Re: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

2019-03-02 Thread Ashraf Chaabane
Thanks Clive! I did a F/B test towards the TX ant and the F/B is indeed 
5 db less. I may need to think of that solution.


73 Ash 3V8SF

-- Original Message --
From: "Clive GM3POI" 
To: "Ashraf Chaabane" 
Sent: 02/03/2019 12:32:02
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF


Ash,
 model it when the RX antenna is pointing at the TX antenna. There is a good 
chance it will affect the pattern, but lifting the base of the TX antenna above 
ground with a relay when on RX will cure that. 73 Clive GM3POI

-Original Message-
From: Ashraf Chaabane [mailto:ash.kf5...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 March 2019 10:57
To: Clive GM3POI; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re[2]: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Clive,

The vertical is 130m away from the array center. I'm presuming this is a
good distance to avoid interaction.

73 Ash 3V8SF

-- Original Message --
From: "Clive GM3POI" 
To: "Ashraf Chaabane" ; topband@contesting.com
Sent: 02/03/2019 11:54:48
Subject: RE: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF


Ash model in also your TX antenna and see whether you need to isolate that
vertical on RX with a relay.  73 Clive GM3POI

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ashraf
Chaabane
Sent: 02 March 2019 10:46
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Hi guys,

I built a 4 Square Receiving Array for 160m at 3V8SF. I put details in
my website: http://kf5eyy.info/topband.htm
The achieved F/B so far is 20 db and the F/S is 19 db. There is still
room for improvement with better matching of the elements. I'll need
time to do that.

Thanks to Ahmad 3V1B and Majdi 3V1M for helping me setting up of the
elements. Also to K7TJR, W3LPL and W0FLS
for the valuable support.

73 Ash 3V8SF, 3V8SS
www.kf5eyy.info
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus






_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

2019-03-02 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV


> The vertical is 130m away from the array center.

Ash, at less than 1 wavelength the TX antenna is still within the
near field and can most certainly impact the receiving array.  The
real questions are how much does it impact the shortened verticals
(pattern impact) and how much noise does it radiate because it is
resonant.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2019-03-02 5:56 AM, Ashraf Chaabane wrote:

Clive,

The vertical is 130m away from the array center. I'm presuming this is a 
good distance to avoid interaction.


73 Ash 3V8SF

-- Original Message --
From: "Clive GM3POI" 
To: "Ashraf Chaabane" ; topband@contesting.com
Sent: 02/03/2019 11:54:48
Subject: RE: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Ash model in also your TX antenna and see whether you need to isolate 
that

vertical on RX with a relay.  73 Clive GM3POI

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ashraf
Chaabane
Sent: 02 March 2019 10:46
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Hi guys,

I built a 4 Square Receiving Array for 160m at 3V8SF. I put details in
my website: http://kf5eyy.info/topband.htm
The achieved F/B so far is 20 db and the F/S is 19 db. There is still
room for improvement with better matching of the elements. I'll need
time to do that.

Thanks to Ahmad 3V1B and Majdi 3V1M for helping me setting up of the
elements. Also to K7TJR, W3LPL and W0FLS
for the valuable support.

73 Ash 3V8SF, 3V8SS
www.kf5eyy.info
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
Reflector



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

2019-03-02 Thread Clive GM3POI
Ash model in also your TX antenna and see whether you need to isolate that
vertical on RX with a relay.  73 Clive GM3POI

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ashraf
Chaabane
Sent: 02 March 2019 10:46
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Hi guys,

I built a 4 Square Receiving Array for 160m at 3V8SF. I put details in 
my website: http://kf5eyy.info/topband.htm
The achieved F/B so far is 20 db and the F/S is 19 db. There is still 
room for improvement with better matching of the elements. I'll need 
time to do that.

Thanks to Ahmad 3V1B and Majdi 3V1M for helping me setting up of the 
elements. Also to K7TJR, W3LPL and W0FLS
for the valuable support.

73 Ash 3V8SF, 3V8SS
www.kf5eyy.info
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

2019-03-02 Thread Ashraf Chaabane

Clive,

The vertical is 130m away from the array center. I'm presuming this is a 
good distance to avoid interaction.


73 Ash 3V8SF

-- Original Message --
From: "Clive GM3POI" 
To: "Ashraf Chaabane" ; topband@contesting.com
Sent: 02/03/2019 11:54:48
Subject: RE: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF


Ash model in also your TX antenna and see whether you need to isolate that
vertical on RX with a relay.  73 Clive GM3POI

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ashraf
Chaabane
Sent: 02 March 2019 10:46
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

Hi guys,

I built a 4 Square Receiving Array for 160m at 3V8SF. I put details in
my website: http://kf5eyy.info/topband.htm
The achieved F/B so far is 20 db and the F/S is 19 db. There is still
room for improvement with better matching of the elements. I'll need
time to do that.

Thanks to Ahmad 3V1B and Majdi 3V1M for helping me setting up of the
elements. Also to K7TJR, W3LPL and W0FLS
for the valuable support.

73 Ash 3V8SF, 3V8SS
www.kf5eyy.info
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Topband: 4 Square Receiving at 3V8SF

2019-03-02 Thread Ashraf Chaabane

Hi guys,

I built a 4 Square Receiving Array for 160m at 3V8SF. I put details in 
my website: http://kf5eyy.info/topband.htm
The achieved F/B so far is 20 db and the F/S is 19 db. There is still 
room for improvement with better matching of the elements. I'll need 
time to do that.


Thanks to Ahmad 3V1B and Majdi 3V1M for helping me setting up of the 
elements. Also to K7TJR, W3LPL and W0FLS 		for the valuable support.


73 Ash 3V8SF, 3V8SS
www.kf5eyy.info
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: 4-square antenna spacing

2018-06-14 Thread Ed Hughes
Jim, you need ON4UN's 5th edition of "Low Band Dxing" page 11-93 talks 
about the 4 square with 1/8 wave spacing.


He says, regarding the 1/8 wave spacing (67 feet +/-)
- gain is down 1.3 db compared to 1/4 wave spacing.
- directivity is as good or better than 1/4 wave.
- has much narrower bandwith than 1/4 wave
- is harder to feed than 1/4 wave.

He covers the 1/4 wave 4 square in detail and may cover tweeking the 
spacing.


Get that book if you don't already have it.

Ed
KG4W


On 6/14/2018 2:57 PM, Jim & Nan Denneny wrote:

Manual says min spacing for 160M is 54ft and optimal spacing is 135ft.  135ft 
is a non-starter for my lot.  Can anyone comment on performance degradation 
between these two extremes?  Minimal? Substantial? Sensitivity? f/b? I cannot 
find experimental data.

Jim K7EG

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: 4-square antenna spacing

2018-06-14 Thread Jim & Nan Denneny
Manual says min spacing for 160M is 54ft and optimal spacing is 135ft.  135ft 
is a non-starter for my lot.  Can anyone comment on performance degradation 
between these two extremes?  Minimal? Substantial? Sensitivity? f/b? I cannot 
find experimental data.

Jim K7EG

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: 4 square

2016-01-13 Thread Steve Daniel
Used both the 4 square and 8 circle array by DX Engineering. Both work but, in 
my thunderstorm environment, I spent many hours and as many dollars as the 
systems originally cost repairing them over three seasons. This is despite 
keeping the systems powered off, except when being used. The guys at DXE said 
doing so would protect the systems. Unfortunately that proved not to be the 
case at my middle Tennessee qth. Steve, NN4T

Sent from my iPhone
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: 4 square

2016-01-13 Thread Rick Stealey

> Even so the odd Dec/Jan thunderstorm can cause a problem so I have a supply 
> of 450 ohm resistors of the type recommended on this reflector, on hand for 
> quick repairs! The maintenance never ends! Steve, NN4T

Get some gas tubes from Mouser.  I use 652-2049-12-BT1LF.  62 cents each last 
time I ordered about a year ago.
Any surges are shorted around the device (resistor or transformer).  The gas 
tubes have no effect whatsoever on the normal operation.
Simply connect one across your terminating resistor, and one across the fed end 
wouldn't hurt either.

The maintenance won't end, but the maintenance due to lightning induced surges 
will.  No, they won't protect against a direct hit on the Beverage, but then 
you would have to find the 500 feet of wire first !

Rick  K2XT

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: 4 square

2016-01-13 Thread Tom W8JI
Used both the 4 square and 8 circle array by DX Engineering. Both work 
but, in my thunderstorm environment, I spent many hours and as many 
dollars as the systems originally cost repairing them over three seasons. 
This is despite keeping the systems powered off, except when being used. 
The guys at DXE said doing so would protect the systems. Unfortunately 
that proved not to be the case at my middle Tennessee qth. Steve, NN4T




Whoever said that probably had good intentions, but unfortunately that is 
false.


No matter where you are located, off or on makes an immeasurable difference 
in likelihood of lightning damage.


You really have to find out what is being damaged and where the ground loop 
causing the problem is your system. It should be curable to a large extent, 
but not by simply turning it off. That makes almost no difference for 
lightning. 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: 4 square

2016-01-13 Thread Steven R Daniel, D.D.S.
Thanks Tim. I should have done my homework. Now I have 8 580’ terminated 
beverages with Array Solutions transformers and terminating resistors. They are 
quite robust but when the warmer, less stable weather comes I disconnect both 
ends of each antenna to protect the hardware. Even so the odd Dec/Jan 
thunderstorm can cause a problem so I have a supply of 450 ohm resistors of the 
type recommended on this reflector, on hand for quick repairs! The maintenance 
never ends! Steve, NN4T

 

From: Tim Shoppa [mailto:tsho...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:47 AM
To: Steve Daniel
Subject: Re: Topband: 4 square

 

The DX Engineering arrays use hi-impedance verticals that need a preamp. The 
preamp is especially susceptible to lightning damage and does not matter 
whether it is powered on or not.

 

There are other 4-squares and 8-circles that use passive low-Z elements that do 
not use preamps and have no circuitry that is susceptible to lightning damage 
(although of course they can still be damaged by lightning.) W3LPL talks a 
little about the use of hi-z elements vs lo-z elements (he uses Low-Z elements) 
: 
http://www.contestuniversity.com/attachments/W3LPL_Receiving_Antennas_2014.pptx

 

Tim N3QE

 

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steve Daniel <n...@comcast.net> wrote:

Used both the 4 square and 8 circle array by DX Engineering. Both work but, in 
my thunderstorm environment, I spent many hours and as many dollars as the 
systems originally cost repairing them over three seasons. This is despite 
keeping the systems powered off, except when being used. The guys at DXE said 
doing so would protect the systems. Unfortunately that proved not to be the 
case at my middle Tennessee qth. Steve, NN4T

Sent from my iPhone
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Topband: 4-square controllers

2014-07-30 Thread Paul Baldock
Does anybody have an opinion on the DX Engineering verses the Array 
Solutions 4 square controller?


- Paul  KW7Y

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband