submit my log to t...@contesting.com as specified in
 the rules.

 It keeps getting rejected ... is it such that they don't want the logs
 from the warm-ups?

 73 Dwight NS9I
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Receiving loops

2012-06-17 Thread Arthur Delibert

Thanks.  I wasn't referring to a magnetic loop that uses the shield for pickup. 
 I was referring to the outer shield on the coax that runs from any antenna to 
the shack.  If you use an antenna that was chosen for its specific directional 
and/or low-noise properties, and you don't isolate that antenna from the outer 
shield of the feedline, the shield itself becomes part of the antenna, spoils 
the directionality and picks up additional noise. Art DelibertKB3FJO
  From: w...@aol.com
 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:52:38 -0400
 To: radio7...@msn.com
 CC: topband@contesting.com; tsho...@wmata.com
 Subject: Re: Topband: Receiving loops
 
 If you are referring to a magnetic loop the problem is not the pickup from 
 the shield - that is the conductor for picking up the signals - all signals 
 including noise. The issue with a magnetic loop would be imbalance and that 
 would be due to improper construction where the sides of the loop either way 
 of the gap would not be equal or how you connect or install the tuning 
 capacitor. Close proximity to a conducting surface would also affect the 
 directivity. But even with a poorly constructed mag loop you should still get 
 the null but it may not be symetrical or as deep as it should be. 
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Jun 16, 2012, at 10:36, Arthur Delibert radio7...@msn.com wrote:
 
  
  Tim -- If the suggestions from others don't entirely do the trick, here's 
  another thing to consider:  The outer conductor on your coax might be 
  picking up local noise and/or destroying the pattern of your receiving 
  antenna.  I DX the AM broadcast band with whatever antennas I can fit into 
  my suburban backyard.  I was getting poor results with a pennant until I 
  put Radio Works T-4 line isolators at both ends of the coax.  Suddenly the 
  antenna began to behave as expected. Hope this helps. Art DelibertKB3FJO
  From: tsho...@wmata.com
  To: topband@contesting.com
  Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:28:38 +
  Subject: Topband: Receiving loops
  
  I want to try a new receiving antenna for the summer Stew Perry. Last 
  winter was my first foray onto 160M and I really felt like an alligator. I 
  could work everyone I could hear, with just 100W. I think that means I 
  need a better receive antenna. If you look at my score in the winter Stew 
  Perry I think I did great QSO-number wise, but my average distance was 
  very poor, I'm guessing typical alligator.
  
  I have tried pennants and K9AY's over the winter with little success. 
  Compared to my transmitting antenna (A T with a poor radial system) most 
  signals were still better, S/N wise, on my transmitting antenna. I feel 
  like I must've been doing something wrong. Still the fact that a few 
  signals came in on the loop with by ear much better S/N, maybe I was on 
  the right track and just didn't try hard enough.
  
  I will be trying a small tuned magnetic loop tonight (e.g. the last one at 
  http://www.w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm with the 9:1 transformer) 
  . And maybe a terminated beverage but I'm limited to about 150'... well 
  maybe I could run something longer down the driveway as long as I clean it 
  up before the sun comes up and the neighbors see.
  
  I was fairly impressed with small tuned magnetic loops when I was doing 
  some BCB DX'ing several years ago. I wasn't comparing with beverages or 
  anything.
  
  Tim N3QE
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
  
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
  
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Stew Perry Log Submittal

2012-06-17 Thread Gary and Kathleen Pearse
I actually did bang away at the key off and on for a couple last eve after 
midnight...nothing heard or worked. Receiving loop, and flat-top 80 M dipole at 
70' with the twin-lead shorted and fed against elevated radials. Perpetual 
daylight in Interior Alaska may have had some effect. That, and no relatively 
close Rat ops or locals led to a slow eve. 

It's been 47 years since I've seen stars during a June summer's eve. That's KL7 
for you at BP64.

73, Gary NL7Y

 Naw - nothing that sinister.  I was going to get to this before the contest
 - but life events sort of overtook my free time and I didn't get to it.
 QRX a few days (which is why you didn't hear K7RAT on this time).  We'll
 get it fixed.
 
 Tree
 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread Bob K6UJ
I am very interested in this subject, I am trying to figure out how to detune 
my 160 inverted L.I am using a flag antenna for receive and unfortunately
it is only about 50 feet from the base of the L.By itself the flag works 
very  well at reducing the local electrical noise, (which luckily it is coming 
from only one direction)
When the L is strung up it the flag is useless,  it reradiates the noise like 
mad.   I'm hoping to learn more solutions on detuning xmit antennas during 
receive from the group.  
Wouldn't it be nice if all we had to do was ground the feedline to the xmit 
antenna during receive ?   sigh   I guess the idea is to 
make the xmit antenna non resonant anywhere near 
the operating freq during receive.   

Bob
K6UJ 

On Jun 17, 2012, at 8:03 AM, W2XJ wrote:

 There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on 
 electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it is 
 common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating element 
 and open the connection to float that element. This is the practice in 
 commercial directional arrays where some tower are not used in a day or 
 night mode.  This does not work well on taller towers and I do not know 
 offhand how it would work with the T. It is easy enough to model in EZNEC.
 
 On 6/16/12 3:02 PM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
 OK, several folks came back and recommended detuning my transmit antenna in 
 receive.
 
 Certainly any receive antenna I have is going to be in the shadow of my 
 transmit antenna, a 130-foot flat-top about 85 feet up, fed against ground. 
 (Really it's an 80 meter doublet fed with ladder line. I tie the ladder line 
 together at the bottom and feed against ground.)
 
 Trying to figure out what detune is.
 
 I match the transmit antenna to 50 ohm coax with a L network at the bottom. 
 If I want to detune, then I can open up the connection between the 
 antenna and the L network at the bottom? Unhook the L or C in the L network? 
 Short out the antenna where it comes into the L network? I could rig up a 
 relay contact to do any of those.
 
 Tim N3QE
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread wb6rse1
My tower shunt feed for 160 and 80 is latching relay remote controlled. On 160, 
certain orientations of my very close RX flag result in reduced signal due to 
the influence of the tuned vertical. In those instances, I detune the shunt 
by selecting 80m. My amp has a rather dramatic way of reminding me if I fail to 
switch the shunt back to 160 when transmitting.

Just one station's solution.

73 - Steve WB6RSE

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING

2012-06-17 Thread Bill and Liz
I have been following the thread with interest.  I have a K9AY and a DO loop 
located within 60 to 75 ft of the TX vertical at our summer home. 
Interestingly, I find both these antennas very quiet with no sign of noise 
being coupled to them via the TX antenna.  I work a lot of DX from this 
location on topband using these loops as well as a pair of Beverages, both 
of which also pass fairly close to my TX vertical and both of which are very 
quiet.

So, why am I not hearing this noise many are experiencing?  The TX vertical 
is a 60 ft toploaded affair and I do not de-tune it on receive.  All I have 
done is to run all the feedlines for both RX antennas and the TX vertical 
underground in different conduits to a remote switching location.  Someone 
please tell me why I am missing out on all the fun of having noise on my RX 
antennas.

Bill, VE3CSK 



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING

2012-06-17 Thread W2XJ
Probably part has to do with the fact that your vertical is 1/8 
wavelength and rule of thumb is 1/8 wavelength or less do no have a 
significant influence unless extremely close.

On 6/17/12 5:34 PM, Bill and Liz wrote:
 I have been following the thread with interest.  I have a K9AY and a DO loop
 located within 60 to 75 ft of the TX vertical at our summer home.
 Interestingly, I find both these antennas very quiet with no sign of noise
 being coupled to them via the TX antenna.  I work a lot of DX from this
 location on topband using these loops as well as a pair of Beverages, both
 of which also pass fairly close to my TX vertical and both of which are very
 quiet.

 So, why am I not hearing this noise many are experiencing?  The TX vertical
 is a 60 ft toploaded affair and I do not de-tune it on receive.  All I have
 done is to run all the feedlines for both RX antennas and the TX vertical
 underground in different conduits to a remote switching location.  Someone
 please tell me why I am missing out on all the fun of having noise on my RX
 antennas.

 Bill, VE3CSK



 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING

2012-06-17 Thread ZR
Sounds like a 1/4 wave vertical to me if its toploaded enough to resonate.

Do the radials pass over or under the Beverage?

Carl
KM1H


Carl
KM1H

- Original Message - 
From: W2XJ w...@nyc.rr.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING


 Probably part has to do with the fact that your vertical is 1/8
 wavelength and rule of thumb is 1/8 wavelength or less do no have a
 significant influence unless extremely close.

 On 6/17/12 5:34 PM, Bill and Liz wrote:
 I have been following the thread with interest.  I have a K9AY and a DO 
 loop
 located within 60 to 75 ft of the TX vertical at our summer home.
 Interestingly, I find both these antennas very quiet with no sign of 
 noise
 being coupled to them via the TX antenna.  I work a lot of DX from this
 location on topband using these loops as well as a pair of Beverages, 
 both
 of which also pass fairly close to my TX vertical and both of which are 
 very
 quiet.

 So, why am I not hearing this noise many are experiencing?  The TX 
 vertical
 is a 60 ft toploaded affair and I do not de-tune it on receive.  All I 
 have
 done is to run all the feedlines for both RX antennas and the TX vertical
 underground in different conduits to a remote switching location. 
 Someone
 please tell me why I am missing out on all the fun of having noise on my 
 RX
 antennas.

 Bill, VE3CSK



 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12
 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Summer Stew Results...

2012-06-17 Thread Jim F.
I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max.
 
Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who copied 
W1FMR/QRP. 
I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com and his 1/4 
wave 
vertical.
 
Stations that copied my 5w. signal:
 
 
K2TTT    234.4 mi 
W6XR    277.7 mi 
K1GQ    38.7 mi 
NO3M    452.5 mi 
VE3TA    465.5 mi 
K1ZO  71.0 mi 
K2CBI    192.0 mi 
VE9HF    292.7 mi 
W2XL 180.2 mi 
AB1OD  118.5 mi 
W3GH    477.1 mi 
N4IS     1287.8 mi 
N4PN    986.7 mi 
VE3OSZ    284.2 mi 
K1LT      650.0 mi 
N3QE    427.0 mi 
K7CS    438.5 mi 
 
  TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials
and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP.
 
73,
 
Jim / W1FMR - NH
 
 
 
 
 
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING

2012-06-17 Thread N4IS
Hi Bill

The resonance element reradiate noise and also the signal. If you think
about why a yagi works, all elements reradiate the signal from the driven
elements, but what about on reception, . It is the same. All resonate
elements reradiate. Any resonant structure does the same.

Here detuning the TX antenna droops the noise by 2 S units on the RX noise.



So, why am I not hearing this noise many are experiencing?


Noise does no add because it is incoherent, so when you remove one layer you
hear start hearing the second layer, there is always noise. But you can hear
only to predominant noise the strong one.

Detuning a tower is no easy, NX4D 90 FT vertical with top hat is insulated
from the ground, Doug was using one vacuum relay to disconnect the tower
from the feed line, Doug did it in 2007 however last year he decided to tune
a wire tapped 30 FT on the tower, the wire was there because he used to
shunt feed the tower. Doug used a capacitor to tune the wire like W8JI
explain on his website, guess what, 2 S units down on the noise floor. Now
is WF has a really deep null on the sides and RX is much better.

On Doug's case some capacitance or something was not right, end even using a
detuning relay and floating the tower was not enough to detune the
structure,

How far the tower can detune your RX antenna,? Well it is easy to see it
using EZNEC, one wave far is not enough and on 160m it is over  500ft away.


Regards

Jose Carlos
N4IS

  




-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5075 - Release Date: 06/17/12

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
The easy way to do that is with a relay between the coax center conductor
and the L wire at the feedpoint. When the relay is open, that makes the L a
1/4 wave on 160 which is not self-resonant.  The quarter wave is only
resonant in conjunction with whatever counterpoise you are using for the L.
  73, Guy.

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Bob K6UJ k...@pacbell.net wrote:

 I am very interested in this subject, I am trying to figure out how to
 detune my 160 inverted L.I am using a flag antenna for receive and
 unfortunately
 it is only about 50 feet from the base of the L.By itself the flag
 works very  well at reducing the local electrical noise, (which luckily it
 is coming from only one direction)
 When the L is strung up it the flag is useless,  it reradiates the noise
 like mad.   I'm hoping to learn more solutions on detuning xmit antennas
 during receive from the group.
 Wouldn't it be nice if all we had to do was ground the feedline to the
 xmit antenna during receive ?   sigh   I guess the idea
 is to make the xmit antenna non resonant anywhere near
 the operating freq during receive.

 Bob
 K6UJ

 On Jun 17, 2012, at 8:03 AM, W2XJ wrote:

  There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on
  electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it is
  common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating element
  and open the connection to float that element. This is the practice in
  commercial directional arrays where some tower are not used in a day or
  night mode.  This does not work well on taller towers and I do not know
  offhand how it would work with the T. It is easy enough to model in
 EZNEC.
 
  On 6/16/12 3:02 PM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
  OK, several folks came back and recommended detuning my transmit
 antenna in receive.
 
  Certainly any receive antenna I have is going to be in the shadow of my
 transmit antenna, a 130-foot flat-top about 85 feet up, fed against ground.
 (Really it's an 80 meter doublet fed with ladder line. I tie the ladder
 line together at the bottom and feed against ground.)
 
  Trying to figure out what detune is.
 
  I match the transmit antenna to 50 ohm coax with a L network at the
 bottom. If I want to detune, then I can open up the connection between
 the antenna and the L network at the bottom? Unhook the L or C in the L
 network? Short out the antenna where it comes into the L network? I could
 rig up a relay contact to do any of those.
 
  Tim N3QE
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Summer Stew Results...

2012-06-17 Thread Sam Morgan
I ended up with 12 contacts for the whole night not to shabby for
6w ERP from a 7' tall Hi-Q Screwdriver @ 20' w/16 radials ea 13' long.

Out of the 12 contacts, 2 were ~400km,  2 were ~600km, 4 were ~1100km, 1 was
~1700km, and 3 were over 2000km.

I basically worked every one I could hear, with the exception of
a few (4-5) that I heard answering other folks cq's,
but never heard them anywhere calling cq themselves.

--
GB  73
K5OAI
Sam Morgan


On 6/17/2012 8:15 PM, Jim F. wrote:
 I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max.

 Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who copied 
 W1FMR/QRP.
 I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com and his 1/4 
 wave
 vertical.

 Stations that copied my 5w. signal:


 K2TTT234.4 mi
 W6XR277.7 mi
 K1GQ38.7 mi
 NO3M452.5 mi
 VE3TA465.5 mi
 K1ZO  71.0 mi
 K2CBI192.0 mi
 VE9HF292.7 mi
 W2XL 180.2 mi
 AB1OD  118.5 mi
 W3GH477.1 mi
 N4IS 1287.8 mi
 N4PN986.7 mi
 VE3OSZ284.2 mi
 K1LT  650.0 mi
 N3QE427.0 mi
 K7CS438.5 mi

TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials
 and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP.

 73,
 Jim / W1FMR - NH

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Summer Stew Results...

2012-06-17 Thread Sam Morgan
translated into miles :-)
KB5NJD   245mi
WD5R 640mi
N7DF 244mi
K7CA 800mi
N03M1308mi
N0TT 650mi
W5XZ 359mi
KG7H1448mi
N3RN1090mi
K9YC1321mi
NM5S 361mi
KI0I 593mi


GB  73
K5OAI
Sam Morgan


On 6/17/2012 9:17 PM, Sam Morgan wrote:
 I ended up with 12 contacts for the whole night not to shabby for
 6w ERP from a 7' tall Hi-Q Screwdriver @ 20' w/16 radials ea 13' long.

 Out of the 12 contacts, 2 were ~400km,  2 were ~600km, 4 were ~1100km, 1 was
 ~1700km, and 3 were over 2000km.

 I basically worked every one I could hear, with the exception of
 a few (4-5) that I heard answering other folks cq's,
 but never heard them anywhere calling cq themselves.

 --
 GB  73
 K5OAI
 Sam Morgan


 On 6/17/2012 8:15 PM, Jim F. wrote:
 I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max.

 Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who copied 
 W1FMR/QRP.
 I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com and his 1/4 
 wave
 vertical.

 Stations that copied my 5w. signal:


 K2TTT234.4 mi
 W6XR277.7 mi
 K1GQ38.7 mi
 NO3M452.5 mi
 VE3TA465.5 mi
 K1ZO  71.0 mi
 K2CBI192.0 mi
 VE9HF292.7 mi
 W2XL 180.2 mi
 AB1OD  118.5 mi
 W3GH477.1 mi
 N4IS 1287.8 mi
 N4PN986.7 mi
 VE3OSZ284.2 mi
 K1LT  650.0 mi
 N3QE427.0 mi
 K7CS438.5 mi

TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials
 and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP.

 73,
 Jim / W1FMR - NH



___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive

2012-06-17 Thread Missouri Guy
A previous edition (and maybe the current one) of 
the Low Band DXing book has several methods of 
detuning TX antennas...might be worth a look.  Some
can be done right in the shack.

73
Charlie, N0TT

On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:37:55 -0700 Bob K6UJ k...@pacbell.net writes:
 I am very interested in this subject, I am trying to figure out how 
 to detune my 160 inverted L.I am using a flag antenna for 
 receive and unfortunately
 it is only about 50 feet from the base of the L.By itself the 
 flag works very  well at reducing the local electrical noise, (which 
 luckily it is coming from only one direction)
 When the L is strung up it the flag is useless,  it reradiates the 
 noise like mad.   I'm hoping to learn more solutions on detuning 
 xmit antennas during receive from the group.  
 Wouldn't it be nice if all we had to do was ground the feedline to 
 the xmit antenna during receive ?   sigh   I 
 guess the idea is to make the xmit antenna non resonant anywhere 
 near 
 the operating freq during receive.   
 
 Bob
 K6UJ 
 
 On Jun 17, 2012, at 8:03 AM, W2XJ wrote:
 
  There is no single solution for detuning an antenna it depends on 
 
  electrical length. For verticals a quarter wavelength or less it 
 is 
  common to have a contactor between the network and the radiating 
 element 
  and open the connection to float that element. This is the 
 practice in 
  commercial directional arrays where some tower are not used in a 
 day or 
  night mode.  This does not work well on taller towers and I do not 
 know 
  offhand how it would work with the T. It is easy enough to model 
 in EZNEC.
  
  On 6/16/12 3:02 PM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
  OK, several folks came back and recommended detuning my transmit 
 antenna in receive.
  
  Certainly any receive antenna I have is going to be in the shadow 
 of my transmit antenna, a 130-foot flat-top about 85 feet up, fed 
 against ground. (Really it's an 80 meter doublet fed with ladder 
 line. I tie the ladder line together at the bottom and feed against 
 ground.)
  
  Trying to figure out what detune is.
  
  I match the transmit antenna to 50 ohm coax with a L network at 
 the bottom. If I want to detune, then I can open up the 
 connection between the antenna and the L network at the bottom? 
 Unhook the L or C in the L network? Short out the antenna where it 
 comes into the L network? I could rig up a relay contact to do any 
 of those.
  
  Tim N3QE
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
  
  ___
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 
 
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Summer Stew Results

2012-06-17 Thread James Rogers

Top banders,

I worked 39 stations in 2 1/2 hours last night. I finished the  
installation of a K2AV FCP about 6pm, ate supper, and was QRV at  
z. Conditions here are 70 ft up Inv-L then across 60 ft  in two  
pecan trees and running from 300 to 550w depending on TX frequency,  
with FCP lowest wire up 8'.

I need to lengthen the Inv-L since my resonant freq is currently 1870.

Long distance winner for me was VE9HF who answered my cq.

Thanks for the qso's.

Jim N4DU



  
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Summer Stew Results...

2012-06-17 Thread w7dra
gosh, thanks, was going to ask, but thought i would look dumb..

mike w7dra 


On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:25:40 -0500 Sam Morgan k5oai@gmail.com
writes:
 translated into miles :-)
 KB5NJD   245mi
 WD5R 640mi
 N7DF 244mi
 K7CA 800mi
 N03M1308mi
 N0TT 650mi
 W5XZ 359mi
 KG7H1448mi
 N3RN1090mi
 K9YC1321mi
 NM5S 361mi
 KI0I 593mi
 
 
 GB  73
 K5OAI
 Sam Morgan
 
 
 On 6/17/2012 9:17 PM, Sam Morgan wrote:
  I ended up with 12 contacts for the whole night not to shabby for
  6w ERP from a 7' tall Hi-Q Screwdriver @ 20' w/16 radials ea 13' 
 long.
 
  Out of the 12 contacts, 2 were ~400km,  2 were ~600km, 4 were 
 ~1100km, 1 was
  ~1700km, and 3 were over 2000km.
 
  I basically worked every one I could hear, with the exception of
  a few (4-5) that I heard answering other folks cq's,
  but never heard them anywhere calling cq themselves.
 
  --
  GB  73
  K5OAI
  Sam Morgan
 
 
  On 6/17/2012 8:15 PM, Jim F. wrote:
  I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max.
 
  Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who 
 copied W1FMR/QRP.
  I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com 
 and his 1/4 wave
  vertical.
 
  Stations that copied my 5w. signal:
 
 
  K2TTT234.4 mi
  W6XR277.7 mi
  K1GQ38.7 mi
  NO3M452.5 mi
  VE3TA465.5 mi
  K1ZO  71.0 mi
  K2CBI192.0 mi
  VE9HF292.7 mi
  W2XL 180.2 mi
  AB1OD  118.5 mi
  W3GH477.1 mi
  N4IS 1287.8 mi
  N4PN986.7 mi
  VE3OSZ284.2 mi
  K1LT  650.0 mi
  N3QE427.0 mi
  K7CS438.5 mi
 
 TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials
  and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP.
 
  73,
  Jim / W1FMR - NH
 
 
 
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 
 


Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK