Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Nuradi
Thankyou verymuch to Grant KZ1W, Greg ZL3IX, Mike W0BTU, Garry NI6T and Jim
K9YC for all the suggestion.

As suggest by Grant KZ1W and Jim K9YC, I will install a half-lambda dipole
on 160M with both ends were 90 degrees bent due to the size of the building
,and find out what will be the Tx / Rx performance...

To Mike W0BTU, it is slightly difficult to install the radial for the
vertical antenna or inverted L as
the roof top is not empty flat, hi hi

Regards,
Nuradi, YB0UNC / KU2B
 

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 11:23 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

And remember -- the roof of this building is 110m, so a horizontal 
antenna is high enough to have pretty good low angle radiation!  See

http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf  and double the heights for 
the graphs of 80M performance.  When you're thinking height, consider 
the building a tower -- it's mostly the far field reflection that 
determines the vertical pattern.

As to ground for a vertical antenna -- let's not confuse the word 
ground with counterpoise or radial system. An end-fed current-fed 
vertical needs a counterpoise or radials, NOT a connection to earth.

I strongly concur with the advice to spend some serious time LISTENING 
on that roof before doing anything else.  It's pretty common for the 
stuff described on that roof to be MONDO NOISY, and it's unlikely that 
you can do much about most of it unless the guys who maintain it are HF 
hams.

73, Jim K9YC

On Fri,8/7/2015 8:02 PM, Garry Shapiro wrote:
 And Bob Brown used a monograph by J.A. Ratcliffe--The Magneto-Ionic 
 Theory and its Application to the Ionosphere which says the same 
 thing. It has to do with the angle between the E vector and the 
 Earth's Geomagnetic Field, which is horizontal at the geomagnetic 
 equator. Bob borrowed my copy of the book when he was writing the Big 
 Gun's Guide.

 Garry, NI6T

 On 8/7/2015 6:24 PM, Greg - ZL3IX wrote:
 Careful Mike! Jakarta is close to the equator, and power coupling is 
 likely to be better from a horizontally polarised antenna, especially 
 in an E-W direction.  Ref The Big Gun's Guide to Low-Band Propagation 
 by Bob Brown, NM7M (SK) 

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: Top Band Antenna

2015-08-08 Thread rodger bryce



Thanks to all who responded to my enquiry...an Inverted 'L' was the most 
common advice so will give that option some serious thought. Further question:  
should a ground rod be used as part of a radial system, or should it be treated 
separately.? I have seen various arguments for and against, wondering what the 
group thinks on this. Thanks, Rodger/GM3JOB
  
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Top Band Antenna

2015-08-08 Thread Jon Zaimes
My most recent method of connecting radials at the base of a vertical is to
drive in a short copper pipe ground rod and use an all-stainless hose clamp
to attach the wires to it.

But in some portable operations I have dispensed with any ground rod, and
the antenna still seems to work fine.

73/Jon AA1K


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of rodger
bryce
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 7:06 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Top Band Antenna




Thanks to all who responded to my enquiry...an Inverted 'L' was the most
common advice so will give that option some serious thought. Further
question:  should a ground rod be used as part of a radial system, or should
it be treated separately.? I have seen various arguments for and against,
wondering what the group thinks on this. Thanks, Rodger/GM3JOB
  
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Art Snapper
If the noise level is too high, perhaps you could use a separate receive
antenna.

A pennant, flag, or coaxial loop, might help null noise from certain
directions.

Art NK8X
ᐧ

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Nuradi yb0...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thankyou verymuch to Grant KZ1W, Greg ZL3IX, Mike W0BTU, Garry NI6T and Jim
 K9YC for all the suggestion.

 As suggest by Grant KZ1W and Jim K9YC, I will install a half-lambda dipole
 on 160M with both ends were 90 degrees bent due to the size of the building
 ,and find out what will be the Tx / Rx performance...

 To Mike W0BTU, it is slightly difficult to install the radial for the
 vertical antenna or inverted L as
 the roof top is not empty flat, hi hi

 Regards,
 Nuradi, YB0UNC / KU2B


 -Original Message-
 From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
 Brown
 Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 11:23 AM
 To: topband@contesting.com
 Subject: Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

 And remember -- the roof of this building is 110m, so a horizontal
 antenna is high enough to have pretty good low angle radiation!  See

 http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf  and double the heights for
 the graphs of 80M performance.  When you're thinking height, consider
 the building a tower -- it's mostly the far field reflection that
 determines the vertical pattern.

 As to ground for a vertical antenna -- let's not confuse the word
 ground with counterpoise or radial system. An end-fed current-fed
 vertical needs a counterpoise or radials, NOT a connection to earth.

 I strongly concur with the advice to spend some serious time LISTENING
 on that roof before doing anything else.  It's pretty common for the
 stuff described on that roof to be MONDO NOISY, and it's unlikely that
 you can do much about most of it unless the guys who maintain it are HF
 hams.

 73, Jim K9YC

 On Fri,8/7/2015 8:02 PM, Garry Shapiro wrote:
  And Bob Brown used a monograph by J.A. Ratcliffe--The Magneto-Ionic
  Theory and its Application to the Ionosphere which says the same
  thing. It has to do with the angle between the E vector and the
  Earth's Geomagnetic Field, which is horizontal at the geomagnetic
  equator. Bob borrowed my copy of the book when he was writing the Big
  Gun's Guide.
 
  Garry, NI6T
 
  On 8/7/2015 6:24 PM, Greg - ZL3IX wrote:
  Careful Mike! Jakarta is close to the equator, and power coupling is
  likely to be better from a horizontally polarised antenna, especially
  in an E-W direction.  Ref The Big Gun's Guide to Low-Band Propagation
  by Bob Brown, NM7M (SK)

 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Top Band Antenna

2015-08-08 Thread Jim Brown

On Sat,8/8/2015 4:05 AM, rodger bryce wrote:

  Further question:  should a ground rod be used as part of a radial system, or 
should it be treated separately.? I have seen various arguments for and 
against, wondering what the group thinks on this.


A ground rod is NOT an effective part of a radial system, but it IS 
important for lightning protection.


Here are slides for a talk I've done at Pacificon and for several ham 
clubs. http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf


73, Jim K9YC
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Tom W8JI
And remember -- the roof of this building is 110m, so a horizontal antenna 
is high enough to have pretty good low angle radiation!  See




Large buildings are not towers or poles. Buildings have a significant amount 
of large conductive metallic things and noise generating junk inside.


A simple vertical antenna has elevation pattern mostly determined by ground 
several wavelengths from the antenna.


A simple horizontal antenna generally has elevation pattern mostly 
determined by ground immediately below the antenna up to a few wavelengths 
out.


If the building has wiring and large connected metallic things under the 
horizontal antenna, it will act like a reflector. If the antenna is somewhat 
low to the roof (less than 1/4 wave or more above the roof), the elevation 
pattern won't be much different than a low dipole over flat earth. Most of 
the radiation will be beamed straight up.


A vertical also will have a null below the antenna, nulling building 
coupling for RF.   A horizontal has maximum possible signal into and out of 
the building. Even with a 400 ft high building, a horizontal antenna a 
fraction of wave over the roof can be very disappointing.


73 Tom 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread K1FZ-Bruce

 
Some years ago, on 80 meters, an LZ station had a horizontal between 
two tall buildings and had a very strong signal. 
 

73
Bruce-k1fz
www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html
 
 

On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:58:22 -0400, Tom W8JI  wrote:

   And remember -- the roof of this building is 110m, so a 
horizontal antenna

is high enough to have pretty good low angle radiation! See



Large buildings are not towers or poles. Buildings have a significant amount
of large conductive metallic things and noise generating junk inside. 


A vertical also will have a null below the antenna, nulling building
coupling for RF. A horizontal has maximum possible signal into and out of
the building. Even with a 400 ft high building, a horizontal antenna a
fraction of wave over the roof can be very disappointing. 


73 Tom

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Merv Schweigert
I have been in Jakarta and also a number of places in China trying to 
operate
from a city environment,  you cannot believe the noise, S9 if your 
lucky,  and its

360 degs, impossible to null,
Operating from BY1QH building top, the best was a dipole stretched 
between two buildings roofs.
At times the noise would go below S9,  was there two weeks trying to 
pull 160

signals out.
If you have never been there and heard that, its hard to grasp. Putting 
out a

signal was never a problem, hearing any one was.

We complain about plasma TV noise and other noise from Chinese made 
appliances
just think of trying to operate in the center of 5 or 10 million of 
these devices all around
you, and an the same care taken for the infrastructure of electric lines 
etc,  coated

with coal and smog dust and pollution, arcing at every juncture.
I bet the space station can hear the buzz on their electronics as they 
pass over

these areas.

73 Merv K9FD/KH6


If the noise level is too high, perhaps you could use a separate receive
antenna.

A pennant, flag, or coaxial loop, might help null noise from certain
directions.

Art NK8X
ᐧ

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Nuradi yb0...@gmail.com wrote:


Thankyou verymuch to Grant KZ1W, Greg ZL3IX, Mike W0BTU, Garry NI6T and Jim
K9YC for all the suggestion.

As suggest by Grant KZ1W and Jim K9YC, I will install a half-lambda dipole
on 160M with both ends were 90 degrees bent due to the size of the building
,and find out what will be the Tx / Rx performance...

To Mike W0BTU, it is slightly difficult to install the radial for the
vertical antenna or inverted L as
the roof top is not empty flat, hi hi

Regards,
Nuradi, YB0UNC / KU2B


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 11:23 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

And remember -- the roof of this building is 110m, so a horizontal
antenna is high enough to have pretty good low angle radiation!  See

http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf  and double the heights for
the graphs of 80M performance.  When you're thinking height, consider
the building a tower -- it's mostly the far field reflection that
determines the vertical pattern.

As to ground for a vertical antenna -- let's not confuse the word
ground with counterpoise or radial system. An end-fed current-fed
vertical needs a counterpoise or radials, NOT a connection to earth.

I strongly concur with the advice to spend some serious time LISTENING
on that roof before doing anything else.  It's pretty common for the
stuff described on that roof to be MONDO NOISY, and it's unlikely that
you can do much about most of it unless the guys who maintain it are HF
hams.

73, Jim K9YC

On Fri,8/7/2015 8:02 PM, Garry Shapiro wrote:

And Bob Brown used a monograph by J.A. Ratcliffe--The Magneto-Ionic
Theory and its Application to the Ionosphere which says the same
thing. It has to do with the angle between the E vector and the
Earth's Geomagnetic Field, which is horizontal at the geomagnetic
equator. Bob borrowed my copy of the book when he was writing the Big
Gun's Guide.

Garry, NI6T

On 8/7/2015 6:24 PM, Greg - ZL3IX wrote:

Careful Mike! Jakarta is close to the equator, and power coupling is
likely to be better from a horizontally polarised antenna, especially
in an E-W direction.  Ref The Big Gun's Guide to Low-Band Propagation
by Bob Brown, NM7M (SK)

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread W2RU - Bud Hippisley

 On Aug 8, 2015, at 10:58 22AM, Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com wrote:
 
 Large buildings are not towers or poles. Buildings have a significant amount 
 of large conductive metallic things and noise generating junk inside.
 
 If the building has wiring and large connected metallic things under the 
 horizontal antenna, it will act like a reflector. If the antenna is somewhat 
 low to the roof (less than 1/4 wave or more above the roof), the elevation 
 pattern won't be much different than a low dipole over flat earth. Most of 
 the radiation will be beamed straight up.
 
 Even with a 400 ft high building, a horizontal antenna a fraction of wave 
 over the roof can be very disappointing.

Many years ago, at the start of my sophomore year in college, a classmate and I 
decided to operate CW Sweepstakes from my room in a 5-story dormitory.  The 
dormitory footprint was a long, skinny rectangle with brick parapets rising 10 
feet above the rooftop at the four corners of the building.  We had easy access 
to the roof, which was flat with a tar and gravel surface, so we strung an 
80-meter center-fed dipole diagonally across the roof between two opposing 
parapets — but, with the usual wire sag, the feedpoint was about 5 feet above 
the gravel.  We weren’t worried, because the roof was at least 70 feet above 
the surrounding terrain.

We had a single-813 transmitter that ran 500 watts input at a time when the 
legal limit was 1 KW input.  It was far more power than I was accustomed to, 
since my home station transmitter at that time was a Heath DX-40, running about 
a tenth as much power.  I was expecting “great things” in this contest, but it 
was one of the most disappointing outings I’ve ever participated in — we 
struggled for every QSO the entire weekend!

A few days after the contest we learned from the head of the college 
maintenance department that underneath all that tar and gravel was a solid 
sheet of copper! 

Moral of the story:  Believe what Tom tells you — especially his final sentence 
above!

Bud, W2RU  
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Tom W8JI


Some years ago, on 80 meters, an LZ station had a horizontal between two 
tall buildings and had a very strong signal.

73
Bruce-k1fz


Between buildings is entirely different than on a building roof.

Full context is important. As I said:

A simple vertical antenna has elevation pattern mostly determined by ground
several wavelengths from the antenna.

A simple horizontal antenna generally has elevation pattern mostly
determined by ground  * immediately below   the antenna up 
to a few wavelengths

out.

If the building has wiring and large connected metallic things under 
the
horizontal antenna*, it will act like a reflector. If the antenna is 
somewhat

low to the roof (less than 1/4 wave or more above the roof), the elevation
pattern won't be much different than a low dipole over flat earth. Most of
the radiation will be beamed straight up.


73 Tom



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: [Bulk] Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread JC


Even with a 400 ft high building, a horizontal antenna a fraction of wave
over the roof can be very disappointing.

Tom is 100% right, one of the best rood top signal on top band is from
9M2AX. Ross tested several antennas and the only one that worked well was
the inverted L. He has a tall fiberglass mast on top a water mast to keep
the vertical part of the L high above the roof top. Ross also used a sloper
for some time.

Ross can provide more details of his excellent top band antenna.

Best combination is a horizontal loaded  loop like a flag for RX or a Waller
Flag and the vertical inverted L for TX.

Regards
JC

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Mirko S57AD
Nuradi, how about halfwave sloping dipoles hung digonally from the top of
the building?  Some 30 years ago at YU1EXY we had contest shack at top of
60m tall building with student's dormitory.  In spite the building was in
the middle of city noise, sloping dipoles played extremely well. Later we
replaced sloping dipoles with sloped yagis for 80m (3 el toward NW (USA)
and 2 el toward NE (Japan).   With halfwave sloping dipole we managed to
QSO KH6 on 160m, very though contact from this part of Europe.  Maybe
building acted as kind of reflector on this band...

73,  Mirko, S57AD

2015-08-08 1:52 GMT+02:00 Nuradi yb0...@gmail.com:

 Dear all,

 In preparation of this coming WW big contest, I plan to install wire
 antenna
 on a roof top of a 33rd storey building (about 110metres above the ground)
 for operating on the 160M, 80M and  40M band.



 The building roof top rectangular size about  45 metres long (from
 NWtoN-326.8 degress to SEtoS-146.8degrees) and 33 metres wide
 (fromNEtoE-56.8 degrees to SWtoW-236.8 degrees) located in centre of
 Jakarta
 city.



 The roof top have plenty of cellulair microwave operator antennas
 (operating
 in 5GHz and above ALSO one TV operator with around 400MHz working freq.)
 and
 there are also two SelfSupportingTower-15metres high, on each end of the
 long side of the building.

 There is also one-SST belong to theTV operator which is about 50 metres
 high, located on the SE end of the roof top.

 Good grounding terminal is available as it's used for grounding all the
 communication antennas/equipments.

 I have my own room in the centre of the roof top where we put all our
 indoor
 microwave devices and routers/switch.



 Prefereable wire antenna is lazy 'laying'H or quad, dipole, slope..

 I appreciate verymuch any suggestion, input from all, regarding the best
 wire antenna for this site to be used in the 160M, 80M and 40M band.





 Thankyou very much indeed in advance.



 Regards,

 Nuradi, YB0UNC / KU2B

 Cellulair +62811138378



 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Top Band Antenna

2015-08-08 Thread john
I have this with interest---lot of stuff   maybe even at age  74 you 
can teach an old dog new tricks...bookmarked and will attempt to 
absorbthanks   73 john w8wej


On 8/8/2015 2:55 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

On Sat,8/8/2015 4:05 AM, rodger bryce wrote:
  Further question:  should a ground rod be used as part of a radial 
system, or should it be treated separately.? I have seen various 
arguments for and against, wondering what the group thinks on this.


A ground rod is NOT an effective part of a radial system, but it IS 
important for lightning protection.


Here are slides for a talk I've done at Pacificon and for several ham 
clubs. http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf


73, Jim K9YC
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Best wire antenna for roof top location

2015-08-08 Thread Douglas Ruz
I agree with Mirko...sloping dipoles is the best choice for Nuradi 
location...THE LOW BAND DXING book

is very clear.

If SEA WATER is close it is better.

73Douglas, CO8DM

No creo que haya alguna emoción más intensa para un inventor que ver alguna
de sus creaciones funcionando. Esa emoción hace que uno se olvide de comer,
de dormir, de todo. - Nikola Tesla
- Original Message - 
From: Mirko S57AD miroslav.sibi...@amis.net

To: Nuradi yb0...@gmail.com
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Best wire antenna for roof top location



Nuradi, how about halfwave sloping dipoles hung digonally from the top of
the building?  Some 30 years ago at YU1EXY we had contest shack at top of
60m tall building with student's dormitory.  In spite the building was in
the middle of city noise, sloping dipoles played extremely well. Later we
replaced sloping dipoles with sloped yagis for 80m (3 el toward NW (USA)
and 2 el toward NE (Japan).   With halfwave sloping dipole we managed to
QSO KH6 on 160m, very though contact from this part of Europe.  Maybe
building acted as kind of reflector on this band...

73,  Mirko, S57AD

2015-08-08 1:52 GMT+02:00 Nuradi yb0...@gmail.com:


Dear all,

In preparation of this coming WW big contest, I plan to install wire
antenna
on a roof top of a 33rd storey building (about 110metres above the
ground)
for operating on the 160M, 80M and  40M band.



The building roof top rectangular size about  45 metres long (from
NWtoN-326.8 degress to SEtoS-146.8degrees) and 33 metres wide
(fromNEtoE-56.8 degrees to SWtoW-236.8 degrees) located in centre of
Jakarta
city.



The roof top have plenty of cellulair microwave operator antennas
(operating
in 5GHz and above ALSO one TV operator with around 400MHz working freq.)
and
there are also two SelfSupportingTower-15metres high, on each end of the
long side of the building.

There is also one-SST belong to theTV operator which is about 50 metres
high, located on the SE end of the roof top.

Good grounding terminal is available as it's used for grounding all the
communication antennas/equipments.

I have my own room in the centre of the roof top where we put all our
indoor
microwave devices and routers/switch.



Prefereable wire antenna is lazy 'laying'H or quad, dipole, slope..

I appreciate verymuch any suggestion, input from all, regarding the best
wire antenna for this site to be used in the 160M, 80M and 40M band.





Thankyou very much indeed in advance.



Regards,

Nuradi, YB0UNC / KU2B

Cellulair +62811138378



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband