Re: Topband: Polyphaser

2015-03-01 Thread Cecil
They also made an earlier version that had an analog meter.  It would indicate 
the clamping voltage.  

Typical failure mode for the Polyphaser is an open gas tube that doesn't 
clamp...  You loose protection and don't know it...

I've also been told they also have a shelf life and at times the clamping 
voltage can decrease causing them to clamp at too low a voltage which wouldn't 
be a good thing in TX system use.

Cecil
K5DL

Sent using recycled electrons.

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Art Snapper  wrote:
> 
> Polyphaser made a tester.
> http://wrblock.com/WRBproducts/DIGIfist/DigiFIST.html
> 
> Possibly a land mobile shop in your area has one. Essentially they
> generated low current, high voltage until the tube fired.
> 
> Perhaps it is different with HF, but in my land mobile experience, if the
> supressor was damaged, either it was shorted, or obvious damage was
> present when disassembled.
> 
> Their antenna protectors have significant attenuation when used outside the
> rated frequency range.
> 
> 
> Art
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Greg Wilson  wrote:
>> 
>> Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good?  I
>> have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they
>> are still doing the job.  Thanks, Greg
>> _
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Polyphaser

2015-03-01 Thread Cecil
Polyphaser made a test box for a few years...model was F.I.S.T. 4.  Worked 
really well..

Watch ebay...they may turn up there at times.

Cecil
K5DL



Sent using recycled electrons.

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 5:27 PM, "Tom W8JI"  wrote:
> 
> When I test things like that, I high pot them with a home made tester. Things 
> like this are not difficult to make. You can buy a surplus HV power supply 
> used to ionize air for a few bucks, and stick it in a box with a meter on it.
> 
> You don't need to get fancy, just check it for breakdown voltage. If it is 
> bad, the breakdown voltage will be way off.
> 
> Ameritron gets about 5-10 customers a year where gas tubes in lightning 
> protection go bad. They break down early. The result of that is an amplifier 
> can get up to a few hundred watts or more, and then *wham* the feedline 
> shorts! This is always great on parts.
> 
> I don't have a single GDT in my TX system, although I've tried them in my RX 
> systems out in switch boxes near antennas. I have mixed results using low 
> voltage GDT devices to protect relays and stuff. I have no damage at all in 
> the house without them.
> 
> 73 Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message - From: "Art Snapper" 
> To: "Greg Wilson" 
> Cc: "160" 
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: Polyphaser
> 
> 
>> Polyphaser made a tester.
>> http://wrblock.com/WRBproducts/DIGIfist/DigiFIST.html
>> 
>> Possibly a land mobile shop in your area has one. Essentially they
>> generated low current, high voltage until the tube fired.
>> 
>> Perhaps it is different with HF, but in my land mobile experience, if the
>> supressor was damaged, either it was shorted, or obvious damage was
>> present when disassembled.
>> 
>> Their antenna protectors have significant attenuation when used outside the
>> rated frequency range.
>> 
>> 
>> Art
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Greg Wilson  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good?  I
>>> have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they
>>> are still doing the job.  Thanks, Greg
>>> _
>>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>> _
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4257/9209 - Release Date: 03/01/15
> 
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Polyphaser

2015-03-01 Thread Tom W8JI
When I test things like that, I high pot them with a home made tester. 
Things like this are not difficult to make. You can buy a surplus HV power 
supply used to ionize air for a few bucks, and stick it in a box with a 
meter on it.


You don't need to get fancy, just check it for breakdown voltage. If it is 
bad, the breakdown voltage will be way off.


Ameritron gets about 5-10 customers a year where gas tubes in lightning 
protection go bad. They break down early. The result of that is an amplifier 
can get up to a few hundred watts or more, and then *wham* the feedline 
shorts! This is always great on parts.


I don't have a single GDT in my TX system, although I've tried them in my RX 
systems out in switch boxes near antennas. I have mixed results using low 
voltage GDT devices to protect relays and stuff. I have no damage at all in 
the house without them.


73 Tom




- Original Message - 
From: "Art Snapper" 

To: "Greg Wilson" 
Cc: "160" 
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Polyphaser



Polyphaser made a tester.
http://wrblock.com/WRBproducts/DIGIfist/DigiFIST.html

Possibly a land mobile shop in your area has one. Essentially they
generated low current, high voltage until the tube fired.

Perhaps it is different with HF, but in my land mobile experience, if the
supressor was damaged, either it was shorted, or obvious damage was
present when disassembled.

Their antenna protectors have significant attenuation when used outside 
the

rated frequency range.


Art


On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Greg Wilson  wrote:


Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good?  I
have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they
are still doing the job.  Thanks, Greg
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4257/9209 - Release Date: 03/01/15



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Polyphaser

2015-03-01 Thread Art Snapper
Polyphaser made a tester.
http://wrblock.com/WRBproducts/DIGIfist/DigiFIST.html

Possibly a land mobile shop in your area has one. Essentially they
generated low current, high voltage until the tube fired.

Perhaps it is different with HF, but in my land mobile experience, if the
supressor was damaged, either it was shorted, or obvious damage was
 present when disassembled.

Their antenna protectors have significant attenuation when used outside the
rated frequency range.


Art


On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Greg Wilson  wrote:

> Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good?  I
> have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they
> are still doing the job.  Thanks, Greg
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Polyphaser

2015-03-01 Thread Brad Rehm
I don't know if the policy is still in place, but I remember that
Polyphaser used to offer free testing of their products if you sent them
back to the factory.  Words about it were buried somewhere in their
catalog, and I used the service many years ago when I was about to put one
of their old coax arrestors back into service.

Testing them yourself can be difficult, because it requires a high-voltage
transient generator with known waveform characteristics.  They're not too
difficult to build, but sending a questionable part back to the factory is
the best option for most of us.

73,
Brad  KV5V

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Greg Wilson  wrote:

> Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good?  I
> have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they
> are still doing the job.  Thanks, Greg
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-21 Thread Tom W8JI


Could that not be said of any inline protection then?



Almost, anything but a disconnect.

Also, while we sometimes go wild with grounds, nearly ALL of the protection 
(or lack of protection) comes from how things are bonded and common grounded 
going into the protected area.


I can't stress the point that a proper entrance and proper ground bonding, 
so everything rises together without high current loops through equipment, 
is nearly 100% of actual protection.


My towers take at least one hit in every lightning storm, and other than RF 
ground radials on my four square area, I have no fantastic grounds. My 318 
foot tower has eight deep-buried number 6 or 8 gauge copper radials about 
50-100 feet long, interspersed with around thirty  #16 shallow bare wires 
from when I fed the tower as a vertical. It has only a few ground rods.


http://www.w8ji.com/Antenna%20grounds.htm

The house has a buried perimeter conductor, but almost no ground rods.

I never have lightning damage inside buildings.  Not one piece of consumer 
gear has ever been damaged. Never lost a modem.


Despite what we sometimes hear, nearly all protection comes from how 
entrances are constructed and bonded. The worse thing in the world is an 
entrance ground that is not connected to the power mains ground.


73 Tom 


_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread Tom W8JI
The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas 
tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you 
unknowingly unprotected.  After so many ionizations the gas tube will fail 
and won't clamp on the next strike.  For a time Polyphaser made a test set 
to verify the function of the gas tube.  We use those at work to test 
those in use once a year and every year we find a few that have failed. 
Polyphaser quit selling the test set (FIST4) several years back so one 
will need to find another way to test themmaybe a meggar.





They don't only fail high. They fail low too.

One of the more common damage failures in high power amplifiers is running 
them in systems with lightning protection gas tubes that fire at lower than 
planned voltage.


That can really tear things up if the lightning protection device is the 
right distance away to reflect the wrong impedance at the amplifier output 
port.


Such devices have limited value anyway. If they let a few kilowatts of 
energy out, they will let enough back in to tear things up. 


_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread Jim Brown

On 1/20/2013 1:40 AM, cx...@4email.net wrote:
I started replacing all items along the path and discovered the PP on 
the grounded copper board at the base of the tower had gone 'south'... 


Several points here. First, there is no value to lightning suppression 
at the base of a tower unless that tower is next to the shack.  A 
lightning suppressor shorts the center conductor to the shield to 
protect equipment that the coax feeds.  It is most effective very near 
the equipment.


Second, lightning protection depends very strongly on proper bonding 
together of all the equipment and wiring in your home, to each other, 
and to all earth connections. That means EVERYTHING.  Caps for emphasis 
added.


Third, while I have no practical way of knowing when Polyphasers have 
failed "open," I have experienced at least four occasions of Polyphasers 
failing shorted. On at least two of those occasions the cause of the 
failure has been very high voltage at the Polyphaser, most recently 
caused by the 40M element of my 80/40 fan breaking in a windstorm and 
hitting with legal limit power before I had figured that out.


It should be possible to restore the Polyphaser to new condition by 
replacing the gas tube if a source for the tube (including its spec) can 
be found.


73, Jim K9YC
_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread cx7tt

On Sun Jan 20 01:58:14 2013, Cecil wrote:

The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes 
for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly 
unprotected.  After so many ionizations the gas tube will fail and won't clamp 
on the next strike.  For a time Polyphaser made a test set to verify the 
function of the gas tube.  We use those at work to test those in use once a 
year and every year we find a few that have failed.  Polyphaser quit selling 
the test set (FIST4) several years back so one will need to find another way to 
test themmaybe a meggar.

Cecil
K5DL




'snip'



Topband Reflector


Cecil,

That's a good point. About a year ago I was having problems with my 
Steppir..after replacing coax, doing lot's of testing on the Steppir 
control box I started replacing all items along the path and discovered 
the PP on the grounded copper board at the base of the tower had gone 
'south'...


73
Tom
_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-19 Thread Cecil
The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes 
for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly 
unprotected.  After so many ionizations the gas tube will fail and won't clamp 
on the next strike.  For a time Polyphaser made a test set to verify the 
function of the gas tube.  We use those at work to test those in use once a 
year and every year we find a few that have failed.  Polyphaser quit selling 
the test set (FIST4) several years back so one will need to find another way to 
test themmaybe a meggar.

Cecil
K5DL

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 18, 2013, at 9:15 PM, HAROLD SMITH JR  wrote:

> Hello Tom,
>  
> I have Polyphaser and I.C.E. units on all my cables ( Antenna and all Control 
> ). 
> 
> I installed them in 1991 after several strikes damaged my Tranceivers. 
> Since then, I have had no problems.
> The most important is a good Grounding System. A couple of ground rods won't 
> do the trick.
>  
> 73..Price W0RI  near Saint Louis, MO.
>  
>  
>  
> Subject: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Am in the process of running underground coax/control cables to DXE UE-1P 
> Grounding and Utility box IOT run 40m V dipole and topband inverted L/FCP.  I 
> have had the Polyphaser 50UX in the HF system since 2008 and it has worked 
> wellI have two each of PP and ICE in the radio closet and wonder which 
> the 
> group would recommend over the other. The reason the HF system has the PP is 
> that they arrived before the ICE units. What has been your experience/advice?
> 
> 73
> Tom
> CX7TT aka CW7T
> _
> Topband Reflector
> _
> Topband Reflector
_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-19 Thread John K9UWA
Like Price I was seriously hit in 1989 lost all radios computers TV sets other
appliances lots of coax and switches. Never again. Three towers the tallest 
is 185 feet. So I am the local lightening rod at well over 100 feet above all 
local trees. I have 100 ground rods connected by 1200 feet of 3/8" ID 
Copper Tubing. The Inductance per foot of this copper tubing is lower than 2 
inch wide copper strap. Copper tubing is silver soldered to all ground rods. 
All Coax and other lines entering the house have Polyphaser Devices on 
them including phone power etc. Tall Tower has been hit many times since 
installing the system. Zero Damge. Finally the whole house shunt protector 
gave up the ghost a few years ago and had to purchase a new one.

John k9uwa


> Hello Tom,
>  
> I have Polyphaser and I.C.E. units on all my cables ( Antenna and all Control
> ).
> 
> 
> I installed them in 1991 after several strikes damaged my Tranceivers. 
> Since then, I have had no problems.
> The most important is a good Grounding System. A couple of ground rods won't
> do the trick.   73..Price W0RI  near Saint Louis, MO.       Subject: Topband:
> Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Am in the process of running underground coax/control cables to DXE UE-1P
> Grounding and Utility box IOT run 40m V dipole and topband inverted L/FCP.  I
> have had the Polyphaser 50UX in the HF system since 2008 and it has worked
> wellI have two each of PP and ICE in the radio closet and wonder which the
> group would recommend over the other. The reason the HF system has the PP is
> that they arrived before the ICE units. What has been your experience/advice?
> 
> 73
> Tom
> CX7TT aka CW7T
> _
> Topband Reflector
> _
> Topband Reflector
> 


--- End of forwarded message ---
John Goller, K9UWA & Jean Goller, N9PXF 
Antique Radio Restorations
k9...@arrl.net
Visit our Web Site at:
http://www.JohnJeanAntiqueRadio.com
4836 Ranch Road
Leo, IN 46765
USA
1-260-637-6426

_
Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-19 Thread HAROLD SMITH JR
Hello Tom,
 
I have Polyphaser and I.C.E. units on all my cables ( Antenna and all Control 
). 

I installed them in 1991 after several strikes damaged my Tranceivers. 
Since then, I have had no problems.
The most important is a good Grounding System. A couple of ground rods won't 
do the trick.
 
73..Price W0RI  near Saint Louis, MO.
 
 
 
Subject: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

Hello,

Am in the process of running underground coax/control cables to DXE UE-1P 
Grounding and Utility box IOT run 40m V dipole and topband inverted L/FCP.  I 
have had the Polyphaser 50UX in the HF system since 2008 and it has worked 
wellI have two each of PP and ICE in the radio closet and wonder which the 
group would recommend over the other. The reason the HF system has the PP is 
that they arrived before the ICE units. What has been your experience/advice?

73
Tom
CX7TT aka CW7T
_
Topband Reflector
_
Topband Reflector