Topband: 9 circle array

2015-12-07 Thread Glenn Biggerstaff
Has anyone built the DX Engineering version of the YCCC 9 circle array ?I am 
considering one and would like anyone's feedback. I have read the NCJ article 
and was on the list for the original kit version until it got squashed. Also is 
anyone using the W7IUV preamp with an array of verticals? If so did you build 
it on a pc board or on perfboard?

Glenn, w...@ww4b.net


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: 160 puzzle

2013-01-09 Thread Glenn Biggerstaff
Post is pressure treated and has been outdoors a couple of years .Antenna is 
insulated with a PVC pipe sleeve .My hand does not effect it till I touch, if 
only 1/16 inch away .The effect is greater if I touch the one of the u bolts 
clamping the PVC to the wooden post .The u bolt is insulated from the antenna 
by the pcv. No effect if I touch the PVC. If I disconnect the base loading and 
put the analyzer direct to the antenna , resonance is about 8 MHz and touching 
the u bolt or post has no effect.

Glenn, w...@ww4b.net


_
Topband Reflector


Topband: 160 receive antenna puzzle update

2013-01-09 Thread Glenn Biggerstaff
Thanks to everyone who responded .The posts by K7TJR and W8JI were most helpful 
in understanding what is going on .I should add that the phasing box in the 
shack is continuously variable, (NCC-1)  so changes in the phasing caused by 
changes in the antenna surroundings  came be compensated . It works quite well 
but I think there maybe some benefit to change the elements to top loaded style.

73 Glenn WW4B
_
Topband Reflector


Topband: A 160 Meter antenne puzzle

2013-01-08 Thread Glenn Biggerstaff
Hi everybody and happy new year .
I have what I think is an interesting  antenna riddle . I have some receive  
antenna verticals (4) that are selected by relays in pair and the pair is fed 
back to the shack to a phasing boxing .Each antenna is AL tubing about 30 feet 
tall, base loaded with an inductor and a resistor very much like ON4UN has for 
his 4 square receive  array .There is a 1 to 1 balun between the antenna and 
the feed line . The tubing is insulated  with an eight inch length of pvc pipe 
from  the 4x4 that supports it .The overlap between the tubing and the 4x4 is 
about eight inches as well . I was doing some testing today and discovered that 
touching the 4x4 at the top caused the swr to increase from about 1.2 to 1 to 
1.7 to 1 . The lower on the 4x4 I touch the less the effect . I am only moving 
my finger a fraction of an inch and my hand not at all when this happens .The 
feed lines are disconnected when this is going on .There is no dc continuity 
between the antenna and any mounting hardware or th
 e post .I disconnected the base loading and put  the analyzer on it and it is 
resonant at about 8 mhz and touching the post causes no change with this setup 
. There are eight 30 foot radials laying on the ground and a 2 inch wide copper 
strap about 3 foot long  in the hole that the 4x4 is in .
What is going on here and should I make an effort to limit the coupling between 
the 4x4 and the antenna?


73 , Glenn WW4B
_
Topband Reflector


Topband: Receive Antenna interaction with Transmit Antenna

2011-12-28 Thread Glenn Biggerstaff
Hi everyone. I am in the process of building some new receive antennas 
and have been modeling a number of choices .My Transmit antenna is a 
full wave vertical loop 70 foot high and about 210 feet long .Currently 
I have a pair of short (28 ' ) base loaded verticals toward EU phased 
with a DX Engineering NCC-1 and one 550 foot beverage toward EU .They 
both work fairly well toward EU ,I would rate them about the same . I 
have been considering some type of circle array but it would be fairly 
close to the loop ~ 175 ft. When I start modeling vertical receive 
arrays the interaction is quite bad .I have been unable to come up with 
a scheme to detune the loop from the shack ,the only way I have come up 
with so far requires a relay at 2 points on the loop. Beverages in the 
same area don't seem to be affected very much . I understand about the 
need to limit the rf the receiver sees, I am just concerned about how to 
limit the degradation of the receive array .
  Question 1 Are receive arrays with active antennas less affected than 
arrays with passive elements . I don't know how to model the active 
antennas . Do you just put a high resistance load at the bottom of the 
vertical to simulate the amplifier ?
  Question 2  Is there a better way to detune the loop ?
 Lastly  am I too concerned about the interaction on receive antenna 
performance ?
Thanks for you time .

Glenn WW4B
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK