Gents:
I will support Fred's recommendation for RX antennas on TB. Even my
modest back yard could fit three bi-directional EWE's in delta layout among the
trees. I was flabbergasted at how well the signals popped out of the noise
compared to my inverted L TX antenna.
73 de
Gene Smar AD3F
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+ersmar=verizon@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of fmoeves
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 6:25 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L
I agree with what others have said. Best thing I did here in my noisy area was
a Rx antenna. There's no way I could listen to my inverted L here in KY. KB4QZH
Original message From: daraym...@iowatelecom.net Date: 4/19/20
12:35 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Peter Krulewitch ,
topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L The
inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the time. The
few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other times) when
horizontal polarization can work better.73. . . Dave,
W0FLS-Original Message- From: Peter KrulewitchSent: Sunday, April 19,
2020 11:28 AMTo: topband@contesting.comSubject: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted
LHave used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether
comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx
fer your ideas.W2LLSent from my iPhone_Searchable Archives:
http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband -
Topband Reflector _ Searchable
Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
