Topband: PLease!

2022-02-01 Thread MEL CRICHTON
Folks... when you reply to a post PLEASE do not include the entire 
digest in your reply just the message, or even better just the line 
or paragraph, that you are responding to. I could not find the new stuff 
inside all the old attachments in the last digest.


Sorry to be a griper Not my usual cheery self today

Mel KJ9C


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Remotes

2015-02-27 Thread Mel Crichton
For a number of reasons, I operate my regular Indiana QTH from here in 
Montana. Here we have CCRs that limit me to very low invisible stealth 
antennas and fewer bands, and being surrounded by mountains 2000 to 5000 
feet higher does not help. So for DXCC purposes and for 160 meters I am in 
Indiana and give the QTH as IN. Since I started DXCC from Indiana years ago, 
I use the IN station to work new ones (only 5 to go). It's the same rig and 
antennas that I used to get this far in DXCC.


When I do operate from Montana, puny signal that it is, it's for contests 
and CW Ops events (but no 160 meters here) and I hand out MT as the 
state and make a few folks happy for a new multiplier (if they can hear me).


There's no question where I am in LOTW there's a log for each location, 
and I keep them separate. A ham checking LOTW for WAS will see our qso in 
the correct state.


If remote operators take a few extra steps so there is no question as to 
their STATION location, the system works. However, I too have heard from 
very strong signals on 160 the wrong time of day without "/" identifiers. 
I'd guess that these folks would have cheated regardless of ARRL's actions.


Mel KJ9C 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: Pulleys for antennas in trees

2015-01-27 Thread Mel Crichton
Speaking as an engineer, the owner of an oak tree farm, and a ham with 
antennas in trees, please use some caution when using ropes in trees:


1. An antenna tied to a tree branch exerts some force W (lets say it's a 
pulling force or hanging weight) on the branch.


2. If instead of tying to the branch, you tie off the other end of the rope 
on the tree trunk or use a counterweight, the force on the branch doubles 
(to 2W) there's still the weight of the antenna, but you add the weight 
of the counterweight (or anchoring force die to tying off at the trunk)


3  If instead of the antenna rope, you tie a pulley to the branch, then the 
pulley sees 2W force (the antenna plus the counterweight) and that force is 
transferred to the branch.


4.ButiIf the pulley's support rope is tied off at the trunk or 
counterweighted, then the force the branch sees doubles (just as in example 
2 above) exerting 4W force on the branch   So there's 4 times as much 
stress on the branch vs merely tying the antenna rope to the branch.


However, most of us can't get high enough in a tree to tie off the antenna, 
so we sling ropes over branches.


So if using a pulley, please be sure the supporting branch is stout I 
had to replace the windshield of my truck to prove this point to me. I find 
it best to install inverted vee type (center supported) dipoles or very 
light inverted L's to minimize the sideways stress on the branch (sideways 
stress intensifies when the wind blows hard). And yes I have pulleys high in 
trees.


Mel KJ9C


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: SP remote from DN45

2014-12-28 Thread Mel Crichton
Wish I had an antenna here in MT DN45 for 160, but that can't be. Second 
best option was to remote operate my station in EM69, even though I can't 
switch RX antennas remotely (Yet! That will change before next TBDC)...  So 
I switched between the TX and the north beverage (the least directional and 
quietest)


No DX this time, but I was LP and heard only J6 and KV4FZ, neither could 
hear me...  Best was CN98 (a 6 pointer) - put 200 QSOs in the log... If the 
intenet connection would not have crashed six times I might have stayed a 
bit longer... (not sure if it failed in Indiana or in Montana, wasn't a 
problem when we operated W1AW/9 a few weeks ago)... another glitch to iron 
out before next contest


Thanks again to the organizers and all who participated... there must hae 
been a number of QRP stations, or it sure seemed that way


Mel KJ9C EM69 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Beverage transformer enclosures

2011-11-11 Thread Mel Crichton
I use a standard PVC outdoor electrical box with waterproof cover. It's ABOUT 2 
1/2 by 3/2 and maybe 2 inches deep. with a 3/4 inch diameter recessed opening 
on the bottom (meant for conduit but a nice fit for SO 239)

The gasketed top keeps water out well. I use feedthru screws or (for 12 volts) 
RCA jacks, all sealed with RTV.  I use one for four-way antenna switching using 
small relays.

Mel KJ9C

> What do you use for transformer enclosures?
>
> The ones that I have been using did not stand up. Just curious what others 
> use.
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Inverted L Question

2011-01-07 Thread Mel Crichton
By all means make the vertical portion as tall as possible, even if the 
horizontal part slopes downward a bit. My 90 footer is really an "inverted J" 
over a hickory tree with the horizontal part sloping downward at about 20-30 
degrees angle it plays fine with 100 watts Better than my short 
beverages can hear

Mel KJ9C

My question is:  I can get the vertical portion up about 80-100 feet with the 
remainder horizontal.  The issue is the horizontal part will have to slope if I 
put the vertical that high.  Is this ok, or should I put it vertically high 
enough to make the horizontal portion level. 
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK