Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

2016-06-06 Thread James Rodenkirch
Bob - I couldn't agree morelisten, call CQ every so often (use RBN to see 
how you're "doing"), repeat.take notes, etc.

However, I'll add a slightly slant/entreaty hereI've been on 160 
and 80 in the early morning hours (1000Z to 1300Z) for days (3 to 5) at a time 
(most recently, about three weeks ago) listening, calling CQ, listening, 
watching the ON4KST reflector to see who's on and trying to make 
Qs...nary one other station heard.

Now, one "note" - I am at QRP to just over QRP (10 watts) and I don't employ a 
BOG or Beveridge or other rx-only antenna BUTI do enjoy a relatively quiet 
home location in s/w Utah where S levels are around S3 or so..still no 
calls, no hearing CQs, nada. In short,  I become "bummed" somewhat when I see 
RBN reports from stations in WA, CA, MN, AZ and NV of 20, 14, 16 etc., as I 
call CQ, knowing FULL well there have to be others "on the band."

I wish others wud listen on top band and 80 --- if they hear some "less than 
exotic call sign calling CQ," give the guy/gal a call, send an RST and move on! 

I feel like - NO, I believe firmly - there is a "snooty view" by those ops with 
THE ultimate antenna farms (tx and rcv) that takes over when they get on 160 or 
80 - they light the filaments of their amps, ensure they are selecting 
the"correct" rx array "heading," and listen "vehemently" for any signs of a VK, 
a JA, a "whatever" call sign...as long as it isn't aW/K...! wish others on 
160/80 wud invest one minute to answer a CQ, send the RST and move on. it's 
OK to work a fella W/K ham on top band - it won't sully you image amongst the 
"top band elite." 

I KNOW I do "well" in the CQ, ARRL and Stew events - so, albeit a QRP to 10 
watt limitation, I know it's not my "system"!

I hope some of youz will start listening a little and take opportunities to 
answer CQs on top band, during non-contesting times..understanding there 
are us "peanut whistle" stations out there who, simply, enjoy hearing a reply 
to our CQs OR hope to hear others calling CQ, sans "CQ DX"!

71.5/72 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV

Monday, June 06, 2016 2:58 AM
To: jkaufm...@alum.mit.edu ; 'Carl Luetzelschwab' ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

...SNIP...

I believe we still have so much to learn on this subject.
That is why nothing beats listening no matter what the numbers say.
73 and gud DX.  Bob K3UL

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

2016-06-06 Thread Paul Mclaren
I don't think anybody lives near VK4CT that operates on HF.   I often get
received on his RBN but can never raise a reply from the locals so it is
not particular to 160m.

Regards

Paul MM0ZBH

On 6 June 2016 at 16:20, Milt  wrote:

>
> -Original Message- From: Bob Garrett
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:58 AM
> To: jkaufm...@alum.mit.edu ; 'Carl Luetzelschwab' ; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min
>
> ...SNIP...
>
> I believe we still have so much to learn on this subject.
> That is why nothing beats listening no matter what the numbers say.
> 73 and gud DX.  Bob K3UL
>
> =
>
> I am certainly guilty of neglecting 'The Band' during the northern
> hemisphere summers.  Near constant QRN and short nights (for sleeping) are
> the two main reasons I have traditionally not operated TB between the
> equinoxes.
>
> This year I have made a concerted effort to do spot checks on the band,
> particularly the early morning hours when QRN is the lowest.  However, this
> time frame allows a possibility of contacts only to the Pacific region.
>
> I truly believe that Bob's statement above re listening is the true clue
> to fully utilizing the fickle offerings of 160 Meters.
>
> As an example, this past week, the local morning of June 2, I CQed to the
> west, alternately at 225, 270 & 315 degrees.  I began at 1100 Z and
> continued until my sunrise at ~1200 Z.
>
> I did not receive any responses to my CQ's; no contacts were logged.
>
> QRN level was quite low, so I can only presume there were few if any
> stations in the targeted areas of South Pacific Islands, ZL, VK, JA, UA0
> and SE Asia on the air during this time period.
>
> I believe 'The Band' was WIDE OPEN to at least a portion of VK, if not
> other areas.  Apparently no stations were listening at that time.
>
> The RBN system provides a good insight into the propagation available.
> Besides western US RBN station reports, I noted the following.
>
>  de   DX Freq SNR   Time
> --  Date
> _   ___ __
>
> VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  19 dB 1103 -- 2 Jun
>
> VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  20 dB 1115 -- 2 Jun
>
> VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  27 dB 1131 -- 2 Jun
>
> VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  25 dB 1146 -- 2 Jun
>
> The signal reports also show the signal enhancement taking place as
> sunrise approached my location.
>
> 73, and GL to everyone who tries northern hemisphere, summer time
> operations on TB.
>
> de Milt, N5IA
>
>
>
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

2016-06-06 Thread Milt


-Original Message- 
From: Bob Garrett

Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:58 AM
To: jkaufm...@alum.mit.edu ; 'Carl Luetzelschwab' ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

...SNIP...

I believe we still have so much to learn on this subject.
That is why nothing beats listening no matter what the numbers say.
73 and gud DX.  Bob K3UL

=

I am certainly guilty of neglecting 'The Band' during the northern 
hemisphere summers.  Near constant QRN and short nights (for sleeping) are 
the two main reasons I have traditionally not operated TB between the 
equinoxes.


This year I have made a concerted effort to do spot checks on the band, 
particularly the early morning hours when QRN is the lowest.  However, this 
time frame allows a possibility of contacts only to the Pacific region.


I truly believe that Bob's statement above re listening is the true clue to 
fully utilizing the fickle offerings of 160 Meters.


As an example, this past week, the local morning of June 2, I CQed to the 
west, alternately at 225, 270 & 315 degrees.  I began at 1100 Z and 
continued until my sunrise at ~1200 Z.


I did not receive any responses to my CQ's; no contacts were logged.

QRN level was quite low, so I can only presume there were few if any 
stations in the targeted areas of South Pacific Islands, ZL, VK, JA, UA0 and 
SE Asia on the air during this time period.


I believe 'The Band' was WIDE OPEN to at least a portion of VK, if not other 
areas.  Apparently no stations were listening at that time.


The RBN system provides a good insight into the propagation available. 
Besides western US RBN station reports, I noted the following.


 de   DX Freq SNR   Time --  
Date

_   ___ __

VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  19 dB 1103 -- 2 Jun

VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  20 dB 1115 -- 2 Jun

VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  27 dB 1131 -- 2 Jun

VK4CT N5IA  1824.5  25 dB 1146 -- 2 Jun

The signal reports also show the signal enhancement taking place as sunrise 
approached my location.


73, and GL to everyone who tries northern hemisphere, summer time operations 
on TB.


de Milt, N5IA


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: low band propagation at solar min

2016-06-06 Thread Bob Garrett
Hello John et al,

 

The 1987 cycle was truly amazing with similar conditions here in PA.  JA
opening most mornings and EU nights like the 20 meter band.  Unlike W1FV, I
only heard 9M2AX a few times and worked him once on January 1, 1989.  That
night, he was louder than the EU stations he was working.  Great fun for
sure.

 

Like Dave said, the 2008 and 2009 years were very good too.  

 

I believe we still have so much to learn on this subject.  That is why
nothing beats listening no matter what the numbers say.  73 and gud DX.  Bob
K3UL  

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband