Re: Topband: Spiderbeam Topband Mast suggestions

2013-08-24 Thread Philip Smith
Hi, Regarding recent topic, Spiderbeam mast suggestions needed.

Please note, 
The September 2013 issue of Radio Society of Great Britain (RSGB) RADCOM 
contains an article by Steve Nichols G0KYA
on the Spiderbeam Model 160-18-4 WTH 160M Vertical.
Info on setting up, quality, and some idea on performance.

73
Phil G4LWB



Message Received: Aug 24 2013, 05:01 PM
From: topband-requ...@contesting.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Cc: 
Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 128, Issue 25

Send Topband mailing list submissions to
topband@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
topband-requ...@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
topband-ow...@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Topband digest...


Today's Topics:

1. Spiderbeam mast suggestions needed (Jim Garland)
2. Vertical Antennas (Eddy Swynar)
3. Re: Spiderbeam mast suggestions needed (GeorgeWallner)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:46:43 -0600
From: Jim Garland 4cx2...@miamioh.edu
To: 
Subject: Topband: Spiderbeam mast suggestions needed
Message-ID: 002101cea020$5a04ba60$0e0e2f20$@miamioh.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi everyone,

I'm _finally_ trying to erect a decent vertical for 80m and 160m, and have
purchased a 26m (85ft) Spiderbeam mast. I'd really like to hear from guys
who have used this mast for these bands. I'll have about 60 120ft radials.
I've seen sheet from the manufacturer about using the mast as a monoband
160m shortened vertical. The diagram shows a wire wound aound the mast, with
4 7m wires near the top for a capacity hat, but wonder what other
configurations people have used? Also, if possible I'd like to be able to
use the mast on both 80m and 160m. It will located about 600 ft from my
house.

73,

Jim W8ZR



--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:00:11 -0400
From: Eddy Swynar 
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Vertical Antennas
Message-ID: 278fd2d7-c0de-4f58-a303-88b8bb9d7...@xplornet.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Guys,

While I most certainly agree with what others such as Tom (W8JI) might offer 
here as to the value of TRUE A vs. B comparisons when it comes to how 
effective an 
antenna may be, I won't let a little thing like expediency deter me from 
erecting---and using---a ...less than stellar antenna...

Case in point: at our summer cottage (a two storey affair, with an upper 
balcony), I lashed together some aluminum tubing to tie to the railing on the 
second floor with 
bungy cord: I made up the balance of its length for a 1/4-wave 7-MHz vertical 
with a re-cycled old electrical extension cord dropped down from the aluminum, 
which 
terminates at the feed point some 3' above physical ground. I then unrolled 2 
insulated counterpoise wires, 1/4-wavelength long, in opposite directions.

Surprisingly the doggone thing works very well into Europe, no doubt testament 
as to the effectiveness of the stations of our European friends(!) as much as 
anything 
else at this end of my QSOs...but the point is, it works quite well with just 
the 100-watts that I might pump into it from my now-ancient Yaesu FT-980 
transceiver.

So don't despair, and---as the Nike slogan so aptly puts it---JUST DO IT!!!

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:19:59 -0400
From: GeorgeWallner 
To: Jim Garland 4cx2...@miamioh.edu, 
Subject: Re: Topband: Spiderbeam mast suggestions needed
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Jim,

My home QTH and all my DXpeditions had SpiderPole 
verticals for 80 and 160 (and other bands). You have a 
wide range of options. A lot depends on how much work you 
are willing to do and how much efficiency you want to 
squeeze out of the system.

The simplest arrangement would be a low loss loading coil 
(around 60 uH) somewhere in the middle to resonate the 
antenna on 1.9 MHz. Use AWG #14 insulated wire for the 
whole length and fold it back at the tip to create a 30 cm 
(1 foot) diameter loop to reduce voltages on the tip and 
to add a little bit of top loading. Add an approximately 8 
uH inductor between the base and GND. You will find a 50 
ohm tap point on the inductor somewhere around the center. 
For the base inductor use 1/4 inch copper pipe or large 
diameter wire. For 80 m use a relay to switch in a 
suitable L matching network.

An alternative is to use an inverted L configuration. Use 
very thin wire for the horizontal section to reduce the 
side load as the tope part of the SpiderPole is very 
flexible. You may find that you can get decent SWR with 
the 50 ohm coax connected directly to the feed-point. 

Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

2013-08-24 Thread Jim GM
So the general concessions is that 7:5 turns was better.  Do is 15:7 turns
or 21:10 turns better? Whats best for 160M ?

-- 
Jim K9TF
_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

2013-08-24 Thread Mike Waters
All those turns are better for what? For the winding that's connected to
the coax (either 50 or 75 ohms), two turns is plenty.

And good luck stuffing all that wire inside the holes in those binocular
cores, especially if you use the recommended protective insulating liner.
:-)

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jim GM jim.gmfo...@gmail.com wrote:

 So the general concessions is that 7:5 turns was better.  Do is 15:7 turns
 or 21:10 turns better? Whats best for 160M ?

_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

2013-08-24 Thread Charlie Cunningham
As I recall, when I wound the tranformer for my 40' X 10' KAZ terminated
loop, I wound it 3:13 T because I was trying to match from 50 ohms up to
around 950 ohms. The core I used was binocular that I cobbled together by
taping together two Fair-Rite tubular cores, side-by-side. I used wire-wrap
wire. Worked really well, and surely  helped me on 160 and 80m, but it was a
great receive antenna for 40 and 30m as well.

73,
Charlie, K4OTV

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Waters
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 6:00 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

All those turns are better for what? For the winding that's connected to
the coax (either 50 or 75 ohms), two turns is plenty.

And good luck stuffing all that wire inside the holes in those binocular
cores, especially if you use the recommended protective insulating liner.
:-)

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jim GM jim.gmfo...@gmail.com wrote:

 So the general concessions is that 7:5 turns was better.  Do is 15:7 turns
 or 21:10 turns better? Whats best for 160M ?

_
Topband Reflector

_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

2013-08-24 Thread Mike Waters
I'm not sure what kind of material you made that from, but 3 or even 4
turns is OK for the low-Z winding on the #73 solid 2-hole cores we were
talking about earlier. It seemed to work well for you. :-)

Sometimes, we have to cascade two transformers to get to the Z ratio we
want.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Charlie Cunningham 
charlie-cunning...@nc.rr.com wrote:

 As I recall, when I wound the tranformer for my 40' X 10' KAZ terminated
 loop, I wound it 3:13 T because I was trying to match from 50 ohms up to
 around 950 ohms. The core I used was binocular that I cobbled together by
 taping together two Fair-Rite tubular cores, side-by-side. I used wire-wrap
 wire. Worked really well, and surely  helped me on 160 and 80m, but it was
 a
 great receive antenna for 40 and 30m as well.

_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

2013-08-24 Thread Charlie Cunningham
Pretty sure it's 73 material, Mike. That's about all I had in my Fair-Rite
engineering and  designer kits.

73,
Charlie, K4OTV


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Waters
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 8:12 PM
To: Charlie Cunningham
Cc: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!!

I'm not sure what kind of material you made that from, but 3 or even 4
turns is OK for the low-Z winding on the #73 solid 2-hole cores we were
talking about earlier. It seemed to work well for you. :-)

Sometimes, we have to cascade two transformers to get to the Z ratio we
want.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Charlie Cunningham 
charlie-cunning...@nc.rr.com wrote:

 As I recall, when I wound the tranformer for my 40' X 10' KAZ terminated
 loop, I wound it 3:13 T because I was trying to match from 50 ohms up to
 around 950 ohms. The core I used was binocular that I cobbled together by
 taping together two Fair-Rite tubular cores, side-by-side. I used
wire-wrap
 wire. Worked really well, and surely  helped me on 160 and 80m, but it was
 a
 great receive antenna for 40 and 30m as well.

_
Topband Reflector

_
Topband Reflector